Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After changing (years ago) from a slightly modded GTST, standard ECU, to an un-tuned Power FC....

I obvisouly noticed a better midrange in power and better drivabilty overall.....even before tuned...and even better after!

My question is this,

If i have a, lets say, a 2000yr, 1.8 Corolla, is it worth adding a piggy back to punch in some extra timing and getting that better feal?

Would it work?

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

What are your thoughts?

NA cars won't lean out as easily as a turbo car, so they don't have to be as careful with the tune I guess. There are always things you can do with an NA though, like advancing the timing for instance.

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

All OEM cars are tuned conservatively. You can always find a little extra by tuning the ECU, especially if you're willing to always run it on a higher octane fuel. Then there's removing inherent restrictions like the intake and exhaust if you're willing to put up with a bit more noise.

As for whether its "worth" it, its up to you. You'll still need to spend money on it, and you won't see the gains you would on an FI car. If you have to have more punch and you can afford it, then do it. But I get the feeling you've got better things to spend your money on than getting a handful of fwkW on a $600 outlay with an A'PEXi S-AFC.

I had a very clean EF falcon.It was one of my most enjoyable cars.

Full exhuast

Headers

XR ECU and fuel reg

Cam

Valve springs

Lowered springs

KYB shocks

Nice wheels

I wish i never sold it. :P

Not the fastest thing in the world,but it sounded horn and was a great drive.I only mod inline 6s though.4s dont do it for me.

Its definitely worth it You will see roughly 14+kw gain from intake + exhaust

Sky is the limit. plenty of go fast bits for them! more than enough market and experience out there

twincam.net will be the best place to ask around :P

I love the power delivery and throttle response from my z...

but nothing compares to the rush when the skyline's on boost :P .

Most n/a 4 banger posers add a cannon and leave it at that.

I would do;

2.5" exhaust

good size extractors (not too large)

hi flow panel filter

adjustable cams

decent Air/Fuel management

in the end its going to be a 1.8 corolla, put a better flowing exhaust on it, filter, spend some money on suspension parts and put some nice work rims on it....

no point in modding the engine with a computer etc to get 5extra fwkw

i had an r33 gts-4 non-turbo with the rb25de engine

it had pod, zorst and unichip ecu which made a ridiculously pathetic 78awkw!

a full 2kw gain for 900bux

:laughing-smiley-014:

Thanks for all your replies.

I guess i was hoping for some sort of easy piggy back ECU that could easily be tuned from the passenger seat....leaving AFR's and punching in an extra 5' of timing or something for $500??

I'm more interested in an increase in low-midrange torque feal, upgrades.

Not interested in top output power ( i guess i shoulda stated that earlier)

Thinking i'll just leave it as is.

Cheers big ears.

Birnie :P

After changing (years ago) from a slightly modded GTST, standard ECU, to an un-tuned Power FC....

I obvisouly noticed a better midrange in power and better drivabilty overall.....even before tuned...and even better after!

My question is this,

If i have a, lets say, a 2000yr, 1.8 Corolla, is it worth adding a piggy back to punch in some extra timing and getting that better feal?

Would it work?

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

What are your thoughts?

It's like giving a fat boy a pair of Nikes and asking him to run quickly... won't happen. So why bother?

worth tuning an NA car? it's not even worth driving one.... :D

ok ok.. some of us haven't earned our boost wings yet. I'm glad my first car was a charade i probably would have killed myself in anything quicker :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...