Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After changing (years ago) from a slightly modded GTST, standard ECU, to an un-tuned Power FC....

I obvisouly noticed a better midrange in power and better drivabilty overall.....even before tuned...and even better after!

My question is this,

If i have a, lets say, a 2000yr, 1.8 Corolla, is it worth adding a piggy back to punch in some extra timing and getting that better feal?

Would it work?

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

What are your thoughts?

NA cars won't lean out as easily as a turbo car, so they don't have to be as careful with the tune I guess. There are always things you can do with an NA though, like advancing the timing for instance.

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

All OEM cars are tuned conservatively. You can always find a little extra by tuning the ECU, especially if you're willing to always run it on a higher octane fuel. Then there's removing inherent restrictions like the intake and exhaust if you're willing to put up with a bit more noise.

As for whether its "worth" it, its up to you. You'll still need to spend money on it, and you won't see the gains you would on an FI car. If you have to have more punch and you can afford it, then do it. But I get the feeling you've got better things to spend your money on than getting a handful of fwkW on a $600 outlay with an A'PEXi S-AFC.

I had a very clean EF falcon.It was one of my most enjoyable cars.

Full exhuast

Headers

XR ECU and fuel reg

Cam

Valve springs

Lowered springs

KYB shocks

Nice wheels

I wish i never sold it. :P

Not the fastest thing in the world,but it sounded horn and was a great drive.I only mod inline 6s though.4s dont do it for me.

Its definitely worth it You will see roughly 14+kw gain from intake + exhaust

Sky is the limit. plenty of go fast bits for them! more than enough market and experience out there

twincam.net will be the best place to ask around :P

I love the power delivery and throttle response from my z...

but nothing compares to the rush when the skyline's on boost :P .

Most n/a 4 banger posers add a cannon and leave it at that.

I would do;

2.5" exhaust

good size extractors (not too large)

hi flow panel filter

adjustable cams

decent Air/Fuel management

in the end its going to be a 1.8 corolla, put a better flowing exhaust on it, filter, spend some money on suspension parts and put some nice work rims on it....

no point in modding the engine with a computer etc to get 5extra fwkw

i had an r33 gts-4 non-turbo with the rb25de engine

it had pod, zorst and unichip ecu which made a ridiculously pathetic 78awkw!

a full 2kw gain for 900bux

:laughing-smiley-014:

Thanks for all your replies.

I guess i was hoping for some sort of easy piggy back ECU that could easily be tuned from the passenger seat....leaving AFR's and punching in an extra 5' of timing or something for $500??

I'm more interested in an increase in low-midrange torque feal, upgrades.

Not interested in top output power ( i guess i shoulda stated that earlier)

Thinking i'll just leave it as is.

Cheers big ears.

Birnie :P

After changing (years ago) from a slightly modded GTST, standard ECU, to an un-tuned Power FC....

I obvisouly noticed a better midrange in power and better drivabilty overall.....even before tuned...and even better after!

My question is this,

If i have a, lets say, a 2000yr, 1.8 Corolla, is it worth adding a piggy back to punch in some extra timing and getting that better feal?

Would it work?

Are NA standard cars already at their optimum or are they running super safe where you could squeeze some extra omph outta them?

What are your thoughts?

It's like giving a fat boy a pair of Nikes and asking him to run quickly... won't happen. So why bother?

worth tuning an NA car? it's not even worth driving one.... :D

ok ok.. some of us haven't earned our boost wings yet. I'm glad my first car was a charade i probably would have killed myself in anything quicker :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HyperGear. Just get a high flow of the stocker. Good, reliable, and should bolt on. Yes it will want things like a retune once done, so you need to factor this in to your spend too.
    • Hi. Iam looking for some "cheaper" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO. I do not want "big" power just better reliability than the stock turbo which is "fot now" good but is old and i do not think it has "easy" life. One the Skyline here running some "temu" china Turbo but i dont trust those... Thanks!  
    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
×
×
  • Create New...