Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Like wise, did you stay for the dyno runs?

i stayed to watch yours then we left just after you, mates wrx is stuffed, been driving around with a shit tune for 7 months running 25psi standard bottom end :( so he wasnt in the mood to hang around.

if you dont end up with atleast 550hp atw with that combo, your not trying hard enough haha

30675_400620327104_664212104_446615.jpg

thats from my evo with a 2.2 stroker and gt35 .63 rear housing..

I've always liked the evo's over the wrx...ever since I saw footage of that black/red time attack evo from japan :( what a monsta!

If I ever was forced to sell my gtr I'd get an evo (or an r35gtr lol), what do they weigh? With the power ur making it would be fun hehe

marko i hope the greddy pump ive got will pump as hard as you ...lol

sorry nick hrr hrrm...i think u have mistaken me for 1 of your greek mates

whats the difference between the nitto and N1 pump?

n1's break & nitto's dont :thumbsup: sadly, that is the difference, oh & the nitto runs a billet gear

sorry nick hrr hrrm...i think u have mistaken me for 1 of your greek mates

n1's break & nitto's dont :domokun: sadly, that is the difference, oh & the nitto runs a billet gear

lol well im 50 greek and 50 your mob so no i was thinking of you....zabra

Have been in an EVO running a twin scroll 1.06a/r GT3582R, the spool is seriously seriously impressive.... I have a .82a/r GT3076R and I'd honestly not expect to feel too much compromise going to a T4 GT35R.

How big was the engine in it Lithium? Pump fuel?

I've been dicked with this Precision turbo I ordered due to a core change, they can't offer me a 0.84 TS T4 so I was thinking a 1.06 but a bit scared, wanted to start small.

Should be cruising next Friday Dave, Kyle lent me a T04Z with a 0.70 divided for now, expecting it to be powerful and lazy...

How big was the engine in it Lithium? Pump fuel?

I've been dicked with this Precision turbo I ordered due to a core change, they can't offer me a 0.84 TS T4 so I was thinking a 1.06 but a bit scared, wanted to start small.

Oh, now I know what I was talking about. The EVO I was referring to in this post is an EVO 5 running a "2.4litre" stroker and it is basically a torque monster. The one I referred to in my PM in response to you runs a 2litre in an EVO 2 and is obviously not so mental from low revs but still has a well broad power delivery.

The 2litre is 18psi by 4500rpm, the 2.4 hasn't been dyno tuned yet but feels like hell has opened up by 4000rpm - they both run BP98.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...