Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i just brought my first r32 gts-t i was wondering which turbo would be my best choice. it already has a gt35r on it an its a laggy as f*k it starts to make boost around 4300 an full boost around 4600.car has wolf3d, larger unkown injectors sard fuel reg.custom turbo manifold with external gate etc etc.After around 200-230kw.what would be an ideal turbo that makes boost around 3000? any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249380-gt35r-downsizing/
Share on other sites

Have you driven a car with that much? That turbo is rated for 300+ kws or so... that's a big drop down!

I have a VG30 turbo lieing around (slightly better then an RB25 turbo)... you could highflow it for around 220 - 230kws...

NYTSKY mate i was thinking along the lines of a gt30 when do they start to make boost?a lot of people on here seem to be using hks GT 2530. Mlr mate with the cam gears what sort of rpm do u think this would lower the boost range by? thanks

Not sure mate, I'm looking into this as I'm having the same thing going on with mine, rb25 with gt35, tuner recons it will drop between 250 to 500 rpm.

Not doing this though till next year when its going in for a rebuild so no answer on this for a while from me, sorry.

I'm sure someone on here could give you a definitive answer.

Not sure mate, I'm looking into this as I'm having the same thing going on with mine, rb25 with gt35, tuner recons it will drop between 250 to 500 rpm.

Not doing this though till next year when its going in for a rebuild so no answer on this for a while from me, sorry.

I'm sure someone on here could give you a definitive answer.

Yeah i will do some searches on that an thanks man.

Unbiased opinion.

GT3076R would be good choice

But if it was me I could not go past the Billet S56-GT3 with .63 A/R hot side.

The S56-GT3 specs are pretty dam good

The S56 compressor wheel has a 56mm inducer and 80mm Major + (ETT).

Turbine has an exducer of 56.6mm and a major of 65mm and is made of 713C Inconel

Compressor map

S56ETT.jpg

Turbine.

GT31.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...