Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now I say test because I'm using an application on my iPhone to test this. I was expecting <14.3 but have been getting between 14.4 - 15.1 depending on launch.

The reason i expected a certain time is due to a friend of mine getting a 14.4 i believe, in a bunky piece of shit s13 CA18 running like a brick who to all of my knowledge drives terribly.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

also i think i could probably get faster because its listing my 60ft time on my best run of 14.42 as 2.57 sec, i understand that's quite high ?

my question is should i expect a faster 1/4 mile with these mods:

3" turbo back exhaust

3inch stainless intake with pod

FMIC

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

Ill post graph of run if anyone is interested, also its called dynolicious if any of you want to check it out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253470-r32-rb20-14-mile-tests/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

0-100 km/h = 6.43 sec

0-160 km/h = 13.87 sec

60' = 2.57 sec @ 45.2 km/h

1/8 mi = 9.51 sec @ 130 km/h

1000' = 12.18 sec @ 149.6 km/h

1/4 mi = 14.42 sec @ 166.3 km/h

max G's = 0.60 G's

peak power = 160rwkw

post-22805-1232467883_thumb.jpg

does this all seem consistent or should i worry it isnt accurate ?

if it is right, looking at my 60foot and final speed do i have much room to improve ?

if this thing is right, you can do in the high 13 sec. 2.57 60ft time sucks, you need to get in the 2.0-2.2 and you'll hit 13.

thats what i thought, was expecting a 0 - 100 closer to 6 than i been getting. Having trouble launching with traction. very inconsistent. dunno weather to dump it on launch at a lower rpm or ease off the throttle at a higher rpm

might also need some new tyres. ive had the same crappy no name ones on since i bought the car. keep putting off RE01's till i get new wheels >_>

Take it to a real strip. Where are you managing to run a 1/4mile on the street anyway? 166kmh is well over the speed limit :thumbsup:

P.S. with 183rwkw I ran a 13.9 @ 103mph, 2.3sec 60' (no traction in 1st).

Edited by bubba

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

The weight only comes into the power calculation, so the acceleration time should be reasonably accurate as long as the hardware and software are up to it.

If you run at the track use the iPhone as well to compare and post up results.

Yeah the weight shouldn't matter unless you are wanting to estimate power - the time etc SHOULD be fairly ok if the phone is mounted well and the road is good etc. We tried out my mates Dynolicious setup on his iPhone and the results seemed all screwed though I had a look through the settings and the rollout was "0" etc which can make your 60ft/ET etc look worse than if you ran it at the strip. Check the config and see if the rollout is set to something sensible, 166kph should have you in the 13s.

Things like GTimers come default with sensible rollout and "start timing" g-Force settings so are a bit more realistic from the outset.

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

Not ragging on your car but I believe it is far off being accurate.

My 34GTT pulls a 14.0 with a cat back and boost, at a best trap speed (not on the quickest run) of 99mph, for comparison.

Also on topic, 2.5 seconds for a 60ft is pretty slow, but its not easy to get it right. Anything near the 2 flat is doing pretty well. Whatever you shave off in the 60ft, double it and thats what will be off your time by the end (generally speaking this is pretty accurate)

If your car really is hitting 166kmph, you should be well into the 13s!

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

No, I think he's using an app on his iPhone which uses the GPS features to time himself. It's not all virtual :)

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

Really? Whoa... there are some major discrepancies with results in the drag area. I know there are many variables and we are talking about 20 year old cars which doesnt help, but thats good mph.

On the same track (We race at benaraby raceway) my mates SR sil, hiflo turbo, cooler, zorst, 17ish psi boost managed 98mph. Obviously you would expect higher if you are pulling 100 with such minimal mods, considering the SR has bucket loads or torque.

Without coming up with excuses most cars seem to be abit down on what they should be at Benaraby.

Then again, a dead stock JZX100 Chaser was pulling 94ish MPH, which is pretty much the same MPH I was pulling back when I first got the 34. Hmmmm its interesting. But from my expericences of sitting and watching/racing against, most 32 skylines with coolers and boost are not coming near 100mph.

Congrats to those who do though, you are obviously making some good power ;)

Well out of 3x 32's that I personally know over here all making the same power (my RB30 making an early 250rwhp, and two mates with RB20's sporting 25 turbos and all the usually bolt on stuff.. one untuned the other a de+t tuned), we've all run 102/103mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...