Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

REPORT:-

A black Lexus driver was carjacked last night.

At Chester Hill, he was bumped from behind by the perp driving a blue MY90s Subaru WRX with No. Plate XVY169.

When he pulled over, the perps in the WRX came out with a handgun.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248346-carjacking-at-chester-hill/
Share on other sites

This happens with top end cars all the time...

Esp audis, they just wait for you in your carpark or garage then demand the keys...

what do you think they had been using for the ATM blowups? a brand spanker RS4, carjacked from a guy that just parked it in his "Secure" garage in rushcutters bay... It got in alot of chases and the cops called it off because they couldnt keep up... Pitty the idiots blew the airbags on it when they bombed an atm lol smart guys!

lol

so was the Lexus black, or the driver?

Dunno! Who can tell at night-time anyways??? lol

And NYTSKY, as a noob, I find the show 'Law & Order' very educational! - perps indeed

Poor Lexus, if it does end up involved with ATM explosions it might 'Die Hard'

You see, I learn a lot about Collateral Damage, Dying Hard, Executive Decisions, Changing Lanes from the idiot box eh?

Tez

REPORT:-

A black Lexus driver was carjacked last night.

At Chester Hill, he was bumped from behind by the perp driving a blue MY90s Subaru WRX with No. Plate XVY169.

When he pulled over, the perps in the WRX came out with a handgun.

It is a worry seems every month there is a car jacking similar to this.

I lived in new york for years most recently last year and there were FAR less car jackings.

Ok lots of random shootings in bad areas over drugs, yes, but nobody was going to take your car

grand theft auto style! and that in a city of over 10 million people.

of course in 1992 in new york, things were very different:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...752C1A964958260

Trust me to be Dyslectic about the Number Plate VXW169!

Failed Kindergarten because I'd get tired near the end of the alphabet.

The REPORT says that the Lexus went off in "an unknown direction" Sam.

I guess if I was shitting myself after looking down a gun barrel, I'd be thinking, "Which way did it go?"

Tez

It is a worry seems every month there is a car jacking similar to this.

I lived in new york for years most recently last year and there were FAR less car jackings.

Ok lots of random shootings in bad areas over drugs, yes, but nobody was going to take your car

grand theft auto style! and that in a city of over 10 million people.

of course in 1992 in new york, things were very different:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...752C1A964958260

That was about the time when Rudi Julianni took over as the Mayor of NY, and Police Commisioner Kelly must have been under him.

"Zero Tolerance" became the order of the decade.

But even if Sydney is next-to-nothing compared Johannesburg in car-jackings, it's still a worrying thought to drive a 'target car'.

It certainly is a natural reaction for a driver to pull over after a 'bump' to exchange details. And at night, it's hardly likely you can make out who might be in the car behind you.

This is the same M.O. that got Dr Victor Chang killed!!!

Tez

It is a worry seems every month there is a car jacking similar to this.

I lived in new york for years most recently last year and there were FAR less car jackings.

Ok lots of random shootings in bad areas over drugs, yes, but nobody was going to take your car

grand theft auto style! and that in a city of over 10 million people.

of course in 1992 in new york, things were very different:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...752C1A964958260

sydney is starting to suck ass now days

thats because the punishment is too leanient....

see, if they Legalised hand-guns like USA ..this matter of black lexus wouldnt of happened.......................

because obviously, having one you wouldved gunned the f#$%-mofo down & worry about the court case later.

Edited by eeiko321
REPORT:-

A black Lexus driver was carjacked last night.

At Chester Hill, he was bumped from behind by the perp driving a blue MY90s Subaru WRX with No. Plate XVY169.

When he pulled over, the perps in the WRX came out with a handgun.

Dunno! Who can tell at night-time anyways??? lol

And NYTSKY, as a noob, I find the show 'Law & Order' very educational! - perps indeed

Poor Lexus, if it does end up involved with ATM explosions it might 'Die Hard'

You see, I learn a lot about Collateral Damage, Dying Hard, Executive Decisions, Changing Lanes from the idiot box eh?

Tez

well thats the scary thing Tezza......

especially your car...your R34 GT-R wouldve been a prized catch of the decade for them!

and theres nothing else to do you see but to drive off or get out to exchange details.....but you dont know who is who in the car.....what if someone legitimently bumped you?

well what will you do if someone bumped your car at night after work, and your car being a relitively expensive car to own and repair?

i was thinking about this incident.....pondering......."hmmmm a convertible lexus?...i dont know any?"

now come to think of it.........

shieeeet........thats the lexus SC430

im not sure all of them but i recall seeing a price tag on one of the models for $162000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

f##$ing low life, waste of precious air........human trash

The bump from behind has been happening for a while. Carjackers were using it to defeat factory auto-locks, as cars with them generally have the doors unlock in an "accident" to make it easier to rescue the occupants.

this is totally messed up and I reckon it's about time our court/justice systems had an overhaul. Too many times scumbags like this get away with a slap on the wrist, even if it's GTA with an illegal firearm.

We need to start mass imprisoning idiots, imposing huge fines and deporting or Sydney WILL become a complete cesspool

this very thing happend to the editor of hpi or zoom or auto salon

full write up and all he had key pad entry on the gtr he had

few "middle eastern" his words in a blue wrx bumped him from behind he armed the imobiliser

they chased him for a while on foot he just left the car there and threw the keys in a bush as the car is useless with out the key pad code

ran to a near by house and bashed on the door until someone answerd and called the police

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...