Jump to content
SAU Community

Haltech R35 Gt-r Dyno & Drag Results Thread


Recommended Posts

11.1 and 126mph from a car that weighs 1740kg, and has had no mechanical changes, is nothing short of staggering.

all hail the new king of performance cars

Maybe the new ecu is a cuppla hundred kg lighter than the factory jobbie. :banana::teehee:

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

fantastic result for first time out!!

i remember being happy when my evo ran 12.4 with autronic, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, aps cold air induction, etc

boost incease and tune & 11.1 @ 124 excellent! 10's are coming very soon

So what happens when they make some more adjustments to the tuning and on a good warm day it runs a 10.9sec and they are forced to put a cage in it, will they?

Because it can't be more than a month away before it does run a 10sec pass but I can't see them wanting to strip out a perfect good R35 just to run another 10sec pass.

Its interesting that it had a higher trap speed on the third run, without the correct launch control (which as far as I understand is just the equivalent of dumping the clutch in a manual). I wonder what happened there...

very impressive especially considering that it's running street tyres. imagine what gains there would be with some semi slicks or even better some proper drag radials. :)

I think it might be a bit of a challenge fitting the 255/50/16 radials over those gi-normous brakes. :)

But running a 10 with basic mods on factory rubber and stock everything else including exhaust is phenominal. Just shows you how well this car has been designed and engineered.

Sign me up...

though I don't know if an owner would want to modify a street driven one it while its still under factory warranty if it will void the warranty... what do you guys think?

Depends on how cashed up they are?

If the purchase price was the absolute max they could afford, then I guess they wouldn't.

However, if $$$ aren't a major factor then anything goes...

Yeah definately with that mile on the third run it would have been a 10 second pass!, our first 10 pass was 10.8@ 129 mph

so the haltech gtr with a good launch is already capable of 10's. excellent result.

Edited by giant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...