Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

One thing ive noticed is condensation in my oil catch can and lines. I assume this only happens during warm up and dries out as the engine get hotter.

So far i have about 2 inches of water in my catch can, with about 5mm of oil sitting on top. Its a pretty good indicator to see how much the engine breathes (not much :( )

Ill be pulling the can out in the next service to have a look see.

Also a friend of mine has just turned key on a big RB 2530 engine (on E85) The exhaust is all new too and we can see very light surface rust inside the tip. No carbon though :devil:

has anyone noticed there oil getting milky? mine is, i've done comp tests, leak down tests, radiator pressure tests, checked with bore scope, not loosing any coolant, no oil in the coolant, no oil in the catch can. i'm starting think that fuel may have got into the oil and because e85 absorbs moisture and my car sits for months at a time (out in the weather during the day) and gets started and driven in and out of the workshop every day, that this could be causing my milky oil. any ideas?

my car sits for months at a time (out in the weather during the day) and gets started and driven in and out of the workshop every day, that this could be causing my milky oil. any ideas?

You will always get a little moisture in the oil when the car sits around and or is driven really short trips.

Short trips the oil doesn't get up to temp and evap the water off.

Last oil change my oil was a little milky also. The oil was in the engine for 6000kms :cool:

Ill be changing every 3000kms from now on.

Its a good idea (if able) to keep the car indoors, this will, i think lessen the chance of moisture being absorbed.

has anyone noticed there oil getting milky? mine is, i've done comp tests, leak down tests, radiator pressure tests, checked with bore scope, not loosing any coolant, no oil in the coolant, no oil in the catch can. i'm starting think that fuel may have got into the oil and because e85 absorbs moisture and my car sits for months at a time (out in the weather during the day) and gets started and driven in and out of the workshop every day, that this could be causing my milky oil. any ideas?

its the alcohol in the fuel making the oil go off.

methanol drag cars have the same issue...often changing the oil during a meet.

A friend of mine is a mechanic at a place in Sydney that does competition quad bikes of all things and they have some weird and wonderful engine set ups ie bored/stroked/ported/turbocharged/methanol burning .

Steve reckons that the zillion dollar Royal Purple oils are specifically made for alcohol burning engines . I'm not sure whats different in an oils make up to cope with alcohol but it is different .

I don't know which RP oil it is but for ULP burning engines they use Mobil 1 Racing 4T 15W50 bike oil .

Cheers A .

BTW Steve is not a person who likes E85 because he thinks high ethanol content fuel has too many water absorption problems and they literally flow on to become fuel system problems . In his opinion much more than 20-25% ethanol creates more problems than its worth being bothered with in a daily driven street car .

I would really like to see some kind of water separation system developed that fitted in line somewhere in the cars fuel system .

A .

was it all the water in the catch can that caused the spillage on saturday dave?

Yeh that and too much rev limiter :D

I need to redesign my catch can setup, the Greddy can is useless.

we don't have e85 on the pump over here. the best we have is mobil with like 5% ethenol.

we have done some dyno testing over here in nz on our dynapack hub dyno.

we had a standard internaled s13 sr20det, with a hks gt-rs turbo, link g4 ecu with boost control and airtemp, steam pipe manifold, small front mount, rx7 2ndary 800cc injectors.

on 98 pump gas it made 220kw on 20psi at the rear hubs.

on our custom e30 blend. (3ltrs pure ethenol to every 7ltrs of 95 pump gas) it made 260kw on standard cams and intake manifold on 20psi with no knock as what guilt toy found. it took an extra 7degs timing on 20psi over the whole rev range, reduced over heating issues when drifting also. managed to hold power and torque up untill redline, rather then the usual sr20 power and torque fall off.

we have also tested e20 and had very similar results.

with my car im going to tune it for 98pump gas on 19-20psi. as my ecu has the ability to have switchable fuel and boost maps i will then have a swtichable fuel map for a e20 or e30mix. although my injectors (v5 sti 440cc) won't be big enough so i will either decap them to 800s or decap some standard 370cc ones to get 650cc

before i can get that far i need a new clutch as mine will start slipping im guessing when i up the boost and then change the fuel, could be looking at a 60kw gain over my 16psi 277kw.

we are also building a sr20de+t with standard compression ration of 10.4:1 running 20psi and ethenol fuel, specs of the engine are a bit shady at the mo, weather its got forgded DE pistons or run standard bottom end is undecided. i won't have a result for a few months im guessing as the engine has just been stripped ready for the rebuild.

oh... so i shouldn't really be running E85 full time on my 34? it's my daily, but only say 3 times a week.

and i take it i need to change oil more regularly as well then?

as long as it gets driven fairly regularly and for more than ten minutes you should be ok. the oil gets a chance to warm up and evaporate all the water out of it. if you keep an eye on the oil it should be able to do 5000km, but if you start to see milky oil you might want to change it sooner.

BADR33 that's very interesting about the home brewed E20-E30 mixes . I'd be interested to know where the sweet spot is with ethanol ULP blends because I think with less than extreme apps ratios of less than 85% ethanol could change the playing field - as in just enough ethanol to get the job done and no more .

I'm also very interested in your idea of switching mapping with your Link (G4 Storm ?) because that's what I'd like to do with my ancient Subaru RX Turbo L Series . I'm looking at Storm's and V44's ATM , I'd like to be able to switch between 95ULP and some form of ethanol blend and I'm looking at 370cc FJ20ET injectors or modified to hose tail (barbed) RX7 injectors ie 440's or 550's .

My R33 can sit for a week or two at a time and I wouldn't like E85 lying around for that long .

Lets know how you go , cheers Adrian .

BADR33 that's very interesting about the home brewed E20-E30 mixes . I'd be interested to know where the sweet spot is with ethanol ULP blends because I think with less than extreme apps ratios of less than 85% ethanol could change the playing field - as in just enough ethanol to get the job done and no more .

I'm also very interested in your idea of switching mapping with your Link (G4 Storm ?) because that's what I'd like to do with my ancient Subaru RX Turbo L Series . I'm looking at Storm's and V44's ATM , I'd like to be able to switch between 95ULP and some form of ethanol blend and I'm looking at 370cc FJ20ET injectors or modified to hose tail (barbed) RX7 injectors ie 440's or 550's .

My R33 can sit for a week or two at a time and I wouldn't like E85 lying around for that long .

Lets know how you go , cheers Adrian .

the lower % mix means the car runs a little nicer when its first cold, as you may find with your e85 the car is a little harder to start on very cold mornings.

20% removed all knock from the first sr20det we tund on it.

we have a supplier in nz who we buy pure ethenol fuel off, then we just measure it and pour it in. we can buy premix, but you get better value for money out of pure ethenol.

i have a gtslink g4 ecu (same as a g4 storm but a plug in for twin cam skylines and has 6x injector drives)

the g4 link has an amazing amount of features, you can run switchable fuel maps and also switchable boost maps.

if you run with the boost control with the link g4, its amazing how awesome the boost control is. you control the soliniod like an injector as such. you can make it so no pressure gets to the wastegate actuator to bring boost on faster. and you can free boost the turbo to hold the boost up top if you need too.

there is also allowance for air temp sensor ajustments so you run the same boost all the time no matter what the outside air temp is. and tps ajustment so you can make full boost on 20% throttle if you wanted.

there so much more advanced then power fc, no afm, and just a huge range of features, more then what most people will ever need.

over here there considerd to be very simlar to a motec etc, just $1200+ cheeper

i would suggest you try find some 550s or similar just to allow for the extra fuel required by ethenol to get the same af ratio as 95, the link will idle your car fine with that.

we get sr20det idling normal with modifyed 370cc to 650cc with a link g4, power fc is a little harder from what i have heard.

the main part of getting the full result is your tuner in the end, the more familar they are with the software the better they will understand and the faster they will finish the job.

over here its $800-$1000 for a full pump gas dyno tune with switchable boost maps.

i will try get some dyno sheets from the sr20det we did the 30% tuning on with before and after.

i don't remeber if i said this before. the supplier of our ethenol has done a fair amount of research on it, and e30(30% ethenol 70% shell 95) has approx 105 octaine.

Yes 20% sounds a bit more manageable than 85% and it wouldn't be that hard to blend using suitable amounts of E85 here to get an 80/20 split .

It would also mean injector size would not need to be as big as an E85 burner would need .

I gather you "turn" side feeds from 370 to 650 by removing the 4 hole wafer to expose the single pintle valve .

A feller here from the classic SAu side is setting up to race a DR30 and is prepared to swap me some RX7 turbo injectors , I think 460 high impedance and 550 low impedance 11mm O ring injectors , for my old DR front struts brakes etc .

The 460's would be a bonus because they are high impedance which is what suits the Vipec V44 and Link G4 Storm . I'm told you have to buy and wire in the separate peak and hold injector box to run that type of injector .

Anyway I doubt this engine would like much over 200 Hp on a daily basis and 460's could probably do that even with E85 .

I just need to have a few shallow barbs machined into the top sections of these O ring injectors to reliably clamp a high pressure EFI rated hose to .

Actually just on ULP I've been doing a bit of digging on the burning characteristics of the various octane types and I think it's a little known fact that the lower octane ULP is better than the higher octane stuff at everything except suppressing detonation . It could actually be possible to get a better brew blending ethanol with more mundane 91 or 95 ULP so long as you get enough octane to stop the detonation .

It was explained to me that the additives used to make say 98 ULP detonation resistant makes it harder to spark ignite than say 91 ULP and it tends to make it burn slower as well . The person said the low octane stuff burns at a faster rate and slightly higher temperature so from a cylinder pressure perspective alls good - until it detonates .

It would be REAL interesting to see how much extra ethanol it would take to stop 91 ULP from detonating under high loads or whatever .

The price alone of 91 ULP with lets say 25 or 30% ethanol content could be quite friendly . I'm only guessing that 5-10% extra ethanol over the 98 ULP/E20 would give the same detonation resistance but there would be an overall octane equivalency point somewhere .

For the fist time in a lot of years I put what I though was poverty pac fuel (91 ULP) in my daily just to see what would happen , it hasn't pinged yet so while its in a quite soft state of tune and the engine fresh higher octane fuel won't make it run better and maybe slightly worse than it could . Such is life .

Lets know what you think and how things go , cheers Adrian .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...