Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have there been many results with the gtx3076r around the place?

I dont think on here.. I know the supra forums have some results, and also the S2K guys have some results too. A search in google gave me a lot of BS, if i have time later when i get home i'll post the links.

Have them in favourites on the lap top :) on the phone atm, sorry mate!

Marko - thanks for the reply. I'll go through and have another read, i remember reading that they are stock items in AMG's, etc? The flow rate is awesome.. Price isnt too much of a drama, would rather hold out a bit longer to get good equipment.

Feel free to post up how you go fitting it :)

That GT3582R compressor map isn't right... see from Garrett:

Damn, I knew it was too good to be true. How can the maps be different? I got that one off the ATP US website.

It does say 68mm not 82mm like the one you posted too.

Dajae - I bought a pierburg but haven't fitted it yet...I created a thread on my findings and what I can tell you is that it flows more than the aeromotive stealth by a decent margin but I can't recall the figures exactly.

As a comparison, Bosch 044 flows 200ltrs/min @ 5bar whereas the pierburg flows 360ltrs/min @ 5bar.

They are not cheap so expect to pay about $450 with a filter.

You wont regret it. I am running 2 of the suckers and together they are quieter than one walbro or bosch.

You wont regret it. I am running 2 of the suckers and together they are quieter than one walbro or bosch.

Great stuff, do you have them intank or external? How did you go about fitting them, not really a drop in? I had a quick search, but only found discussions on the use of them, not so much the fitting etc. My walbro is fairly quiet (although I dont really have much to compare it to), so if its even quieter, fantastic!

Veyron.. 4 of these pumps all together isn't it?

Ok, so some results for the GTX3076R .. Turns out it probably can flow enough for ~400rwkw :) but with all things, we should take this on board with some speculation. I mean like seriously, a Focus with over 400fwkw... With an intercooler the size of a cereal box? C'mon... Lol. Ok, enough jibber-jabber, linky time!

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=497486

^ Bit of a comparo with a GT3076R.

^ The focus with 600whp..

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2110277

^ Fairly good write up on some of the GTX range. You can see here why I'm pretty confident of the GTX3076R hitting ~400rwkw.

^ And finally, an RB25 making 534whp. I know, its not *quite* 400rwkw, but farout it's close! Awesome stuff.

I'm drooling at the thought of getting one now.. :D

There is no way that 240SX belongs to that dyno graph. Have a look at the way it ramps up compared to the power line.

There is also a very very very slim chance you would ever get a real 530rwhp from a GTX3076 and not on 26PSI.

On 20PSI the GT3076R is lucky to crack 300RWKW. 6psi more and a 10% more efficient compressor does no equal 130hp at the wheels. I'm betting methanol or nitrous help if the figure is right

On E85 I can fully see them hitting 400kw, as I've already said. On pump gas, I'm pretty confident of it NOT happening. You don't need >60lb/min of flow to make that kind of power when using flash fuels though.

a lot of dynos in the UK (if thats where the focus one is from) give readings based on some crap math for "flywheel" hp

Definately have to take this results with some sceptism, but the potential is there.

Lith, agreed with e85 400wkw would be achievable. Hopefully when r33_racer (sorry i dont know your name, im quite a n00b to the skyline community) gets the gtx on the 3.4, will see some similar results. Anyway, enough of me hijacking the thread.

Thanks for the input guys :)

There is no way that 240SX belongs to that dyno graph. Have a look at the way it ramps up compared to the power line.

There is also a very very very slim chance you would ever get a real 530rwhp from a GTX3076 and not on 26PSI.

On 20PSI the GT3076R is lucky to crack 300RWKW. 6psi more and a 10% more efficient compressor does no equal 130hp at the wheels. I'm betting methanol or nitrous help if the figure is right

Agree on the 240sx. To look at the car on the dyno it's hardly straining the dyno. To make that sort of power with a 4th gear run your going to be making upward of 8000N of tractive effort. When you are making 8000N you can tell that the car is wanting to leave the dyno - that car is barely moving on the dyno.

I don't believe it will be impossible to make 400rwkw with a gtx3076r but you will need high octane fuel min 105ron. And your may need to increase the cr to help the bsfc.

Edited by rob82

What makes you think it might not?

They take alot of meat out of the block to fit the 3.4 stroker. Have heard of a few blocks not holding up for long.

Have u tested one before?

Only what i have been told never seen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shouldn't need a "base map" for anything other than guidance to ignition tuning. You just need the engine capacity right, the injector size right, and something, almost anything, for a VE map. On an NA engine, fuelling is almost completely a function of load signal & rpm. It should run and drive with a completely flat fuel map. It will be too lean under load, but that's easily fixed. We used to tune all ECUs without any base map. There were no such things (until someone had tuned a near stock engine on one, and then they had a "base map".
    • What did you actually buy/how much did it cost? When I got mine in like.. 2017...? 2019? the aim was to run Torque for gauges via ODB2 and things like Track Addict/Laptimers/Dashcam/Reversecam/Spotify etc. Mine never broke, but I wonder if you've got the same needs (it sounds like it). Cause I liked the idea of being able to do anything with it. That said, yours also cost 3x the cost of what I spent so... food for thought.  
    • For me there is a massive difference in manufacturer or big brand crippled android (Sony, Kenwood etc) vs the sort of thing I've installed here, which is basically just a tablet in DIN form factor with open Android, and the other model of course is mirroring - Android Auto/Carplay. I hate the locked down manufacturer and AA options where they decide what apps I'm allowed to install, including the Launcher but also importantly things like Ecutek (for this car) or Real Dash (Stagea) are not supported. Plus those crippled versions tend to be slower due to both overheads and lower spec hardware. On the other hand, when this breaks I'll likely be in trouble for support....but how is that different to owning an Infiniti anyway
    • Yeah, Duncan is helping sell me back to Android devices. I've hated the whole Android head units due to their speed issues. Even in my old Hyundai Kona (2022 model), it behind the scenes was Android, and slow and shitty to start up. Once running wasn't bad, but still a good 15 to 30 seconds.
    • My roof rails are off atm on the E39 until the rust is fixed. I did find another little bit of surface rust under the rails when I took them off. As @soviet_merlin said I'd just leave them alone unless you're planning on ensuring they're properly sealed. I was on the fence about leaving them off as the delete is still a thing in BMW E39's but I feel like the car is missing something (er, it is, der) with them off and I'm looking forward to putting them back on.
×
×
  • Create New...