Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ye but it only ran 135mph - SIF 900rwkw

yep, absolutely no way. Even if it had a lazy take off (which it did) and has low 'average' power, it should still have pulled off 145

I found that comical considering my ET was 129.75mph with only 320awkw

My mates xr6 ran a 10.9 with 400rwkw

130mph just tells me the dyno figure you are quoting is low. At 130mph you should have 500-520rwhp (370-390rwkw)

130mph just tells me the dyno figure you are quoting is low. At 130mph you should have 500-520rwhp (370-390rwkw)

That was in my r32gtr with street radials, 320awkw was on a dyno dynamics dyno as well (crd tune).

I think I'm a good driver :) 60 foot was 1.5s from memory...

That was in my r32gtr with street radials, 320awkw was on a dyno dynamics dyno as well (crd tune).

I think I'm a good driver :) 60 foot was 1.5s from memory...

It doesn't matter if you take 20 seconds to get off the line, your top end speed will be similar

they dont do mph tho like gtr's. have a look at any ford v8 with a s/c, even with huge power they just dont run the mph for some reason. the turb is always faster with the same power.

that doesn't make any sense.

Edited by Rolls

yep, absolutely no way. Even if it had a lazy take off (which it did) and has low 'average' power, it should still have pulled off 145

130mph just tells me the dyno figure you are quoting is low. At 130mph you should have 500-520rwhp (370-390rwkw)

so does that mean the dyno is out by like 700hp ?

60 foot generally has no effect on trap speed.

I ran the same mph on street tyres as i did on slicks.

I found that it did, minor - but it was consistent as i raced every 2nd week for 6 months :D

This is what i was doing when on the same tyres with varying 60fts.

1.9 60ft - 109mph (12.9 ET)

2.1 60ft - 110-111mph (13.2 ET)

But yes, marko - you didnt have 320rwkw with a 11.1 @ 130mph, over 350.

I found that it did, minor - but it was consistent as i raced every 2nd week for 6 months :D

This is what i was doing when on the same tyres with varying 60fts.

1.9 60ft - 109mph (12.9 ET)

2.1 60ft - 110-111mph (13.2 ET)

But yes, marko - you didnt have 320rwkw with a 11.1 @ 130mph, over 350.

That is interesting ash as crd's dyno isn't optimistic so u might be right...I know that my tuner did tell me to convert from awkw to rwkw I'd need to add close to 10%, therefore 320awkw might equate to 350rwkw

i know but that is how it happens. do some reasearch and u will see what i mean.

It has nothing to do with the fact it is turbo or v8, the reason they have different speeds is turbo cars (skylines etc) have much better drag coefficients than V8s from the 70s, they are also usually quite a bit lighter. It has absolutely nothing to do with the engine, power is power, it won't go faster just because it is a turbo :P

so does that mean the dyno is out by like 700hp ?

lol, I can get a camry to read 1200hp. Not saying it doesn't make a lot of power, just saying it doesn't make as much as they claim...unless ofcourse, he backed off at the end like someone said.

I don't think I'd post a 11sec run on youtube if I did one with that much hp

Also rolls there power curves are usually pretty different, Im not sure about the supercharged v8s, but when i was comparing the NA V8 torque/power curves to my rb30, i noticed that the v8s power curves usually have pretty flat torque curves that result in the peak power being made almost at their peak RPM, while my car had a lot less torque off boost, but once on boost picked up a lot of torque through the mid-range and started dropping off a fair way before redline, so although they made the same peak power, my car had more torque in the top end, as its power curve had a rounded top earlier in the rev range while the NA v8 had a straight line power curve. If the supercharged dyno curves are similar could explain it.. tho im stikking a v8 in a r32, so i suppose we'll see what sort of top end speed it will get with a car thats light and has a descent drag coefficient.

Anyone got a gt3788r dyno curve yet?? I've been following this thread waiting for someone to post one, so i can compare the response to my gt35r

Jarrod

I found that it did, minor - but it was consistent as i raced every 2nd week for 6 months :D

This is what i was doing when on the same tyres with varying 60fts.

1.9 60ft - 109mph (12.9 ET)

2.1 60ft - 110-111mph (13.2 ET)

But yes, marko - you didnt have 320rwkw with a 11.1 @ 130mph, over 350.

Yes, you are correct... People don't often understand the concept of why when your 60ft is lower the mph is lower. When you do a quicker 60ft you do a quicker ET, a quicker ET allows your car less time to accelerate and thus is going slower at the finish line.

Got a tip for you guys, an R32 skyline has a f**king atrocious drag coefficient like almost 0.4 or something.

I've heard that they've got a good one, and i've heard that they've got a horrible one. Hard facts please people, sick of the hearsay.

.40 it is, seems i was getting it confused with something else (and not the new gtr either)

Edited by sneakey pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...