Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That was a really good watch!

.....eventhough the commentator called the GTR a 2.5L

yeah i was reading a mag that come out like a month ago(shoulda brought the thing dammit) that had an interview with jim richards and it started with 2.5L twin turbo :D maybe they were actually under the impression it was 2.5

he was also saying they were gonna put the gibson car in a couple of classic touring car races soon but didnt want to do to many to try and avoid damaging it and getting banned again. also there was a big spill about him saying they were his fav days of car racing :D id feel the same if i had to drive boring commos now aswell

yeah i was reading a mag that come out like a month ago(shoulda brought the thing dammit) that had an interview with jim richards and it started with 2.5L twin turbo :) maybe they were actually under the impression it was 2.5

he was also saying they were gonna put the gibson car in a couple of classic touring car races soon but didnt want to do to many to try and avoid damaging it and getting banned again. also there was a big spill about him saying they were his fav days of car racing :( id feel the same if i had to drive boring commos now aswell

The magazine in question is still on sale....

  • 1 month later...

Something to keep in mind.

Skyline Nationals Shepparton Vic.

On the Saturday (27th) is the show and shine including 2x GrpA Gibson GT-R's and an HR31, and a GrpC Exa.

On the Sunday (28th) there will be assorted Skylines doing the rounds of Winton raceway'

Including some of the above, definitely the HR31.

If you haven't heard one of the real deal HR31's before, it's a must. (they Hoooowl! :P)

Hooks

JB still rates this as the best car he has ever driven, which is saying a lot looking at his cars over the past few years.

Hehe, just saw that comment...

JB also rates the DR30 as one of the worst race cars he ever drove. Says a lot for Seton and Fury's ability.

Hoping not a repost..

Glenn Seton struggling with the DR30 in the semi wet

George Fury qualifying the DR30 as well

Bit of sierra love as well

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrUTUTohecE...feature=related

Youtube has HEAPS of video's of group a days and the like, very good for when your bored at work on a sunday evening :happy:

Edited by Boof
  • 2 weeks later...

I scanned the front and back cover of the Australian Motor Racing Year 1992/93 (Volume 22). The shot on the back is a good one of the Winfield girls, the banner and the car. Shows just how polished and professional the Winfield team were (not that any of us on these forums had any doubt).

post-9671-1210739724_thumb.jpg

post-9671-1210739820_thumb.jpg

Also a good opportunity to kick this thread going again. It is my favourite on the entire board.

  • 4 weeks later...

There is new models of these cars being brought out by biante..1:18 scale they have been approved development and waiting to be produced...

ATCC Winner 1990 - Jim Richards

post-8051-1213242392_thumb.jpg

Sandown 500 Winner 1991 - Gibbs/Onslow

post-8051-1213242402_thumb.jpg

ATCC Winner 1992- Mark Skaife

post-8051-1213242410_thumb.jpg

i dont think driving a 600hp V8 Supercar these days would be exactly boring, I think a massive powered group a GTR would be more of a challenge though.

Would be interesting to know. The GTR shoudl be better, simply because its AWD and the fact that it has better suspension design and it was designed as a sports car from the outset, then homologated to go racing. The Commodore obviously does not have that head start and so many parts/design aspects from the factory compromise them when they go racing. Though these days the shells are specifically built racing shells and lots of these short falls are addressed now that you no longer have to homologate the car.

Also, today's V8s often get some highly rated drivers jockeying them and they walk away sayign how difficult the cars are to drive, so much power, so little tyre and dynamically not that great a race car. Courtney is no doubt a great driver but it has taken him some time to learn how to drive them.

But i think the old banger 2L turbo cars would have been the hardest to get times out of over a race distance

I would disagree with that to an extent.

Basically whetever is remaining of the road cars in the V8 is there merely to make them look a little bit like what you can buy down the dealership. For instance the road car chassis not longer has any load bearing contribution - it is rivetted to the spaceframe rather than welded. Both the FG & the VE have different wheelbases & trackwidths than the road cars. The front quarter panels are fibreglass & not even close to the factory dimensions, rear door skins on the Commodores are now fibreglass too.

The suspension (paticularly the rear, live axle) was originally included because the VP & EB Falcons had live axles but mostly because they were cheap. Struts were used in the Commodores front ends, wishbones in the Falcons. Obviously now both front & rear V8 suspension packages bear no resemblance to anything leaving the factory.

My point is that is obviously difficult to drive the V8's well. You can see this by how many people struggle when they get into the series proper & by how many mistakes the development series drivers routinely make. I don't think that the difficulties are derived from the road cars - there isn't enough of them left to matter. I think it is a result of the regulations.

I would reckon any Group A car is by definition, more compromised by its factory origins than a V8.

I have finally uploaded my pictures from the 2007 Phillip Island Classic event, there are a heap of the GIO GT-R in there, plus a few other Group A cars:

http://photobucket.com/piclassic2007

You took photo's and didn't stop to say hello!. Great shots... stole a couple for my collection if it's OK.

Edited by Jetwreck

great find. race was won by a scot with an ausse co-driver in a british car on a japanese track, with an aussie in a commodore second. And to think Tony Cockhead thinks aussie motorsport is strong with the taxis. and the different strengths of the cars are great to see.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...