Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The only boost control device you need is your right foot :P

THIS.

I can't understand why people have those two stage boost controllers. i.e. 12psi low boost, 20psi high boost.

Pointless, if you want less boost, lift your foot a little??

My factory boost controller has been modified to give up to 13-14 psi, I have a switch turning it on and off. Boost gauge doesn't like regular changes though.

Clutch slippage, low boost till fixed. (done)

Coilpacks going, low boost till fixed. (done)

L plater girlfriend driving, low boost.

Car feels different, still nice to drive just a bit slower, I actually preferred it for a while.

Traction on nankangs is poor, esp in the wet, low boost helps as the stock turbo is insanely responsive and quickly goes from 7-14psi, wheelspin. Also with stock turbo there really isn't much difference between 7 and 14psi in terms of right foot position, just in power. The boost curve is weird because I don't have an electronic boost controller. 7 psi by 3000rpm, 14psi by 3100rpm.

Not sure why you'd do it with an actual boost controller. I did it to help the turbo, and the above reasons.

It's not going slower I was after, it was less boost, less engine stress. I preferred the switch.

Edited by Galois
It will have grip Steve. the tyres on it atm are just some nankangs that we use for the dyno

Track spec is going to be something entirely different.

I have to give credit to Marty White for the job he did on the head. It looks like bugger all but as he said, watch it spool. And boy! does it spool.

I had nankangs on mine for the tune and they turned to smoke and sprayed rubber up the wall and onto the roof of the car. lol

It looks like I'll get to the 5's just as you're getting to the 4's. Have you decided on turbo?

If you get into the 5s it will be on a boost level you wouldnt use everyday.

As for the turbo, it has become a very hard decision now. There are sooo many i want to try. There is one combo i would like but it means a total re-engineering of the exhaust side of the engine and im chomping at the bit as it is to get the thing on the road.

If you get into the 5s it will be on a boost level you wouldnt use everyday.

As for the turbo, it has become a very hard decision now. There are sooo many i want to try. There is one combo i would like but it means a total re-engineering of the exhaust side of the engine and im chomping at the bit as it is to get the thing on the road.

Lol, I'm not one of those high boost low boost switching people. Set it once then leave it, I figure it's not like the car runs at the highest boost all the time, only full throttle and that's up to my right foot to control :D

The 5557 sounds like it could be the winner for you from what powertune have done so far. I know what you mean about trying heaps of setups-that's all I talk about with Tonys brother every weekend......now where did I leave that money tree....

Steve, the 5557 i think is GT3076 territory.

One of the options was a Precision turbo though.

Believe it or not i am already planning the next engine turbo combo and the current one is not even finished yet :D

I'm hoping to have a stock rb25det/5557 plain bearing result veeery soon.

400 would be nice.... ha ha ha at the fly.

400......hp :D

Steve, the 5557 i think is GT3076 territory.

One of the options was a Precision turbo though.

Believe it or not i am already planning the next engine turbo combo and the current one is not even finished yet :D

Likewise, as you know.

I've got the bug bigtime to drive it again

nice result noel you crusty old man. although it really is way too much power just to drive to bingo on sundays but I guess you can get there early for prime seating. :D

hehe. seriously though that's a kick ass looking set-up mate. hope it gives solid service for years to come. :P

THIS.

I can't understand why people have those two stage boost controllers. i.e. 12psi low boost, 20psi high boost.

Pointless, if you want less boost, lift your foot a little??

only reason i like having diffrent boost setings is so when i go to the track i can put my car on 16psi instead of thrashing it on 19psi all day long.

It didnt :D turbo number 4 shat its self on saturday

Yeah we are removing it now to send it off to Garrett to find out why. The last 3 turbos all failed for legitimate reasons. I'm expecting this one to be the same. It's a damn shame but we'll see what they say. Considering he's got sonic stickers all over the car I hope they give him a free one. If not then I'm sure he'll move to turbonetics or something journal based. He certainly doesn't need to worry about response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...