Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a feeling this prototype one is going to push close to 300rwkws which wasn't what I'm hopping for, tune booked in on Monday so I should find out what happens. The current SS would push out 250rwkws with factory response.

As for the Holden VL we normally high flow the factory turbo with 3576 equivalent with our custom 58T 76mm comp wheel and .70 comp. That’s enough for it to produce around 300rwkws with pretty good response. Or you can use ATR45 in .82 rear, which is rated to about 650HP.

Stock comp housing is not in my preferred list unless used for KAI or PU profile high flows. They've got an surge grove just above stock comp wheel. Once machined to fit larger comp wheels, it leaves with a shallow grove in between the upper and lower blades. That acts as a Anti-surge slot which has small affects on mid range and top end power.

stockcompslot.JPG

PU/KAI profile with surge slot removed and intake nozzle back cut and shortened

kaihighflow1.jpg.JPG

More update for the SS profile:

atr43g2front.JPG

atr43g2rear.JPG

I've had that dyno tuned at status today (Big thanks for Trent's work). I've decided to use traditional sleeve bearing setup instead of ceramic ball bearings, as most people won't be paying that much for such a minior difference. Also I'm not very confident with the BB's "clean oil" theory when putting up with 20 years old engines. (of course I can't tell any one to bugger off and blame your engine oil as Garrett normally do).

This is also the very first FNT experiment with one customized blow nozzle.

Car Dynoed based on 9 sec ramp speed as always, not 12 or 13 secs for happy results.

BP 98 Fuel, No boost controller, No wastegate controller 286rwkws @ 17psi.

atr43ss286rwkw.jpg

atr43ss286rwkwboost.jpg

BP 98 Fuel, No boost controller, Wastegate controller wastegate controller set

320rwkws @ 20psi

atr43ss320rwkw.jpg

atr43ss320rwkwboost.jpg

I'm very happy with this results, Its not only as what appeared on paper, its made an very fast street car. boost comes in nice and early, smooth acceleration, minium wheel spin, hard pull till red line.

holds torque much longer and hence power doesn't dive over early like your other results, looks like the best result I've seen yet, on full song by 4k as well so not that laggy either for the power.

Yes I'm doing up some drawings on the custom blow nozzles for the current .82 rear housings. which should make a big difference to the current ATR43 and PU high flow's response. I should have that tested and ready in about 2 weeks, if all goes as planned we can carry out updates on customer's turbine housings.

Also my tune was done based on 9 sec ramp timing. I also did a comparison run based on 12 sec ramp timing (in red) which many of the dyno section sheets are, longer ramp rate makes all data appear slightly advanced. This is set depending on tuners preferences.

ps. in run below we were tried to add in more boost which didn't make any more power, so this turbo is fully maxed out at 320rwkws.

atr43ss315rwkw12sec.jpg

atr43ss315rwkw12secboost.jpg

Which of your turbos / hi flows would you recommend for 250ish rwkw at 1 bar (ish) for best response and mid range?

This superstreet seems very good. But with 80 or so pages. Finding an exact answer seems harder.

All supporting mods with no internal work.

Also, the stronger actuator you have for internally gated turbos runs at what boost as a minimum?

Thanks

The ATR43SS appeared above would be the best option for that sort of HP. Or if you have a stock R33 or R34 turbo we can also high flow that to archive the same HP goal (250rwkws). The high pressure actuator is recommended as it can hold more boost up on top and excellent working with EBC or MBC.

Would you get the same results with the hi flow? It's for a r33. The high pressure actuator is obviously needed, I was more asking if they were left On the turbo with no additional boost controller fitted. Would the actuator hold boost? Anf if so what boost on a high flow

There are some results of a standard and KAI profile high flow for R33 stock turbo in page one. There has been few updates on the turbine side of it since. The current one should have no issues producing around 240rwkws with high pressure actuator, the driving ability is great on road.

Also my tune was done based on 9 sec ramp timing. I also did a comparison run based on 12 sec ramp timing (in red) which many of the dyno section sheets are, longer ramp rate makes all data appear slightly advanced. This is set depending on tuners preferences.

Stao How can I find out the ramp speed tuners have used? is that addressed on the sheet? its obviously meaningless in comparison with others unless the ramp rate is identical.

It seems your atr28 g2 profile would be suitable for 230rwkw @ 1 bar on a r33 with pretty good response. Is that correct. Any hi flow with a little more power with a bit more lag?

Is this very similar to the same profile for ca18 and sr20

Well you don't need a .82 rear for 230rwkws. Its more made for high torque 300rwkws applications, that would make a laggy 230rwkws on road. I think high flow based on stock R33 turbo would be your best option for a fast street driven 230rwkws.

Also with the ramp rate, you won't really know it unless its been addressed. Few obvious tails I've noticed with the Dyno pack dyno that I've used:

atr43ss315rwkw12sechighlight.JPG

Notice the high lighted dip and flat bit, you will find that with 12 sec ramp timing on stock Rb25dets. I will do runs on both ramp speeds from now on.

the 230kw version looks worse than the 320kw version in every respect, even at 3000rpm it is making 20kw less, comes on full song at 4k like the newer one and then tops out at 230kw, is the main difference the transient response? As I know with my gcg highflowed rb20 turbo it makes ~240kw that feels like a stock turbo, on full song by 3k though it does have a BB core.

Is it possible to use the new tech you've used in your 320kw turbo in the smallest sized ones to make say 230-250kw with much better response? or are these benefits entirely due to the different front housing you are using?

Also could you explain a bit more about this blow angle you've changed, what is the theory behind what effect it has on the turbo's performance, as from what I can see this is the main thing that has changed and it seems to have resulted in similar response just it holds torque much longer through the rev range and hence power keeps climbing.

Edited by Rolls

Have to concur, that's the exact same dip my standard RB25 made when I dynoed it...what's the reasoning for it occurring with a 12 second ramp rate?

Very odd, because everyone else thought the dyno was reading low that day...but with the longer ramp rate it should have been more optimistic?

the 230kw version looks worse than the 320kw version in every respect, even at 3000rpm it is making 20kw less, comes on full song at 4k like the newer one and then tops out at 230kw, is the main difference the transient response? As I know with my gcg highflowed rb20 turbo it makes ~240kw that feels like a stock turbo, on full song by 3k though it does have a BB core.

Is it possible to use the new tech you've used in your 320kw turbo in the smallest sized ones to make say 230-250kw with much better response? or are these benefits entirely due to the different front housing you are using?

[/]

+1

  • Like 1

There are 2x major updates with the SS model.

1st: as mentioned customized blow nozzle. Allows re-direction of hot air to where its needed for the most shaft speed.

I’ve done few drawings and models back in 09, except the building method was too expansive and time consuming to produce and sale. Few close customers have seen my older model, which is on held. This re-constructed model was very time efficient and cost effective to build, it worked as expected. Result was done with a single blow nozzle, I’ve also got a triple nozzle dawning which should be a great upgrade for the ATR43 G3 .82 turbine housing. (will be tested soon)

2nd: Comp wheel. Stronger materials, light weight, greater flow per-rotation.

Not sure if you’ve noticed this SS turbo runs off a machined billet 71mm comp wheel, with stronger materials I’ve shaved out the center hub leaving greater air gaps and larger fins. It is equivalent to a 76mm in 56 Trim wheel with half of its weight.

Back on the high flow agenda, Standard high flow profile has been updated many times through the past 3 years. Results from 09 do not represent 11. Current high flows run a different turbine and waste gating (affective with high pressure actuators) system producing more torque and greater power. I will do some runs with them to update the out dated results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've heard the Tomei USA head gaskets are decent if you want to o-ring the heads but otherwise not recommended.
    • The 296mm rotors are the R33 turbo brakes. The 310mm rotors are the R34 turbo brakes. The calipers are nearly the same, but not. They're the same caliper but the R34 caliper has longer legs so that it sits out far enough to go over the rotor. The pads are the same for both. When you say, "I bough tsome EBC"....did you just mean pads? Or rotors? 310mm rotors fit under 17" wheels. There may be some wheels without enough clearance though. I can't fit my fingers between the barrel of my wheel and the "corners" of my R34 calipers, but there is plenty of room behind the spokes. This is on Enkei RPF1. You can fit 324mm rotors inside a 17" wheel, but I'd be willing to bet that it would be close to impossible with the Nissan/Sumitomo caliper (using an adapter, of course), because the Sumitomo caliper is fatter than the Brembo caliper that is supposed to go on the 324mm rotors.
    • Hi. Can someone tell me what brakes(and mainly WHERE) can i buy brakes on R34 GTT? I bought some EBC which SHOULD go on my car(i have GT but it has GTT brakes) but it does not fit, Brakes are "too" small(296mm) Are 310mm be good or? I have 17 inch wheel so no "big boys" but for me driving i just need one that fits and i can get here in EU/Czech.
    • Since winter isn't that harsh anymore in Poland, i will definetely drive it 365 days a year 😉. But if the snow hits i will try it for sure and let U know. Only swap i am planning to do is of course R34 GTR front 😍.
    • Hey. Very valuable information about pitwork, I will pay attention when buying any consumable parts 🙏 As for the carpets - I got a handful of information from nengun, from which it appears that indeed the carpets for the driver's side are OEM. They are not able to show me any pictures due to the long chain of different sales entities but after I place the order, as soon as the goods arrive at the nengun warehouse from which they will send the shipment to me they can send me photos and if my purchase differs from OEM I can immediately return it / cancel the purchase. I think I will give it a try 😉. Of course i'll let you know what's what as soon as i get them P.s. I know the topic is not relevant to the thread, but both nengun and amayama have these SICK 😍 trunk room lamps available. Do you know anyone who ordered them? I need to have one in my car
×
×
  • Create New...