Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With keeping with the terms of SAU I won't say openly who but I have just had the worst encounter with a parts seller. In a nut shell I bought a gearbox off these people and during the build of my car it was put in and found to be stuck in gear so I rang them and discussed what they wanted to do. They suggested I just have someone look at it as these things are simple and "minor" but it turned out the gearbox was completely f**ked! Now they don't want to have anything to do with it saying they gave no permission to go down the path I pursued with the box and yadda yadda yadda! I now know I should of just sent the thing back and said replace it and now I'm in an even more difficult situation but the bottom line is these guys took my 1800 for a box and sent me a box of metal with a stick sticking out the top and think they don't have an obligation to repair or replace it. I may or may not pursue this further as under implied warranty they are obligated to actually sell me a product that works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PM me for the name of the company cause people need to steer clear of this shit hole!

much love guys :ninja:

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it's supposed to be the whole reason that people buy anything secondhand from businesses- to have some sort of recourse if the parts are faulty.

stick it to 'em as hard as you can if they wanna continue to try and stooge you.

PM to please mate.

And more importantly don't back down. Places like that will give that line to 10 customers, and if 5/10 just pack up and walk off they have saved themselves a sh!t load of money.

Stick with it and get what you paid for.

If it doesn't work as soon as you get it, always take it back to the retailer rather than a third party so they can't fob you off with a "oh, your other guy must've broken it" bullcrap.

Still, the Trade Practices Act will back you up. If you get this other mechanic to say "It was broken when I inspected it", plus with your statement that it was borked before and you called them up and they said to go elsewhere, they'll need far better lawyers than yours to worm out of it as the balance of probability is in your favour.

Edited by scathing

SAME THING happened when my journal bearing hiflow from a 'trusted' trader shit itself. i took it to GCG and they pretty much said "yep.. its farked".

Can I suggest the Department of Fair Trading if you have exhausted all other avenues?

department of fair trading told me to take it to court after they contacted the trader.

If it doesn't work as soon as you get it, always take it back to the retailer rather than a third party so they can't fob you off with a "oh, your other guy must've broken it" bullcrap.

Still, the Trade Practices Act will back you up. If you get this other mechanic to say "It was broken when I inspected it", plus with your statement that it was borked before and you called them up and they said to go elsewhere, they'll need far better lawyers than yours to worm out of it as the balance of probability is in your favour.

i took mine back to the trader and they said it was fine. put it back on my car and it was still farked. after i took it to the 3rd party, GCG (at the trader's request), i was told that for sending it to them i had voided my warranty.... wtf!!

i know what you're going through mate. lots of dodgy traders out there. ring the department of fair trading. they wont really get much done but the courts will at least appreciate that you've tried to explore another avenue of resolution before taking it to court.

PM me the workshop name too please.

havnt read the whole thread but..

section 75 (i think) of the TPA - Implied terms

The purchased good must:

1. be of merchantible quality;

2. fit its given description; and

3. be fit for its purpose.

section 53 'prohibits a corporation from making a misleading representation concerning any warranty or condition.'

confirm, not 100% on the section numbers (going by what i learnt last year), but what they cover is correct.

You definitely have a case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...