Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

fwaah, chek out the 32GTR in the bground...now that looks sweet!

:) you can't argue with motor sport pedigree! :rolleyes:

Whens the last time you say a 33gtst racing in Group A! Oh hang on, never saw a 32gtst run there either....

damn, that pintara is looking attractive now. CA20e's aren't they?

But the RB20 won the SATCC in 1990, and won several JTCC. That engine ended up in the R32, save the manifold and turbo. Neither the RB25 or R33 had done anyting except cruise Oxford Street with Pin Pearl paint, 20" chrmoies and yellow leather interior :blink:

Stop finding flaws in my nonsense rambling, it isnt meant to make sense :P

Dont S2 R33s have that tacky clith interior? They do look nicer then the S1 though. And the interior, just like the exterior is very much a matter of taste as the R33 is too Camry for me. Then again teh R32 is very VN Commodore :bunny:

I happen to have driven these 3... 1st car was 91 VN, 2nd 02 Camry & finally a 93 R33 ... what are the chances...

& to the OP, if you are coming from a Excel, then even a push bike is probably an upgrade from that... LOL :laugh: .

GL with your skyline.

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

thats the best looking fridge i have ever seen! Who left it in the car park :laugh: nice looking washing machine in the back ground too.

Team white goods?

Wait! i have a better one: Just cos your car is too big to fit in a parking slot, doesn't mean you can take 3 :bunny:

have i mentioned this thread has out lived it's usefulness?

Edited by BHDave
to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? ;)

speaking for myself and alot like my friends, we always prefered the shape of the R32 before we owned one.

tuff street style. but hey, that's us. we're all different.

everyone on here knows the RB25 is better stock to stock. newer technology, better response with bigger turbos, and can acheive a higher power rating.

everyone has their personal preference. i know if i wanted to go out and get higher in the power figures i would use an RB25.. even over an RB26. but i've got what i've got, and it surely does what i want it to do with ease.

we own RB engines, so we should be arguing with SR or CA owners, not ourselves.

my point was that the main argument from R32 owners is that 'R33's look shit' which is a stupid thing to say because its personal taste. if the worst thing they can say about an R33 is that it looks shit, then it must be a pretty good car. end of story.

"lets be frank: our 33V-Spec looks like a boat against the other three. It's the least aggressive in its styling and more closely cut from the generic Skyline cloth..."

- Motor Magazine, May 2008

article: r32 v r33 v r34 v r35 (gtrs)

lol...

MOTOR, the Holden specialists :thumbsup:

Thats a nice lookin gtst.. and it looks like a gtst but the color suits it perfectly.. :P

In my opinion, and i said it wayyy back in this thread.. i dont like R33's. i prefer the r32 LOOKS wise..

R33 is faster than the R32, is newer and blah blah blah.. R32 with rb25/26 is the best option i reckon because i love the look of the R32. but thats my personal opinion

As for my "blown" motor.. it never blew champ :) 1 of the turbos exploded

A couple pieces of the wheel managed to somehow go back into the engine and score the bores. no biggie :(

GTR front bar without the lip?? looks different lol but good

or other front bar.. whatever it is it looks nice, but we had a nice clean White R33 GTR @ work the other day... only had a set of wheels and it looked Gold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...