Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No, it comes down to pump fuel being horribly inconsistent and me not wanting to risk blowing up an engine because of one bad batch of fuel.

It's pretty simple to understand.

Horribly inconsistent.. If anything E85 should be quite consistent considering how it is contained at the servo unlike regular ULP and PULP.

There are others running around with 500rwkw (rb30's) without problems and not popping motors. Or is that an rb25 thing? :banana:

Horribly inconsistent.. If anything E85 should be quite consistent considering how it is contained at the servo unlike regular ULP and PULP.

There are others running around with 500rwkw (rb30's) without problems and not popping motors. Or is that an rb25 thing? :D

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

True.. However I think you worry too much given your fairly mild setup. :D

Unless that is you are throwing a GT42 or T51r and aiming for big numbers.

The GT35r 1.06. E85 or race fuel with good cams (265-272dur 10.5mm lift) your looking at ~420rwkw (behind a manual) on 20-22psi or so.

Your biggest problem are the cams when trying to make good power 350rwkw+ on reasonable boost levels.

Regardless you should be able to max out the turbo and able to 'easily' crack MTBT due to the GT35's large hot side on both E85 and race fuel. The tune WONT be ragged edge unless you try that on PUMP.

Any 'slight variation' in RON will not matter as you will be far away from the det threshold.

PULP is a completely different ball game as you won't get anywhere near MTBT so any slight variance in quality will have it knocking.

---

My ONLY concern with E85 is the blend variation between summer and winter.

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

Why would you tune any engine on the ragged edge unless your a fool with lots of money.

True.. However I think you worry too much given your fairly mild setup. :/

Unless that is you are throwing a GT42 or T51r and aiming for big numbers.

Nothing wrong with aiming for big (mph) numbers with a 25 and GT35/1.06 combo. The engine combo was spec'd as an example of what can be achieved with a very, very common setup that people can relate to. Not a GT47-equipped dyno queen.

The GT35r 1.06. E85 or race fuel with good cams (265-272dur 10.5mm lift) your looking at ~420rwkw (behind a manual) on 20-22psi or so.

Your biggest problem are the cams when trying to make good power 350rwkw+ on reasonable boost levels.

Power figures only concern me to the extent that they're reflected by terminal speeds. My 5-speed stocker made 265kW on the bottle and ran 120mph @ 3240lbs race weight. Why could so many other similar cars only manage 114-116mph with 300kW? The point here is that I'd be happy for the dyno to show 150kW if it ran 140mph! :laugh:

Regardless you should be able to max out the turbo and able to 'easily' crack MTBT due to the GT35's large hot side on both E85 and race fuel. The tune WONT be ragged edge unless you try that on PUMP.

Any 'slight variation' in RON will not matter as you will be far away from the det threshold.

PULP is a completely different ball game as you won't get anywhere near MTBT so any slight variance in quality will have it knocking.

I'm not concerned with breaking records on PULP. If I was, I wouldn't have stopped tuning at 19psi and 11.xx:1 AFR's.

---

My ONLY concern with E85 is the blend variation between summer and winter.

I've highlighted the word that best describes my argument.

Regardless.

I'm not talking of comparing dyno figures/ET's or breaking records on pulp. :/

Simply pointing out where you may wish to improve if you want to squeeze every little bit out of that turbo.

Those cams are the down fall of the setup its as simple as that.

GT35r is a push over for E85. There is head room for a little variation due to MTBT (minimum timing best torque). I.e push more ignition in you make less power.

The summer/winter variation isn't too much of a hassle and will no doubt be sorted soon as summer approaches. Well at least on the dyno I run on as various track only cars have been setup for use with E85. I'll be sure to share the findings if the variation is an issue.

Regardless.

I'm not talking of comparing dyno figures/ET's or breaking records on pulp. :/

Simply pointing out where you may wish to improve if you want to squeeze every little bit out of that turbo.

Those cams are the down fall of the setup its as simple as that.

GT35r is a push over for E85. There is head room for a little variation due to MTBT (minimum timing best torque). I.e push more ignition in you make less power.

The summer/winter variation isn't too much of a hassle and will no doubt be sorted soon as summer approaches. Well at least on the dyno I run on as various track only cars have been setup for use with E85. I'll be sure to share the findings if the variation is an issue.

What cams are you referring to? The Poncams in my thing? The dyno seems to show that it's flowing well enough in all the right places. We'll see. The biggest problem I can see is that in my area, there's only one E85 servo and it's not what you might call busy or reputable. lol.

Interested in the fuel variation you see on the dyno.

Thanks for that.

The ragged edge is suicidal....! especialy with normal fuel's

With E85 it loses power before it detonates, so if your running on the edge with e85 you have a tune that is soooo far off from making max torque and power its not funny.

Say i would make max power at 25deg, i could turn it up to 35 and just lose power and torque with no detonation with e85 (this has not been tested but I am guessing for an example) :/

What cams are you referring to? The Poncams in my thing? The dyno seems to show that it's flowing well enough in all the right places. We'll see. The biggest problem I can see is that in my area, there's only one E85 servo and it's not what you might call busy or reputable. lol.

Interested in the fuel variation you see on the dyno.

Yeah the poncams. 256 8.5mm lift.

Obviously you want every little kw out of the setup possible (your ragged tune comment) so bigger lift cams are a way of doing this while improving 'reliability' and reducing the RON requirement of your fuel.

You may then feel happier within yourself running E85 and saving hundreds of $$ per tank as its not so 'highly strung'.

All though E85 is perfectly fine due to the huge amount of head room (MTBT) it provides.

My 5-speed stocker made 265kW on the bottle and ran 120mph @ 3240lbs race weight. Why could so many other similar cars only manage 114-116mph with 300kW? The point here is that I'd be happy for the dyno to show 150kW if it ran 140mph! :)

From what I've seen, 120mph with 260-270rwkw is right on the money. My numbers below were achieved at that power level.

From what I've seen, 120mph with 260-270rwkw is right on the money. My numbers below were achieved at that power level.

Not disputing that for a second. It's just people get so caught up with dyno figures it blows me away.

Found this link while doing some more research. Okay, I'll admit it, you guys planted enough of a seed to start my brain racing. Bastards!!

Aussie Ethanol

They list the Barrack Heights Ethanol service station as selling the stuff too. And the best bit? It's 2 mins drive from my house.

You bastards!

That is all.

You bastards.

Waiting for the final word from my tuner but yes, it's looking that way. I think the thing that sealed the deal was the servo so close to me and the fact that I'll give it a go, decide if it's worth the farting around and then go from there.

Adelaide had a shortage of E85 for a few weeks and i had to use varied blends of premium mixed with E85 and i was suprised how little E85 was needed to prevent knocking!! so i wouldnt stress too much if it's not 100% consistant, only downside i could see was a higher consumption!

Edited by 180or200

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
    • As long as its NOT a HyperSHITtune, youll be fine.
    • First time visitor and currently getting ready to start work on my HK Premier.  Its all stock, 186 with 3 on the tree.  The only mod i have right now is extractors.  I am hoping to get some guidance on slightly modifying the engine to bring a little more power. Just going for a nice, comfortable cruiser.  The car is very straight, however i have been out of the country for 20 years and its been gathering dust at a family farm.  Will be doing quite a bit of body work to cut out some small rust areas (frnt quarter panels and a few other small bits) and fix up the paint.  Will be redoing the interior (its currently black and the seats are in real need of recovering and respringing the driver side (its front bench seat).  The dash needs a little TLC, but no real damage.  As my heater has degraded I am considering fitting something after-market that will be both heater/AC (recommendations here are always welcome). Wanting something discrete that will allow me to use the same controls and not be obvious once inside the car.   For the engine, i have been told i could consider upgrading my cam (imagine i would need a new head as well) and putting a new carby (currently the original stromberg).  However not sure what is going to be the best route.  Would certainly welcome any comments/suggestions.  As  a final step I am looking at changing the wheels. Current hubcaps are in dire need of refurbishment or replacement (imagine its a bit like hens teeth).  Thinking of some clean/classic looking mags (7-inch should be more than enough - not going for a large change in look).  Welcome any comments/advice and of course any questions. 
×
×
  • Create New...