Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks John! :)

I'm running HKS 246 in and 272 out step 2 cams from memory and the head is ported.

Autotech do all my tuning and servicing and Greg from Pro Engines did the engine build and head work.

I'm looking forward to seeing the results of the GT-RS's and I'd be expecting a minimum of 400awkw. I've spoken to Jim from Croydon and owners of some other big name Skylines who have given me a good idea of what to expect.

well if u have been @ autotech lately & noticed a black r32gtr, that is my car.

greg also built my engine, i had jim @ crd tune my car - you are definitely talking to the right people ;)

sorry about my last post...i thought your name was katrina lol

here is the link to my results: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...la-t277399.html

my 405awkw is on pump fuel, 23psi, although my boost would drop off to 20psi due to weak actuators in higher gears. with my new actuators should hold boost better & give a higher peak kw :)

Nah I didn't run it that day. I have other dyno sheets from dyno days but that was all before the rebuild. I don't have to prove anything to anyone so I don't care if people doubt it :)

LOL that is my name, I often get Kat for short but answer to both.

Cheers for the link I shall have a read! I haven't been out to Autotech yet this year, if my turbos are in I'll most likely be in there next week for a chat.

Hope to see your beast around some time!

Can I please get a bit of clarification about which turbo people are talking about when they refer to the "-9" that is the 'same' as the HKS GT-SS?

Is it the GT2859R - 707160-9 or the GT2860R - 739548-9?

I note the GT2859R has the same part number as the other -5 and -7 GT2860's (GT2860R - 707160-5/GT2860R - 707160-7) and am a bit confused...

Cheers

Yes hks gt-ss are same as Garrett gt2859r - 707160-9

r34 N1 = Garrett gt2860r - 707160-7

Don't believe there's too much differnce between these turbos

As I'm currently running -7s on stock motor and quite happy with them.

Good response but will have to upgrade to -5s or -10s when chasing for more power

Can I please get a bit of clarification about which turbo people are talking about when they refer to the "-9" that is the 'same' as the HKS GT-SS?

Is it the GT2859R - 707160-9 or the GT2860R - 739548-9?

I note the GT2859R has the same part number as the other -5 and -7 GT2860's (GT2860R - 707160-5/GT2860R - 707160-7) and am a bit confused...

Cheers

Check this out

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Tu...ty-t283705.html

  • 2 weeks later...
well if u have been @ autotech lately & noticed a black r32gtr, that is my car.

greg also built my engine, i had jim @ crd tune my car - you are definitely talking to the right people :)

sorry about my last post...i thought your name was katrina lol

here is the link to my results: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...la-t277399.html

my 405awkw is on pump fuel, 23psi, although my boost would drop off to 20psi due to weak actuators in higher gears. with my new actuators should hold boost better & give a higher peak kw :)

It's all in the head.. Markos, Kat's and Pete's that was referred to earlier are all running stock valves as well. Bigger turbos would be a waste if the head isn't working properly. A change back to a stock port head from what's on these with everything else the same costs 40kw atw. We've done the dyno tests to prove it. Sometimes the right airspeed and port shape is more important that peak cfm.

Ok just spotted this thread and thought I would give some info for people interested. Now I'm not really the type of person to go all out on modifying my car and spending every last cent I earn on my car but I do like to enjoy my car all the same as I drive it every day as a daily driver. I've had my car since september last year and as soon as I bought it my main priority was to make the car reliable as a daily driver. After reading a few different things on this forumn it was clear that the one thing that I needed to change were the original turbo's due to the horror stories of them exploding. Luckily for me 2 weeks after buying the car another member on here was selling a pair of HKS GTSS's so I promptly bought them. I also new that to get the car to run properly I would have to do something about the tune of the engine so opted for a Nistune. Again this option was chosen purely because it did everything I needed it to do without any un-necessary frills.

I took the car to have the nistune fitted and set up. Nothing else on the car has been changed other than the normal exhaust and filter by previous owner. Internals, injectors, fuel pump etc all standard.

The car made 376 Hp at 1.2 bar and was restricted by running out of fuel. Tuner said could of made it to 400 Hp if the fuel pump wasn't lazy.

Now I know this is probably no where near the power alot of other guys out there are making but I thought I would post it up so that anyone who is trying to make a decision on what turbo's to go for can at least see what can be expected on an other wise standard car with these turbo's.

Obviously with alot of other work with the heads/cams etc more would be possible.

I've attached a copy of my dyno sheet also.

Sorry for the long post but hopefully this will help.

Paul.

scan0036.pdf

1 of my most enjoyable setups was in my previous gtr, all i had was a plasmaman intercooler, custom 3" inch exhaust with tuned length front pipes (looked ridiculous but it worked), air filter & pfc...that made 242awkw.

it was fun because i could launch it, squeeze it hard etc & it was well balanced - the power was nice & not violent/intimidating :cool:

dont ask why i now have a 700hp setup, boredom i guess

  • 2 weeks later...

I wouldnt say no good and pointless i think the reality is if you have to go and buy new turbos for a fraction more you can get a better flowing turbo that compliments the engines capacity to breath resulting in better performance, no real lag difference to complain about, and room to move for others that want to do a few more mods down the track and have turbos that dont run out of puff to early and put a grin on your face every time you slam your foot down and listen to that RB26 revving all the way to 7200rpm still pulling hard.

After reading some of the threads regarding Dash 5s, 7s and 9s, its like people drive around in one gear only? (dyno charts) when you think a street GTR travels the first 60 foot in around 1.7 seconds off the mark in 1st gear, you are already well over 4500 rpm, then there's 2nd, 3rd, 4th and so on never dropping below 4500 rpm, surely its good by dick from then on! Go the 5s!!!

That's a fair point, by 5k RPM my car is making nearly 300awkw with the -5s, holding it all the way to redline, which is low power for them with plenty of scope for more.

It's well into positive pressure territory at only 2k RPM in higher gears, while the lower gears are geared low enough for it not to matter anyway.

My car is an extremely simple set up. No cam gears. Just R34 N1 manifolds (from tangomatt), R33 dumps and a full HKS silent exhaust.

That's my feelings... Personal choice I guess. Perhaps the -9s would have been plenty for me for now, but I made my choice and need to justify it in the name of morality. :thumbsup: Plans are an engine rebuild later on, after my car is resprayed so there is scope there without needing a new pair, or I could just rebuild my HKS 2530s.

Since when are people doing massive street RPM launches on daily driven cars? :)

The difference you feel is the response time of the turbos inbetween gears and so on.

You drive a car with -5s in reasonable traffic, then use a -9's... the -9's is much nicer and easier to drive, always will be.

On a circuit, change a gear, the smaller turbos will always be back on thier game sooner than larger ones.

I can scoot around in 5th @ 60km/h, just a touch of the throttle and boost is there should i want to see some acceleration.

I do not need to go digging for a lower gear like you would with the -5s or "wait" for them to spool to build momentum (which wont happen until 80km/h or so).

So it simply comes back to what you want power wise.

Anything less than 350rwkw is -9's. 370rwkw+ is -5's. Why have more lag/poor transient response than you need to for your given power target?

The car making 330rwkw @ 20psi (-9) is going to be much faster than a car making 330rwkw @ 15psi (-5).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...