Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

I've been running the BB G3 with the latest comp profile for about 1000KMs so far and it appears to hold together well. I can swap this one with any G3 owner for free. PM me if interested.

Dyno results of standard and latest BB unit:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-352

result only shown difference in 4th gear to floor. the transition and throttle response between the two is quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking at running water meth injection, whats a safe boost level for the tATR43?

You can run till it stops making power. Around 24psi

Hey Stao do you mean even my thrust bearing g3 can be updated to BB aswell as the updated comp housing?

Yes I can rebuild your bush bearing G3 into ball bearing and updated comp housing. in this case I will swap you with the one that is currently in my car free. I will need your turbocharger back for a day or two for a small modification on the turbine housing as well as the comp housing.

The ball bearing update can apply to all Gx, Gx based Rb highflows, SS2, and SS3 turbochargers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Went out to WSID last night to run the car for first time since my PU highflow.

First run was a 13.2 @ 115mph with a rubbish 2.2 60ft

Second run does not bear a mention and then it PISSED DOWN RAIN

I was really hoping to bust into the 12's but im not sure it (or the useless driver!) will manage it.

Anyway, just thought id share that with the internets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to get fast time you will need small rims with fat simeslick tyres (hint from Trent), I used to skit all over 3rd gear with a G3 on my road tyres and that was a slow 330rwkws. Run RSRs or better will help heaps.

After doing abit of reading on the net, its not a bad time for a stock weighted R33 internally gated, stock manifold on pump 98 at that power level, there is a huge difference in mid to top end range torque with high mount and external gate after 120km/h. But I don't know how the car run slower and slower after each pull.

Also G3 is changing, I will post some photos of the latest G3 tomorrow, in hopping for the same power level with much better throttle response, it will also be equipped with the latest bearing and lubrication setup as well as optional ball bearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Went out to WSID last night to run the car for first time since my PU highflow.

First run was a 13.2 @ 115mph with a rubbish 2.2 60ft

Second run does not bear a mention and then it PISSED DOWN RAIN

I was really hoping to bust into the 12's but im not sure it (or the useless driver!) will manage it.

Anyway, just thought id share that with the internets

Nice, sounds on the money to me. I did 13.3 @ 112mph off a 2.2s 60ft with a bit less power on street tyres on an airstrip with my GT3076R. Put stickier tyres on it and ran 12.6 @ 112mph off a 1.9s 60ft (same strip, same driver... I was still learning how to make it work, not great traction) - it took me low 2.0s 60fts to get into the 12s from memory so not far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

You will find the BB G3 with the latest comp profile changes that power delivery behavior by a lot. It smooths the power delivery pattern, which takes out that big launch behavior, sticks the car on the road better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

That lag you explained would absolutely kill mph, if its that bad...glad im auto..lol,

looking at the G3 drag vids, they do look lazy

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...