Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is all good news guys, I'm happy to hear that I at least have my head around the requirements.

Yes I know I'll need a clutch, and shocks and likely brakes as well, nothing my R33 GT-R didn't have so I'm confident in those areas I just wanted feedback on the engine side of things as mine was only a mild tune 250awkw's.

I've read of people having N1 cores put inside of there R34 GT-R turbo's and having the housing machined. Is this worth the hassle for the cost savings?

^^ no, not when -7's from Garrett are $1200-$1300ea these days.

By the time you sell the R34 stockers, works out to around what, $1000ea which is cheaper, faster and easier.

Turbos off, turbos on...

Rather than turbos off... turbo shop takes "X" time ... turbos on.

Ahh right-o

I've heard some good and bad things about PFC's, what other real alternatives are there? Is Ben at Race Pace just a master who can tune a graphics calculator or does he recommend something?

Ahh didn't realise AFM was required.

Where's SydneyKid lurking, thought he would've chimed in by now...

what pwr do the std AFM and Injectors max out?

both the injectors and the afms reach their 'safe' limit at about 270-280rwkw. you can push more if you want but it's not advisable. considering to get past 270rwkw anyway you will be spending up on turbos etc you really should spend the money to get the fuel system to match and the AFMs to allow you to tune it properly.

I am running standard AFM's and injectors so you can get away with it. If you have the cash for Nismo AFMs then they are a good idea, especially if your stockies are getting old. I did put a nismo fuel pump in however which is also for a bit of security.

Just make sure you got a spare $16 odd grand firstly to buy all the bits, and then get Racepace to put it all on and tune it - or if your going to do it yourself you might save around $3k.

I just drove it out loaded up with goodies the day I left for targa tas and said "fix it" - knew there was no way I could come back to a slow stocky GTR after fanging one around tassie for a week - and there was no way I was going to put myself through changing the turbos on another rb26 for at least a year.

You can also use 300zx Z32 afm's - but I can't see the point - go brand new with the Nismos - they slot straight in place of your stockies - just read further.

I do think the Z32's are larger diameter so only useful for much higher power levels.

Edit: you also need to change plugs on your wiring loom (=yuk), and not sure if they will fit with your stock piping - looses the beauty of having a car for which there are so many true bolt on upgrades.

Edited by paulR32gtr
I think I remember seeing that some people had used two RB25 AFM's, yes no?

If Nismo items are the way to go what's the going rate on a set of those babies?

$350ea from perfect run.

Z32's aren't bolt in, Nismos are a Z32 sensor in a stock AFM casing :bunny:

Same deal wirth RB25 ones, dont 'bolt in'.

Nismo is the easiest soloution, not the cheapest however... but id rather buy new AFM's than use unknown others as AFM problems are painful (had some myself recently)

^^ that with the d-jetro is going to cost a lot more + the units extra cost itself.

So its pretty much even steven, one is not neccesarily better than the other.

Both can achieve the same end result, for the same cost.

Which is faster? The AFM path

nsta: How long have you had your stock bottom end at that power? Tell me a bit more about your car/driving habits etc

Everyone: What boost will GT-SS's need for the power in mind. Could the same power be achieved at lower boost on different turbos? Less boost means less heat and stress on the bottom end.

Ahh right-o

I've heard some good and bad things about PFC's, what other real alternatives are there? Is Ben at Race Pace just a master who can tune a graphics calculator or does he recommend something?

Ben could tune a medieval harp if it needed it!

nsta: How long have you had your stock bottom end at that power? Tell me a bit more about your car/driving habits etc

Everyone: What boost will GT-SS's need for the power in mind. Could the same power be achieved at lower boost on different turbos? Less boost means less heat and stress on the bottom end.

Yeah you could do it with bigger turbos, but then you'd have a less responsive car for the power.

Its a balance :bunny:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...