Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'm running 308rwkw through my 32r with no boost controller, hks gtss at about 18-19psi.

If you don't plan on changing the boost from high to low, then there is no need for one i guess.

or not concerned about response........, this high low thing is a real misconception and is not the reason i would purchase a boost controller... in fact mine never leaves high boost... i use my right foot to determine how fast i go..

With a correctley set up EBC you can get serious power gains throughout the initial stages due to the ebc's ability to hold back any pressure to the gates until the last possible moment. on average on a 300kw car i would hazard to guess you could get around 12-20 more kw in the mid with a decent ebc over the average manual bleeder.

ahh ok thanks trent..but for a fairly stock setup stage 2 mods do u reckon its enough?

n how come u didnt reply to my pm last nite :)

if you've already got it, use it. if your gonna buy it would consider something else.

checking PM's

the powerfc kit has a distinct advantage over the other units in that it enables boost correction on the maps

so it can back out timing, add in extra injection based on boost levels and so forth (if setup correctly)

it also is displayed on the hand controller

but i dont see why the pfc boost kit wont work - a fair few people use it

I've got one of these setup on my basic single turbo R33

I'm not saying you're wrong but this is the FIRST time ever i've heard of that feature on the FC-boost-add-on unit?

Boost correction? changing timing/injection depending on boost levels????

please elaborate?

I know tha AVC-R has boost levels depending on which gear you're in but that's about the most advanced feature of heard of?

But yeah, i reckon the add-on is great.

I think the so called shit myth...is a myth.

Anyone had personal bad experiences with em?

Also, if we're going to post how much power we're makng with which EBC, may as well state the boost level too which i think is relevant..

or better yet, a dyno sheet with the nice flat boost curve.

Me, i'm on the FC add on with 246rwks.....on 18psi.

Works fine including switching between 4 different boost settings.

Nice and descrete :)

I'm sure they're all good anyway.

Blitz SBC IdIII ftw.

Scouts honour ill post up boost response in a month or two.

the processor used in the MSIBC is bigger than that in the average microtech :)

LoL at MicroShite

2 examples of blown injector drivers and tracks that decide to just fall off the PCB

I've got one of these setup on my basic single turbo R33

I'm not saying you're wrong but this is the FIRST time ever i've heard of that feature on the FC-boost-add-on unit?

Boost correction? changing timing/injection depending on boost levels????

please elaborate?

I know tha AVC-R has boost levels depending on which gear you're in but that's about the most advanced feature of heard of?

But yeah, i reckon the add-on is great.

I think the so called shit myth...is a myth.

Anyone had personal bad experiences with em?

Also, if we're going to post how much power we're makng with which EBC, may as well state the boost level too which i think is relevant..

or better yet, a dyno sheet with the nice flat boost curve.

Me, i'm on the FC add on with 246rwks.....on 18psi.

Works fine including switching between 4 different boost settings.

Nice and descrete :)

I'm sure they're all good anyway.

hi bernie

if you are using the boost control kit with the powerFC or in fact just a map sensor connected to the powerfc then the "boost" map/correction points are enabled.

that is - if BOST is reading manifold pressure and is connected correctly - the correction ramps are activated automatically.

you can do this in two ways - one is by using the full powerfc boost kit - the other is buying the denso map sensor and connecting it up to the boost kit port (i have done this).

so on my car - i have the denso map sensor (same map sensor as the avcr or boost kit) and the wiring harness, but no solenoid. boost control on my pfc is disabled, but BOST has a reading as it can see the signal on the 3 pin boost kit port (white plug).

the following corrections are used when boost is readable by the FC

- inj vs airtemp and boost (max)

- inj vs water temp and boost (max)

- boost vs IGN S.F

Guys I appreciate this thread and the good info.

I would appreciate some feedback about the HKS EVC 5.......pros & cons and where it fits in with the others mentioned here.

I'm running a PFC with bigger turbos & fuel setup, etc.

GIZZMO MSiBC best bang for buck, good enough to take out dspeeds boost controller choice... and it is run on their 1000hp GTR, i use alot of these things for guys who want killer boost control but on a budget..... the processor used in the MSIBC is bigger than that in the average microtech :P

http://www.gizzmoelectronics.com/Product_MSIBC.html

who sell them and how much are we looking at?

who sell them and how much are we looking at?

Dont know where else sell them, but good old ebay has them:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-MS-IBC-Multi...7QQcmdZViewItem

$550+$12.50delivery

and there's a cheaper one:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-Intelligent-...7QQcmdZViewItem

$399+$15delivery

No im not a seller, im actually trying to figure out which is the best coost controller myself. Is the IBC just as good as the MS-IBC just with a lower boost range? or is the a more significant difference?

Dont know where else sell them, but good old ebay has them:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-MS-IBC-Multi...7QQcmdZViewItem

$550+$12.50delivery

and there's a cheaper one:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-Intelligent-...7QQcmdZViewItem

$399+$15delivery

No im not a seller, im actually trying to figure out which is the best coost controller myself. Is the IBC just as good as the MS-IBC just with a lower boost range? or is the a more significant difference?

Those Ebay prices are above RRP......

Dont know where else sell them, but good old ebay has them:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-MS-IBC-Multi...7QQcmdZViewItem

$550+$12.50delivery

and there's a cheaper one:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/GIZZMO-Intelligent-...7QQcmdZViewItem

$399+$15delivery

No im not a seller, im actually trying to figure out which is the best coost controller myself. Is the IBC just as good as the MS-IBC just with a lower boost range? or is the a more significant difference?

The MS-IBC has an additional multi scramble setiing very similar to that of the AVCR except you can repress the sramble button within the initial sramble setting and increase the sramble time where as with the avcr you must wait for the initial sramble feature to expire before you can repress.

IMO you cannot look past the gizzmo IBC for bang for buck it is extremely easy to connect and quite simple to set up, with 4 settings, holds boost well and has an excellent gain setting. these are usually on the shelf for around $400 at autobarn and have even seen them as cheap as $270

I have found in the past that using bleed taps will be subject to boost spikes and factuating pressures

Edited by green 33

Cheers guys....

Gizzmo looks good also....

Ill talk to my tuner again and see which one he knows most also. Cos i guess its beeter for him to tune my car with things he knows well? Or are they all the same just different quality?

:P

I would not be trusting a $22 ebay bleed valve to adequately control boost on a modified R33 GTR.

All do respect Blitz, it's not a bleed valve, it doesn't bleed any air at all. It's a ball bearing valve, which works exactly the same way most expensive EBC work.

Crack up a Blitz Spec R and a Spec S...

you will that the Spec R utilises ball bearing valve and the Spec S is just a bleed valve.

All do respect Blitz, it's not a bleed valve, it doesn't bleed any air at all. It's a ball bearing valve, which works exactly the same way most expensive EBC work.

Crack up a Blitz Spec R and a Spec S...

you will that the Spec R utilises ball bearing valve and the Spec S is just a bleed valve.

hahahahaha. sorry but your way off the mark about the EBC's but BLITZ was right about your $22 ebay jobbie.... is still a bleed valve.

i have got multiple valves here as i repair blown PFC's, ecu's and boost controllers of all makes and models.....

the blitz Spec R uses two (solenoids closed/atmos) spec s solenoids mounted parrallel in the housing.... there is no spring an ball :nyaanyaa: the duty rate is 100% electronic there are no mechanical (springs) determining spring seat pressure like a bleed vlave...

All decent bleed valves (turbosmart, turbotech etc) are spring/ ball bearing valves and rely on a predetermined spring pressure to increase the time the valve is seated prior to reaching target boost. These ball type valves are dumb and rely PURELY on this spring pressure. Electronic ones run real time and constantly monitor boost and only crack the actuator at the very last moment someting even the best ball and seat thype bleeder can not even come close to doing.

the reason the Spec r is the best is because the twin valves actually allow the valve to hold shut longer than comparable controllers due to having twice the capacity (now your basic setup doesnt need it but twins, big gates or conditions like drift which change the load ALOT benefit from it) once at set boost it cracks open both valves and starts pulsing duty to maintain boost, twin solenoids give DOUBLE the resolution of any other controller therefore it can make adjustments to boost at twice the speed of any other EBC.... it is pure and simple pyhsics.

that is the only reason i use BLITZ controllers (and i have access to all brands), i dont use older HKS EBC valves as they are like you posted an electronic screw type bleeder.

yeah BEER BARON the greddy profec b is a favorite too :P if i cant get my hands on a R or IDIII i will fit or ask the customer to supply a B :(

And finally :blush: the PFC boost controller (mind you im a PFC fan) is very average (fine on simple small upgrades) it has no gain adjustment and the only thing going for it is te abilty to adjust boost via the handset... they suck hardcore in decent twin gtr applications.

post-34927-1202871243_thumb.jpg

I'm interested in using the powerfc to handle the boost.

Did it work ok? CAn you go into more detail?

I'd just prefer less crap in the car. (Head unit for 3rd party boost controllers) - the Powerfc uses the Handcontroller which I think is more convenient.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...