Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Kasko you need to be aware that the feeling you're after doesn't last, you do get used to it. Like you keep referring to your stock turbo giving the feeling you're after, yet if I was to go for a ride in a stock GTT I bet it would feel like I was in a Getz.

Probably the reason why modding is so ridiculously addictive.

My stock r33 felt like a super car web I got out of an auto Mazda 323 into it haha

Cheers for all the info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heres my torque graph. Never noses over. Keeps climbing. Maybe we should all run small wastegates and let the boost climb the more the rpm increases.

What kind of pussy are you? just weld it shut like all the cool kids whistling.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of pussy are you? Just get a eBay split dump pipe like all the cool kids.

P.S. let's be careful not to confuse rear wheel torque with engine torque...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's... Exactly what I said. Lol.

Most likely because of my lack of VCT, my G3 doesn't build torque very quickly. It still creates a lot of torque, but it's not a steep curve. My mates TD05 actually has a steeper torque curve, despite being more responsive. It makes less peak torque and less peak power, but the shape of his curve gives his car more of the rush.

Kasko, you need to be aware that the feeling you're after doesn't last, you do get used to it. Like you keep referring to your stock turbo giving the feeling you're after, yet if I was to go for a ride in a stock GTT I bet it would feel like I was in a Getz.

Haha ok but not having VCT would make it more of a rush because below 4500rpm you would have less power but the same top end as the ECU turns it off around then anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heres my torque graph. Never noses over. Keeps climbing. Maybe we should all run small wastegates and let the boost climb the more the rpm increases.

Seriously though thats what I have always thought it would be good to have boost gradually climbing to stop the torque dropping off.

Obvious problem is though on a really cold night etc because the wastegate is maxxed out the boost would climb higher and could get you into trouble. I suppose if you had the tune allow for this it could be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries, DVS JEZ on this forum tuned it - he has the dyno data for it also :action-smiley-069:

As has been discussed many times on this forum; "Torque" generally can not be compared between Dynos as they measure tractive effort and the torque reading depends on the calibration of the Dyno. Hence saying your 207rwkw SR20 has the torque of a 300kw RB25 is not correct. As you can see from Jez's graph on the previous page, his 300rwkw produces "700Nm" of torque on his Dyno.

A reliable way to calculate actual wheel torque is to use the Power and RPM readings:

T = (Px60x1000)/(RPMx2xPi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously though thats what I have always thought it would be good to have boost gradually climbing to stop the torque dropping off.

Obvious problem is though on a really cold night etc because the wastegate is maxxed out the boost would climb higher and could get you into trouble. I suppose if you had the tune allow for this it could be ok.

See the way I see it if you are running the max airflow a turbo can provide at redline, then that same airflow at x psi will be x+y psi in the midrange, hence you should run more boost in the midrange to make the most of the turbo.

Like if you look at the compressor map then the same airflow at redline at 20psi is 25psi in the midrange. So if you can get away with running more boost at redline, you should increase the midrange boost to make the most of it.

Which is why I think turbos should be set based on airflow not psi. Though if you do it this way you are always going to have a massive midrange spike and have torque fall off by redline which just doesn't feel as good for some people, though for drifting etc it is perfect.

Thoughts people?

Can you explain????? My car made 625Nm of Torque but my auto could only handle 212 rwkw

625nm of tractive torque, not torque at the engine, dynos don't measure engine torque they measure tractive effort.

if you are making 530nM at 4200rpm then you are ALWAYS make 233 kw at 4200rpm, it isn't possible to be anything else.

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow night. A customers tyres got slashed at his place so ive finally got some dyno time to my self. Will post in kando thread

Must have been my exhaust that rowelled everyone up lol

FKN NOISY ASS CAR *slashes wrong dudes tyres*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heres my torque graph. Never noses over. Keeps climbing. Maybe we should all run small wastegates and let the boost climb the more the rpm increases.

The reason behind that is because your car is running on E85, High mount exhaust manifold and external gate.

Run pump 98, internally gated with stock manifold. That power and torque figure will drop significantly after 6000RPM. which is like:

2012-01-301934201.jpg

There are lot more to think about when building a turbo made to perform on Pump 98 and internally gated. A turbo that can deliver performance internally gated on pump 98, has no issues cracking the extra KWs on external gate with E85.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See the way I see it if you are running the max airflow a turbo can provide at redline, then that same airflow at x psi will be x+y psi in the midrange, hence you should run more boost in the midrange to make the most of the turbo.

Like if you look at the compressor map then the same airflow at redline at 20psi is 25psi in the midrange. So if you can get away with running more boost at redline, you should increase the midrange boost to make the most of it.

Which is why I think turbos should be set based on airflow not psi. Though if you do it this way you are always going to have a massive midrange spike and have torque fall off by redline which just doesn't feel as good for some people, though for drifting etc it is perfect.

Thoughts people?

Yeah if your car can put the extra mid range torque to the ground then sure. And that is specifically to do with a turbocharger.

In my previous setup it would spin the tyres when it hit boost in the mid range and then torque would fall off higher in the rev range so when you finally got traction it had lost a lot of torque.

I am more talking from a traction point of view. As speed increases, the greater torque you can put to the ground without wheelspin. Therefore ideally for maximum acceleration given a set amount of traction you would have torque increase with rpm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more talking from a traction point of view. As speed increases, the greater torque you can put to the ground without wheelspin. Therefore ideally for maximum acceleration given a set amount of traction you would have torque increase with rpm.

From a traction perspective totally agree, in fact you see a lot of factory cars do tricky things to do exactly this, a sharp rise in torque almost always induces wheelspin.

Look at the 3L TT inline 6 BMW engines, all sorts of trickery to keep the torque flatish and not have massive peaks like our cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...