Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh and after I get my SS1PU tuned on PULP, I'll be seeing what E85 can do in the top end for the response monster :)

I went with the G3 because it makes more torque at each rpm increment than the SS2, and it makes more power under the curve (don't just look at boost or response here, the G3 is making more power everywhere than the SS2). The SS2 only catches up in the higher rpm to make the same power, the G3 beats it everywhere else, even if it's only just.

On Stao's results anyway, I haven't got those results yet.

Attached Stao's graph of G3 vs SS2,. they are so identical - I do not look at the boost response as you saying - I look at the power it is making at rpm points - 2000rpms, 3000, 4000, 5000... At the first three points the SS2 is clearly making more power hence more responsive and better for the street, but the G3 catches up around 5000rpms at 260ish rwkws and beats the SS2 from there but not by much. The SS2 also makes significantly more torque at these points too and peak torque is hardly different between the two.

So I still dont understand why the G3 is more popular with you guys apart from the cost..pinch.gif

post-49401-0-00055700-1329956174_thumb.jpg

post-49401-0-58037400-1329956183_thumb.jpg

Haha yes, it's like that now. Read back through the thread, there have been multiple changes to the G3 and SS2 that have affected their power curves since I bought mine, the graphs you are comparing are the latest ones. I will see if I can find the graph that I used to compare the two when I bought mine. The G3 kills the SS2 for peak torque however you look at it though, not sure what you're going on there.

One of the other main reasons I went with the G3 is because I track my car, so heat is a very important factor for me. Stao mentioned that the G3 was not getting hot at all during tuning and he was running it as high as 23psi. For sure I would have gone the SS2 if my car was purely a streeter, but I took different things into account such as the high rpm performance of the two, heat factors, etc. etc.

Cost was also a factor I'll be honest, Stao sold me the G3 that came straight off his car for the same price I was able to sell my old G2 for, so the swap cost me virtually nothing.

Edited by Hanaldo

so heat is a very important factor for me. Stao mentioned that the G3 was not getting hot at all during tuning and he was running it as high as 23psi. For sure I would have gone the SS2 if my car was purely a streeter, but I took different things into account such as the high rpm performance of the two, heat factors, etc. etc.

Makes sense now - G3 would be better at consistent high rpms/ tracking due to bigger exhaust housing (laggier?)...Cleared that up for me now thanks - as for peak torque G3 vs SS2 = 514Nm vs 497Nm - hardly much to go by..

I'm more worried about heat soak and super-heating of the intake charge. When you're at a consistent high rpm (I don't think I was ever below 4500rpm on my last time out) around the track there is obviously going to be a lot of heat. As I don't have an ECU capable of pulling fuel/timing based on intake air temperature, I wanted to avoid super-heating the air and causing detonation.

Does that mean the SS series turbos SS1, SS1PU and SS2 are not ideal for tracking due to their tendencies to heat up real quick (small exhaust housings, high boost etc) at constant high rpms?? :wacko:

I wouldn't go as far as saying that, but the name SuperStreet sort of gives an indication as to their intended use don't you think? ;)

The SS series is more than likely fine for the track, I'm simply paranoid :P I looked at two turbos with very similar performance, one looked more suitable than the other for what I wanted so I went with that.

Don't forget that these turbos are forever changing and gettin better though, it's like buying a mobile phone. You buy the top of the range model when it first comes out and 6 months later it's redundant. My reasons for buying the G3 possibly don't apply anymore.

Ive been away since the start of this year so did not have time to troubleshoot my lack of power and finish the tune with my SS1PU. Finally back home and having the car sorted out tomorrow. With some luck I hope it wont be too hard to work out the power loss issue before completing the tune.

Any more? ;)

My car is on the dyno right now. Major boost leak was caused by the rubber intake manifold gasket... cant wait to see how it goes.

Does that mean the SS series turbos SS1, SS1PU and SS2 are not ideal for tracking due to their tendencies to heat up real quick (small exhaust housings, high boost etc) at constant high rpms?? :wacko:

I bought the SS1PU specifically because Stao said its a cool running turbo, good for the track. Hopefully this is really the case.

I think the SS1PU is a good thing all round, stao has put some hard effort into it and it works well.

looking forward to your results.

I bought the SS1PU specifically because Stao said its a cool running turbo, good for the track. Hopefully this is really the case.

Temperature is a function of boost remember so even if you get the smaller rear housing turbos as long as you don't try and push 25psi through them on the track on BP98 you will be fine.

Ultimately setting up your ECU with coolant temp and intake temperature fuel and ignition trim is the ultimate way, even better if you can trim boost as well!

That way you can tune it to run 25psi on the street and as soon as it starts to get hot on the track the ECU will automatically adjust to keep it safe.

Ive noticed the effects of heat soak on my car but that is generally after big drives(2hr+) on hot days. Not so much detonation rising etc but just doesn't feel as... oomphy when shit gets too hot.

That is just heat soak killing performance by heating the intake charge. You won't notice heatsoak in the turbo etc, you will just be slowly removing your margin of error for detonation until it gets so hot you detonate, and you don't always hear detonation as well so be careful.

I always advise people to do two tests, one is on a warm day eg 28c give the car a good flogging then immediately stop without cooling it down and idle around at 10kph for a good 10-15 minutes getting massive heat soak, then go rev out 3rd gear once again without cooling it down. If it is going to detonate due to intake temps it will do so then.

The next test is to just do high load dyno run over and over again to get the turbo/manifold red hot. This will also usually cause detonation if you have a small turbo that really chokes up.

Result for my SS1 PU are in:

Overall its not bad but not the best

-Peak power 244kw

-Makes about 200kw at 4000rpm (good, expected)

-Boost goes from 21psi in midrange to 17psi in top end

-Tuner reckons something is holding it back since its doesnt make that power in the top end easily however he is not sure what it is

-Tuner reckons that it comes on too hard with the current actuator so they had to massively reduce timing (which he is not happy with) so it would not ping in the mid range

-If they use the EBC at all there is too much boost low down so they are not using it

-If it had a lower pressure actuator he thinks they could run lower boost and more timing down low, then higher boost up top and more peak power

I will pick it up tomorrow morning, tuner had not yet driven it when i spoke to him.

He thinks it will feel very fast and pull hard so it may not be worth chasing more top end.

The ss1pu has a pretty large turbine housing, that model gains response from fnt turbine and lightened billet machined comp wheel. It was pretty happy on 22psi on mine, shouldn't have any issues downlow. Might be interested to find out what's holding it back. ill have a chat with Trent regarding to the tune experience, Keen to see few more results. Also i can supply a 15 psi actuator to run ebc with if you are keen to twick it bit further.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...