Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1. find nearest cliff

2. proceed with flat sticking

what do you mean 'is it bad for your car'? you thrash the f*ck out of it and cant see any potential problems?

Edited by VB-
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What i believe his saying is his holding his foot flat to the floor while the gearbox changes from first to second to third.

Really no different to reving out a manual almost to its limiter then doing a perfect gear change(remember its auto)

He'll only have problems if his boost is spiking which may cause it to hit the limiter.

But yeh, total dick for speeding through stop signs,thats just dumb dude.

1. a stop sign means stop suprisingly not this "flatstick" you talk about.

2. your probably bogging and slowing your car down from a stand still instead of making it go faster by doing this "flatstick"

3. let your car "flatstick" you to see if its doing any damage.

4. WTF is "flatstick"?

I drive an NA

It screams at high RPM

I love the sound

That is no excuse to "flat stick" it everywhere. Do you even let it warm up?? To be honest... I hate servicing Skylines that arent looked after properly. Like yours.

Btw, what the common speed you "flat stick" it to? 120kms? 130kms?

f**k u all. bunch of forum faggots. go f*k urselves, QQ.

if you dont like the forum then leave...

ppl on here r gonna tell it as they see it... and believe me when i say that what we see is a loser...

i think we can all agree with Skyln... GTFO dumbass

i do it in my skyline r33 all the time... apparantly my friend said its bad for my car.. but i prety mch flat-stick everytime i go past a stop sign..

*its because my car exhaust is rly loud and the only way to make it sound less loud is to flat stick.. thats jus how i drive . lol. its hard to explain.

haha nah, sounds better thats all.. instead of the droning noise from keeping it @ a certain speed..

Flat sticking makes it go- vrooom.. hard to explain ?

i dont think you even know what your talking about, 1st post its to make it quite next its to go vroom.

and indeed this thread does deliver. can someone tell me what qq is? is it as technical as flat sticking

Edited by Inline 6
f**k u all. bunch of forum top bloke toyboys. im gona go f*k myself, QQ. siff you dont all join me cuz i like to make vroom sounds when ive got a fat crammed up my arse

dude thats f**ked up :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...