Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so you are changing the compressor cover profile?, if it works you can mod all other G3's for a cost?

i started to fit mine last night, but will take me a month or 2 to do as i am modifying the whole car and only have 3-4hrs

a week to work on it, so if this works im interested

I was confused as in your picture, you have the a comp wheel and housing, and above it is a billet wheel by the looks..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Its the profile in the housing. will still be using original cast G3 comp wheel. So the modification can be carried out on any G3s easily (or freely).

The billet wheel was from a SS3 I made a roller version of that as well.

no worries. So do you want as much power as possible out of it or preferably stock response?

i want great response mate. dont forget im rockin an auto so lag will kill me. love it to come on boost early with great midrange.

let me know your thoughts!

Ok I will use same profile that I've done for ssxricho, it will have very similar response to stock while produce more power and torque with a very wide power band.

Dyno reading and reference is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__view__findpost__p__6352727

Results from Ball bearing G3 with updated comp profile:

E85 high mounted externally gated: Maxing out at 365rwkws

power.jpg

boost.jpg

VS the older G3:

powervs.jpg

boostvs.jpg

I've also done one more run with the The ATRSL25.5G. Little bit pissed as I'm missing 1KWs reaching 400rwkws. Maxed out at 399.1rwkws. Need bigger cams for the full potential of this turbo. Still, this is the highest power ever archived on stock cam from Trent's dyno library.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Its actually very fast, the power delivery is so gradual theres hardly any wheel spin. I'm getting some mickey thompson drag tyres and hitting the strip soon.I think this one can get into the 11sec mark

Lol awesome!

Also glad to see an ss1pu trapping good speed! Good work Daniel!

Haha I think it's not a great indication, everyone keeps telling me its an insane mph.

Also that the airport is way way different to the actual drags

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...