Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had the same problem with my car, exhaust tone was nice but after driving it for 20min u get over it pretty quickly (its a sign of old age, I like to call it maturity lol)

Besides that, when the exhaust db drops, u get to hear more engine noise which is a major plus.

Wont be making the drag day, still need to make changes for it to be road worthy. As the car has been pulled apart and off the road for so long, Adam suggested that the car as a whole needs a few K's put on it just to see if there is anything that needs attention.

So far 200rwkw@10psi 5000rpm. Makes more power and torque everywhere. Feels strong.

Ordered my new plates too :)

RB25/30

Ported head

HKS 256/264 cams

Tomei springs

Nitto headgasket

Nitto/JE pistons

Nitto I beam rods

Block mods

etc etc etc

GT35R.82

6boost manifold

4inch dump

4inch exhaust

I hope the rear housing will be big enough.

RB25/30

Ported head

HKS 256/264 cams

Tomei springs

Nitto headgasket

Nitto/JE pistons

Nitto I beam rods

Block mods

etc etc etc

GT35R.82

6boost manifold

4inch dump

4inch exhaust

I hope the rear housing will be big enough.

Cheers, and I am sure it will be fine... for some reason I thought you were going GTX

Ffs dont waste your time and money with the .82 housing Dave. It will only end in tears.

At the very least use a 1.06 housing and even then dont tune it without egt sensors.

You setup is almost a mirror of mine and the 33 racer car. I wont tell you how any 35r's came to grief between the 2 engines before we woke up. Using the .82 is like f**king for virginity, You wont get the desired result.

Ffs dont waste your time and money with the .82 housing Dave. It will only end in tears.

At the very least use a 1.06 housing and even then dont tune it without egt sensors.

You setup is almost a mirror of mine and the 33 racer car. I wont tell you how any 35r's came to grief between the 2 engines before we woke up. Using the .82 is like f**king for virginity, You wont get the desired result.

What Noel said mate! :)

But if you do manage over 400 with the .82 ill be impressed, especially if the backpressure isnt stupid and you can keep egts below 800c and stop the turbo from shitting itself the first time you go do a track day.

What Noel said mate! :)

But if you do manage over 400 with the .82 ill be impressed, especially if the backpressure isnt stupid and you can keep egts below 800c and stop the turbo from shitting itself the first time you go do a track day.

he did manage to pull over 400 on the RB25. topped out at 429kw from memory?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...