Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at taking my car out to the track. right now i am performing the neccessary upgrades to ensure i can race.

I saw that i need to have a secondary bonnet restraint. What do you guys use?

I have a standard bonnet and i think i will look like a wanker if i put bonnet pins on it. Anyone got other suggestions?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201649-secondary-bonnet-restraints/
Share on other sites

Im looking at taking my car out to the track. right now i am performing the neccessary upgrades to ensure i can race.

I saw that i need to have a secondary bonnet restraint. What do you guys use?

I have a standard bonnet and i think i will look like a wanker if i put bonnet pins on it. Anyone got other suggestions?

Cheers

Does it state that its needed for a stock bonnet?

The OEM latch is unlikely to fail, and if it does, the safety catch is also unlikely to fail.. if you see it quick enough.

I wouldnt be worried about a secondary catch for an OEM bonnet. Unless it clearly states it IS required for an OEM bonnet too.

Iv been track racing for years, and the only people i know with pins are those with CF bonnets where the catch isnt bolted to anything structural, IE the fiberglass skeleton.

Also, out of the many many many days i have been to i have NEVER ever seen a bonnet come unlatched or fly open.

The odd muffler fall out the ass, fuel tank straps coming off and blown motors/boxes, even an engine mount bolt working loose and flying out under the car... :D but never a bonnet!

Edited by gotRICE?

I've seen many carbon fibre bonnets come off actually. It's really hilarious to watch (not for the owner of the car though).

They often smash backwards and smash the roof and the windscreen. Sometimes they crack badly and bits of the bonnet flies off.

Most of the track days ive scrutineered, a secondary bonnet restraint is necessary. Lots of people hook an old belt from the bonnet frame and clip it down through the bumper or so. Another way is with a small chain and a shackle/caribbina and hook it onto the radiator support.

basically it depends on the Supplementary regulations for the event you are entering. If the Supp regs dont say anything you don't need a secondary restraint unless it is full on racing (schedule C requires secondary restraints for non road regstered cars)

Most events dont need a secondary restraint for modern cars

1 question though,

With using a belt or the clips etc, what if theres a fire under the bonnet?

Be a bit hard to get them undone in time?

mind you though if there is a fire Id be out quick smart! but if a small,little fire started?

Despite the dual catch system std on modern cars the track days we do with the WRX club here in Vic state you need one. There are lots of ways you can do this.....bonnent pins are fine with a std bonnent, others use a belt strap fitted to a suitable spot and I use a wire cable attached to the frame of my bonnent which hooks to the radiator support.

  • 5 months later...

my advice is buy one of these babies. http://www.initialdrift.com.au/forums/view...074&start=0

cost about $25 and make sure you ask for it to be sheathed with the rubber heatshrink (stops it scratching up stuff). easy to fit, just need to drill a hole.

now that I've bought mine I just keep it in my helmet bag with licence and helmet etc so that I never forget to take it to a track day/sprint/whatever.

I'm surprised you need a secondary restraint for a skyline, its certainly not required in the CAMS regs (late model cars don't need an additional restraint). Unless it is requried by the supplementary regulations, I haven't seen them

Yeah some events now are starting to require them now even for late model cars. Up till now later model cars with an un-modified 2 stage factory catch have been ok, but for some reason of late it seems they are moving towards making all cars use a secondary restraint. Even a recent drift day I attended required all cars to have one and that is classed as a non-speed event!

Still for $25 and 5 mins drilling a hole it's not too onerous. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...