Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If he can bench 175kg he can bench 175kg. Why the need too put PTC and official power lifting comps above everyone/all else?

May be hard to believe, but some people do not want to be power lifters. (and I'm not just talking about weak people)

If it helps you sleep better at night, we took a vid of him doing the lift. Paused at chest level too if that makes it official. I'll see if I can get it off his phone.

Nothing makes it a competition lift if it wasn't at a competition.

But if its paused on the chest without spotters touching the bar then its an excellent gym lift :)

Whoa, everyone take a deep breath.

I ONLY commented because the OP said something about strength training an in a way insinuated his mate was stronger than PL, who compete, thats all.

I never ever competed and had zero interest in competing, so I never compare my gym lifts with those of my competing clients. It doesnt mean I never lifted those weights, but I never benched xxx after I just did 3 squats with over 200kg prior, so I cant compare

This guy is strong regardless, because to hold 175kg over your face is not done by girly boys.

He doesnt need to present a vid, no one does, like someone said he just trains for himself in the gym, just like I did.

I hope one day he, and anyone else that strong, does compete, because I hate seeing wasted talent, which he obviously has.

We had a BB do one of my novice comps recently, apparently he banches over 170kg in the gym, he weighs around 92kg.

He made a good 160kg bench press, with zero PL experience, so clearly very strong

He actually benched 170kg but got 3 red lights on his 3rd attempt

His other lifts were 220kg squat and 220kg deadlift, he always trains with wrist straps and pulls 250kg +, but he couldnt hold onto more than 220kg without them, which surprised him.

He is VERY strong and does zero strength training, he won his first IFBB BB comp

So there are very strong gym lifters out there, what most are saying its VERY different in a comp, as Michael found out

It should be harder! Less range of motion for the roll back and you pretty much have to hammer curl them too (well at least the way I do it).

Fark hammer curling them haha!

I just use my knees to flick them upto my shoulders then sorta roll back at the same time. Works for me at the moment. Be interesting to see how I go when I start doing the 40's.

Recently with the 40's I've been getting someone to hand me one of the DB's when I get into position rather than spending too much time in struggle town getting them there myself. More energy for my actual set.

Fark hammer curling them haha!

I just use my knees to flick them upto my shoulders then sorta roll back at the same time. Works for me at the moment. Be interesting to see how I go when I start doing the 40's.

I use my knees too, but when you get to 35s on a 45 degree incline, your knees can only do so much - need to involve biceps and delts just to get them into starting position!

It's worsened by me usually having come off lat pulldown / chin ups as my token pull exercise on push day = biceps already dead!

Maybe do your benching first or something to see if it makes it any easier.

I don't have the bench at 45 when I incline bench, I found it was working my shoulders more than chest so I moved it down to like 35.

I train alone, so I have become a firm believer of "if i can't get the weight into position, I probably shouldn't be lifting it..."

The reason I do 45deg is because it's smack bang between the angles of my flat bench and behind neck military press. I also have a bit of a back arch while pressing, so that gives it a little bit of a shift towards chest. Though I probably should have less of an angle, as I'm pretty front delt heavy :/

I adopt the same principle for lat muscles, where I'll do seated row (0 degrees), behind neck wide grip pulldown (90 degrees) and close/V grip pulldown in front (not really 45 degrees, but still in between).

Decided to step up my incline dumbells to 35s...getting hard to roll them into starting position!

I thought you'd be doing heavier than that. is that for a straight press or is that press twist (not sure on the real name for it)?

Re the angle, I've dropped it down a bit from 45 to lessen the strain on the front delt which I am overworking at the moment.

Edited by SRS13

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...