Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like a lot of the honest interviews with these guys regarding AAS use. Get to hear some things you otherwise wouldn't. Also realise just how stupidly some of these guys go about their dosages, like Rich Piana haha

  • 2 months later...

I have and use;

- Half Rack with spotter arms - one with a pull up bar integrated is ideal

- Olympic barbell with 220kg weight - i went with olympic bumper plates to save the floor

- 2nd hand set of fixed weight dumbells - 5-30kg

- Flat bench & Adj, Incline bench

This generally covers you for the big 3 movements as well as any free-weight accessory work you might want to fit it

Things like kettlebells, floss bands and med balls can just just come as you need/want

Face pulls have been doing wonders for my dickie shoulders, my shoulders use to ache when I laid on them in bed, now they are fine, only change is doing 100 light face pulls twice a week.

Also finishing off my sessions with 100 full extension med ball slams is a good way to end.

  • Like 1

Face pulls have been doing wonders for my dickie shoulders, my shoulders use to ache when I laid on them in bed, now they are fine, only change is doing 100 light face pulls twice a week.

Also finishing off my sessions with 100 full extension med ball slams is a good way to end.

Yep I need to do more face pulls. I've had a shoulder injury for a few months; can't lie on my left side in bed, which has been my preferred side for 30 years lol.

I started doing band pull aparts in between my bench sets, I can lie on my left side for a few hours now without pain :)

Absolutely love face pulls myself. Always use them as a superset exercise for stuff, though I see them complimenting upper back exercises more than shoulders honestly. Seated cable rows, rather than say shoulder press.

Upright rows to face pulls would be good actually.

The more weight you use for face pulls will bring in more back, if you only use light weight and very high reps they act more on the rear delt I find.

I use the crossover machine set at head height.

As for the body building comps with poses and dancing, well, to me looks as camp as a row of tents.

Not that there's anything wrong with that...............

Yeah and some opiates to help with masking the pain from injuries.

Kids a idiot, I wonder if he knows what it does to his natural hormone production.

Darwinism comes to mind.

^^ just wow.

He is extremely committed to his fitness. Surely he would get decent gains without juicing....it would just take longer.

kid has mental problems. Similar to that of an anorexic teen.

If you're trying to push your body to it's maximum potential, why wouldn't you juice

I am not against juice as a rule, but he is a little young. Kid is still growing, who knows what it could do to his health

Yeah and some opiates to help with masking the pain from injuries.

Kids a idiot, I wonder if he knows what it does to his natural hormone production.

Darwinism comes to mind.

so much this.

I also lol'd at the black guy saying he didnt know the kid was 15 when they started training and that he doesnt juice. I'd wager he the one supplying the kid with it

HIGHLY ill advised by sensible steroid users for anyone to consider the use of AAS until your mid 20s from everything I've read on dat der HR forum I partake in. Anything earlier than that and you're risking damage to your HTPA from shutdown and possible early fusion of epiphyseal growth plates from potentially higher oestrogen levels.

He's almost certainly at the beginning of his natural PEAK PRODUCTION so his test levels would already be above most of ours (unsure of some ages here lol)....there's dead set no need to go throwing in endogenous hormones at that age.

Expect cardiovascular issues before he's 40 if he's actually serious about this path lol.

Edited by Trozzle

I reset my squat weights (and all other exercises) for form reasons a couple of months ago. I used to do high weight (high for me lol) low/mid rane reps, anywhere from 1RM to a max of 10. Occasionally did high rep set once in a while.

Well I thought I'd start from the bottom, going light as hell at 60kg ATG, but for maximum reps and just smash legs that way as I wasn't happy with where my previous squatting form was at. Only squatting once a week, for about 4 or 5 sets but max reps on each one, I've seen what I think are great improvements for me. I added 5kg each week and went for max reps and have worked my way up to 90kg, for 19 reps. It doesn't sound like much, but the most reps I'd achieved prior to this high rep training was 20 @ 80kg, and that was when I was 1 rep maxing about 130kg. I'm not keen to test 1RM again just yet; I just want to stick it out with the high rep training because I think my squat form is better than ever and my back doesn't hurt afterwards, which is a good sign. So far I think it is doing wonders for strength and legs are seeing a bit of thickness for once too. Sometimes less is more!!! Will do 95kg, 100kg and so on in the coming weeks and it'll be interesting to see how I go.

I'm also doing box jumps and steep hill climbs some weeks, which I think are helping too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...