Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been running the BB G3 with the latest comp profile for about 1000KMs so far and it appears to hold together well. I can swap this one with any G3 owner for free. PM me if interested.

Dyno results of standard and latest BB unit:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-352

result only shown difference in 4th gear to floor. the transition and throttle response between the two is quite different.

looking at running water meth injection, whats a safe boost level for the tATR43?

You can run till it stops making power. Around 24psi

Hey Stao do you mean even my thrust bearing g3 can be updated to BB aswell as the updated comp housing?

Yes I can rebuild your bush bearing G3 into ball bearing and updated comp housing. in this case I will swap you with the one that is currently in my car free. I will need your turbocharger back for a day or two for a small modification on the turbine housing as well as the comp housing.

The ball bearing update can apply to all Gx, Gx based Rb highflows, SS2, and SS3 turbochargers.

Hi all,

Went out to WSID last night to run the car for first time since my PU highflow.

First run was a 13.2 @ 115mph with a rubbish 2.2 60ft

Second run does not bear a mention and then it PISSED DOWN RAIN

I was really hoping to bust into the 12's but im not sure it (or the useless driver!) will manage it.

Anyway, just thought id share that with the internets

It dyno'd at 280ish rwkw but it does feel a little down on hp. That being said i did have some problems with traction off the line.

What sort of trap speed should i be expecting assuming the 280kw?

Well to get fast time you will need small rims with fat simeslick tyres (hint from Trent), I used to skit all over 3rd gear with a G3 on my road tyres and that was a slow 330rwkws. Run RSRs or better will help heaps.

After doing abit of reading on the net, its not a bad time for a stock weighted R33 internally gated, stock manifold on pump 98 at that power level, there is a huge difference in mid to top end range torque with high mount and external gate after 120km/h. But I don't know how the car run slower and slower after each pull.

Also G3 is changing, I will post some photos of the latest G3 tomorrow, in hopping for the same power level with much better throttle response, it will also be equipped with the latest bearing and lubrication setup as well as optional ball bearing.

Hi all,

Went out to WSID last night to run the car for first time since my PU highflow.

First run was a 13.2 @ 115mph with a rubbish 2.2 60ft

Second run does not bear a mention and then it PISSED DOWN RAIN

I was really hoping to bust into the 12's but im not sure it (or the useless driver!) will manage it.

Anyway, just thought id share that with the internets

Nice, sounds on the money to me. I did 13.3 @ 112mph off a 2.2s 60ft with a bit less power on street tyres on an airstrip with my GT3076R. Put stickier tyres on it and ran 12.6 @ 112mph off a 1.9s 60ft (same strip, same driver... I was still learning how to make it work, not great traction) - it took me low 2.0s 60fts to get into the 12s from memory so not far away.

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

You will find the BB G3 with the latest comp profile changes that power delivery behavior by a lot. It smooths the power delivery pattern, which takes out that big launch behavior, sticks the car on the road better.

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

That lag you explained would absolutely kill mph, if its that bad...glad im auto..lol,

looking at the G3 drag vids, they do look lazy

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...