Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If I install an RB25DE with carbs in an early Skyline with an upgraded ignition system can I completley eliminate the ECU and wiring harness? Because it seems like the only things the ECU really needs to control is timing (which will now be handled by the ignition system) and air/fuel ratio (now controlled by the carbs).

Thanks! :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246188-rb25de-with-carbs/
Share on other sites

yes its a possibility

here in australia there was an early model Nissan Patrol ('88-90 i think) that came out with the RB30 but in carby form

if you could get hold of an intake manifold it could be possible to install a big holley 350 double pumper or something on it

thats crazy, interesting to hear what that would sound like..

... shit...

lol

feed it triple trumpeted webbers or even SU's and it would be allright though

Wouldnt be hard to custom make a manifold, would be better to start fresh, and make a short runner manifold feeding diectly to carbies instead of modifying the dirty 30 manifold to suit a 25

Edited by SKiT_R31

The question would be, WHY?

Even if transplanting, the engine is still from a "new" vehicle, and hence, when being engineered, needs to meet the Emmision levels of the engine.

Hence, going Carby, you will not meet these emissions, so I'd really have to ask WHY you want to do it?

If you get a whole loom, plus ECU, it really is only around 5 or so wires you need to modify to make it all fit. Much easier the customising manifolds.

Completely remove ECU and wiring harness...

but replace with custom inlet manifold and multiple carbies, you'd also need to use a different fuel pump as the EFI pump will have too much pressure for the carbies?

Potentially, yes it could be done, but question remains why you'd want to when you could get better tunability, resulting in more power and probably less fuel consumption, not to mention safe guards of things like knock sensors.

If you want induction noise, throttle response and better breathe-ability, you could make a custom inlet with individual throttles but still retain fuel injection.

induction noise, throttle response and better breathe-ability having 6 throttle bodies and no plenum if you were to use 3 side draught webbers, dellotos or so on.

Make a custom throttle with ITB, with individual air filters.

Same throttle response, same induction noise, no plenum, better tuneability, more reliable and consistent through varying weather patterns.

I still need to ask why you want to remove the ECU, considering, placing it in any car in NSW would make it illegal with ECU etc removed.

last time i checked, running an aftermarket ecu was also illegal.....

I would much prefer ITB's + MAP, but i can see why you would want carbies... and the induction/exhaust noise would be different, and you cant say for sure that you would get more power out of EFI, maybe economy and drivability and flexibility (weather, atmosphere etc) but it can be cheaper and a whole lot easier with carbies. Esp if you were to have some rediculous cam setup, aswell as other modifications, where you would need a damn good tuner to get good power (and lets face it, its hard to get a tuner so passionate to sqeeze every last kw out of a car by spending hours dicking with injector timing etc.)

Edited by SKiT_R31
The question would be, WHY?

Even if transplanting, the engine is still from a "new" vehicle, and hence, when being engineered, needs to meet the Emmision levels of the engine.

Hence, going Carby, you will not meet these emissions, so I'd really have to ask WHY you want to do it?

If you get a whole loom, plus ECU, it really is only around 5 or so wires you need to modify to make it all fit. Much easier the customising manifolds.

I still need to ask why you want to remove the ECU, considering, placing it in any car in NSW would make it illegal with ECU etc removed.

It says he's from Japan so our laws won't mean anything to him LOL

Edited by MintR33

when i run modifird production in speedway the rules said we had to use a 350 holley altho it could be converted to run methanol.

a few of the guys running vl's at the time used the nissan patrol manifold with a methanol holley and made good power out of them .

problem was finding the manifolds it was a problem back then and prob even worse now

cheers mid life crisis

If I install an RB25DE with carbs in an early Skyline with an upgraded ignition system can I completley eliminate the ECU and wiring harness? Because it seems like the only things the ECU really needs to control is timing (which will now be handled by the ignition system) and air/fuel ratio (now controlled by the carbs).

Thanks! :D

What's going to tell the "modified ignition system" to fire the spark?

The ECU does more than simply "control ignition timing".

If you are after the carby induction sound, you can run injectors in a weber-style manifold fitted with trumpets (have a look on www.efihardware.com). That way, you get the fuel efficiency of EFI with the induction "roar" of Webers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...