Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-60709-0-21525000-1321772249_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-29263900-1321772271_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-71176500-1321772290_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-42690800-1321772322_thumb.jpg

unsure what looks better, it was on there when I bought it and just left it. see what people think, id never put one on the rear as thatd be try hard- just figured its part of the gtr front so i never removed it.:blink:

if it had a 26 in it i could understand but otherwise it just looks stupid

edit: id get rid of the centre caps on the wheels too, mainly coz i rekon they look better without

post-60709-0-21525000-1321772249_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-29263900-1321772271_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-71176500-1321772290_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-42690800-1321772322_thumb.jpg

unsure what looks better, it was on there when I bought it and just left it. see what people think, id never put one on the rear as thatd be try hard- just figured its part of the gtr front so i never removed it.:blink:

Forget where I saw you, was out North on South Road. Didnt even notice the GTR front TBH, just the badge. Looks fine with it off, and I agree, also take the center caps off the rims, looks nice all completly black. Looked bloody nice, just looked silly with the badge on it.

Spotted yellow Stag parked infront on Nisswreck around lunch time today.

Black 34 4dr with agrevate on the plates, cant remember how it was spelt. South Road and Sturt Road around 12.30ish.

And a very low, very nice red 31, rolling on black rims, nicest 31 I've seen around for a while. About 3 this afternoon heading towards Colonnades.

Oh and a blue 180 in Nisswreck, damn nice!

Black 34 near pt road or glenosmond? If so that was me. Iv taken that badge off then on and off and on and haven't decided what to do with it- the whole front is genuine gtr front and it doesn't quiet look right without the badge so I put it back on. It's running gtr rims, mfd, steering wheel and they all have the factory gtr logo also...What do others reckon about the badge-keep or remove?

Do you own a GT-R or a GT-T? No matter what bits from a GT-R you've added, its still not a GT-R. Keep it off, looks great without it tbh. Plus if someone in a 34 GT-R pulls up next to you how you going to feel?

post-60709-0-21525000-1321772249_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-29263900-1321772271_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-71176500-1321772290_thumb.jpgpost-60709-0-42690800-1321772322_thumb.jpg

unsure what looks better, it was on there when I bought it and just left it. see what people think, id never put one on the rear as thatd be try hard- just figured its part of the gtr front so i never removed it.:blink:

Looks better with the badge on, its a GTR front anyway.

Spotted blk R34 GTR on Pultney St, white 34 GTT on Gouger st... @ lunch today

spotted dohmar last night bout 5:15 coming out of mawson lakes onto montague,

i was on montague heading towards main north from port wakefield rd in my cooner champagne r31 with way to many stickers on it haha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...