Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its been covered once before but no harm in bringing it up again

engine is rb30 (not sure if extra height makes a diff)

chassis is r33 gts

current setup is ITS T66 with 0.7 comp

snug fit, room for a bit more

i want to go atleast gt35, preferablily gt40 and still use the low mount setup

i need pics of what turbo your using pls and its fitment

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/230792-biggest-turbo-using-hks-low-mount/
Share on other sites

its been covered once before but no harm in bringing it up again

engine is rb30 (not sure if extra height makes a diff)

chassis is r33 gts

current setup is ITS T66 with 0.7 comp

snug fit, room for a bit more

i want to go atleast gt35, preferablily gt40 and still use the low mount setup

i need pics of what turbo your using pls and its fitment

thanks

If ITS is anything like Garrett, a T66 is bigger than a GT35R - so you will be downgrading if you went to a GT35R. A Garrett T04Z will fit in that location though I wouldn't be too sure a GT40R would.

If you mean the HKS low mount cast split pulse manifold with the external gate mount on top there are interesting possibilities .

If you look at the turbo mounting "pad" you'll see that it's big enough for the full sized T04/TA45 foot print , HKS used the smaller split T3 (correctly speaking T4 Euro) stud pattern and twin outlets .

I used to have pics of one of these manifolds redrilled/tapped and ported for the large T4 type turbine housing footprint .

Your call but I would be wary of using huge turbos on RB25's, would work better on a 25/30 but not really a race type valve train .

HKS also did one for RB26 heads and they were big T4 flanged and intended for a bigish dinosaur TA45S . The modern equal turbo wise would probably be a GT4088R .

A .

If you look at the turbo mounting "pad" you'll see that it's big enough for the full sized T04/TA45 foot print , HKS used the smaller split T3 (correctly speaking T4 Euro) stud pattern and twin outlets .

I used to have pics of one of these manifolds redrilled/tapped and ported for the large T4 type turbine housing footprint .

Mine has the 'dual' drilled and tapped positions. I used the T3 and a GT3076 WG [popular choice for many]. And yes, in theory you could use the T4 footprint for a bigger turbo, but tI wouldn't like to port match the T4 footprint to the turbo [assuming the T4 has a larger throat]. To do that I would guess you'd firstly have to build up the outside with cast weld to strengthen and thicken the metal.

If you didn't do this I'm estimating/guessing you'd almost certainly break out, or thin the metal that much it would be too weak and fracture/burn away.

By the way, the limiting factor isn't the turbo size, there is plenty of room all round, its the turbo inlet size. I have a 100mm unit and had to cut back the front engine mount for clearance. I actually thought of refacing the mounting position ie cut the T3 mounting face back at an angle [say 5 degree's], this would swing the turbo mouth out a bit, but then you have the stud holes, so you would have to weld them up and retap square to the new face etc. I don't think this would have affected flow, the manifold casting [tubing] is still at a slight angle as it drops to the T3 face - but then I got lazy and left it. Now its on and I CBF, its working, I'm driving, thats it.

If you mean the HKS low mount cast split pulse manifold with the external gate mount on top there are interesting possibilities .

If you look at the turbo mounting "pad" you'll see that it's big enough for the full sized T04/TA45 foot print , HKS used the smaller split T3 (correctly speaking T4 Euro) stud pattern and twin outlets .

I used to have pics of one of these manifolds redrilled/tapped and ported for the large T4 type turbine housing footprint .

Your call but I would be wary of using huge turbos on RB25's, would work better on a 25/30 but not really a race type valve train .

HKS also did one for RB26 heads and they were big T4 flanged and intended for a bigish dinosaur TA45S . The modern equal turbo wise would probably be a GT4088R .

A .

I have the same HKS manifold & gate as mentioned with Garret T04E turbo, it is quite a tight fit that the engine mounting had to be modified using RB20 engine mounts with spacer plates to match the height. Any chance the T04Z would fit, cos i really like that turbo. Not interested to go top mount cos heard that they do crack due to the weight.

I have the same HKS manifold & gate as mentioned with Garret T04E turbo, it is quite a tight fit that the engine mounting had to be modified using RB20 engine mounts with spacer plates to match the height. Any chance the T04Z would fit, cos i really like that turbo. Not interested to go top mount cos heard that they do crack due to the weight.

Poor Quality Stainless Steel High mount Manifolds will crack.

Good quality Stainless ones are not as likely to crack if setup correctly.

Steam pipe manifolds ie. ETM/6BOOST are preety much guaranteed not to crack and will probably flow alot better than any of the lowmount style manifolds

Trident I had a feeling the HKS cast manifolds port sizing would be the limiting factor .

HKS would have known that and gone straight to the real T4 flange/port dimensions on the RB26 spec single turbo split pulse low mount manifold . The one I looked at certainly looked like it meant business anyway .

A while back FullRace Geoff did mention a power figure at which the T4 Euro split port flange size (commonly known as "split T3") becomes a restriction . The ports through this smaller flange can only be made so big and eventually with enough exhaust flow becomes limiting - regardless of what A/R housing or turbo is bolted to it .

Don't forget that most Garrett T4 (Euro or the larger "T4 International" type) housings are made for Diseasils which have lower EGT's and are usually low reving things .

Garrett only went as far as the GT3582R and the "T3" footprint , their marketed version of the T04Z (same cartridge as HKS units) can arguably use split Euro or split International T4 flanged housings but really they are intended for diesels . The T04Z cartridge is a modified P trim/60-1 cartridge - uses the BCI-8D (T04R) compressor wheel .

Note HKS used a split T4 International flanged turbine housing that merges into one volute passage .

I think a GT3582R in its largest A/R turbine housing (1.06) should be able to go to the limit of that HKS RB20/25 cast manifold .

A .

Poor Quality Stainless Steel High mount Manifolds will crack.

Good quality Stainless ones are not as likely to crack if setup correctly.

Steam pipe manifolds ie. ETM/6BOOST are preety much guaranteed not to crack and will probably flow alot better than any of the lowmount style manifolds

A friend 34GTR with high mount T67 Trust kit had leaks due to cracks in the manifold. not sure which part but he eventually fabricated a totally new using better material stainless and much thicker too. Though the weight now is pretty heavy.

  • 1 month later...
  • 9 years later...

Hello, I know this is a major resurrection of a thread, but does anyone have any new experiences with ow mounting big singles. I see hypertune has a big low mounted single in their S15, and the RIPS R34 borg has a medium sized low mount turbo. Im interested in low mounting an EFR 8374, but cant seem to find much info on people low mounting big singles.

Low mounting a 8374 is lol. It is a huge turbo, in the context of low mounting one in a RB.


My 7670 was much, much, much larger than a GTX3582 and that was a squeeze to low mount. (The GTX3582, the 7670 low mounting was a non-option)

The answer on low mounting a single nowdays would have to be the Garrett G series - They are much more compact for the power they put out. Definitely 100% without any doubt ever that is the turbo you want to get if for some reason you demand it to be low mounted.

Thanks man, I should divulge that my car is not a skyline or an S chassis, so I may have more room to work with.. Id really like to see your low mounted gt35 if you were willing to send me a picture. As much as id like to try the G series, I cant seem to find any info on them, which is surprising. I figured of all people, the GTR guys would be all over these. I dont know what they compare to in size to previous Garrets, and I am unsure of what they compare too in response/spool on a 2.6 RB. The output is plenty im sure. 

19 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

Low mounting a 8374 is lol. It is a huge turbo, in the context of low mounting one in a RB.


My 7670 was much, much, much larger than a GTX3582 and that was a squeeze to low mount. (The GTX3582, the 7670 low mounting was a non-option)

The answer on low mounting a single nowdays would have to be the Garrett G series - They are much more compact for the power they put out. Definitely 100% without any doubt ever that is the turbo you want to get if for some reason you demand it to be low mounted.

 

aGnslE8l.jpg

Nwf6ImDl.jpg

Edited by DiscardTheWeak
Just now, iruvyouskyrine said:

Are you specifically using the cast HKS low mount?

I have a custom low mount manifold made that currently runs an EFR6758 but fits an EFR 8374/9180 with ease in my RB20 S15.

No, I am not using the HKS manifold. I would very much appreciate pictures of your setup, as it would help alot. The 6758 and 8374/9180 are quite different in size. Id even be interested in who made your manifold, would save me the trouble of making one. Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
×
×
  • Create New...