Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry for reviving old thread but in search of building a responsive setup too, bought the car with GT2860-5 already which i find laggy but don't want to go to the hassle of replacing the turbo's with say a -7 or -9, recently bought Tomei cam gears hoping to get a tune soon with those and get abit more torque low end, car currently makes 262KW, not searching for power atm, response is my main goal for now, any suggestions?

Mods are:

Arc airbox with Stock AFM

Power FC

GT2860-5

700cc injectors

HKS exhaust

Tomei Cam gears

Thanks

Sorry for reviving old thread but in search of building a responsive setup too, bought the car with GT2860-5 already which i find laggy but don't want to go to the hassle of replacing the turbo's with say a -7 or -9, recently bought Tomei cam gears hoping to get a tune soon with those and get abit more torque low end, car currently makes 262KW, not searching for power atm, response is my main goal for now, any suggestions?

Cam gears and a good tune might net you ~300rpm but that'll be best case scenario really at the end of the day.

Overall the only two 'simple' options to improve the response is capacity or downsizing turbos.

Thanks for the reply, will put up a post soon to see if someone wants to swap -5's for -9 or -7's with cash adjustment depending on condition of my turbo's as i don't know what condition they are in, obviously not expecting brand new -7's or -9's haha.

Keep in mind that was with stock cams too with -9's.

My tomei type b's I'm running now were a bit of a disappointment down low for off idle to 3000 rpm response.

I was surprised how good the stock cams are!

  • 3 weeks later...

Got advised there won't be much difference if i swapped out the -5's for -7 or -9, will just waste my money since i already have the -5's in, so adding tomei cam gears, tomei poncams, arp head studs, and valve springs, hopefully after a tune it will sharpen response abit more than it is now :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...