Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But if you asked me would you take a 240Z, a 350Z or hey even a 370Z, i would say the 240Z, because it purely is characteristic, it has balls to back itself, and simply it looks stunning. I find it hard pressed to compare the 240Z to that of a BNR34 (since i love GT-R's) because it looks THAT good!

I've seen maybe a few 240s or 260s in Unique Cars. They're going for around $40K for a neat stocker right?

Does anyone know if the original 240Z got its design inspiration from the 1960s E-type Jag (like maybe the Toyota 2000GT)? The proportions look similar.

370z

I just like it more.

Looks better in the flesh.

50/50 weight distribution.

heaps of power from an N/A (although I do love my boost!)

Higher build quality (from what I have seen)

Just a fantastic car that would have plenty of poke and not require an engine rebuild every 150,000kms

370z

I just like it more.

Looks better in the flesh.

50/50 weight distribution.

heaps of power from an N/A (although I do love my boost!)

Higher build quality (from what I have seen)

Just a fantastic car that would have plenty of poke and not require an engine rebuild every 150,000kms

LOL your seriously like the 2nd guy on here who has actually admited to this

your a rarity!

Yeah Jamie, I did. And I take your point. Pretty hard not to be biased when you own a Skyline, I know, but that's just how I figure. I love cars of all types and I thought the analogy would be interesting even if it was fantastical.

i know what you mean

but the thing is.....no matter what car is manufactured... no matter how ugly or how slow it is on the market....someone is bound to buy it & your bound to see one driving around.

and 370Z is an awsome N/A sports car........so im sure not 101% of the people out there would prefer the GT-R.

especially the way it was worded on this website on the first post.

being a skyline thread...your pretty much know your answer already.....people who own GTS-T or GT-Ts really HAIL the GT-R and worship Godzilla.

so in that car he shouldve asked "who here ACTUALLY prefers the 370Z over the GT-R"?

cause the result we saw was just quite boring....all you hear is "GTR GTR GTR GTR GTR GTR"

so it was intresting to read what iamhe77 wrote

  • 10 months later...

I faced this dilemma just recently after I wrote off my 350z (04) in the wet on the highway. I had a roadster, I hated the chassis flex, so I'm going to get a more ridged body shell.

I was really considering 370z for it's more refined designed and excellence in performance in terms of an NA. 370z no doubt looked more modern, but I dislike the fact that it has only has two seats, and relatively heavy for that matter. And I considered the fact it is rear wheel drive, it would be better if it is all wheel to put that power down to use on normal street tired, especially in the wet. It is a street car after all.

So I went for a R34 V spec II, 4 seat, all wheel drive. It drives well for its age. Only thing I found to my dislike at the moment is that I miss that low end torque of the VQ engine when claiming the hill in high gears.

Happy hunting!

  • 1 year later...

post-4266-1232876900_thumb.jpg

Would you say no??

Mate, gimme that car or I'd chop ur nuts off...seriously the 370Z is no comparison to the R34GT-R, whether its looks, performance, streed cred or whatever, IMHO...Saw a 370Z in flesh at Parramatta Nissan and I'm like meh, its kinda ok, but not for me...looks girly and too small, but thats just me..Maybe I'm biased because I drive a black GTT...love it tho..:thumbsup:

  • 1 month later...

When I brought my R34 gtr m-spec, the previous owner had a new 370z sitting in the garage next to the gtr - Funny thing is looking back, I didn’t even look at it! R34 GTR wins hands down for me.

  • 2 weeks later...

to be honest I think the new Z's are absolute rubbish. My mate had a 350Z and the interior looked like that of a old ford taxi. The new Z looks good outside but inside is still very plastic and cheap looking. R34 even after 12 odd years looks neat and well designed, by no means super modern just clean.

Imagine! Rich man with 7 cars in my garage!

Each month I'd drive the...

370Z for 1 day

Z1 2 days

C63 3 days

NSX 4 days

M3 5 days

Audi RS 6 days

R34 GT-R 7 days

Oh yes...

On that single day, I have to pick up my mother-in-law.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...