Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Craig don't you have the Haltech installed? Is it the PS2000?

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Ahh ok...I think the Etuner's site has your car there listed with haltech....that's why I asked

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I had the Impul on by itself......I also had just put on the suction pipe and the fabricators had not followed my instructions correctly so I had a slight over boosting problem and as the Impul has no restrictions it helped me to melt a cylinder.

Never had a PS2000 on my car!

Ironpaw where is this Etuners site you speak of....I might have to go and update it a little!huh.gif

.....and if I remember correctly OZ is punching bigger numbers than Japan with the E-manage ultimate with a VQ25det!

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I need to find someone stupid enough to sit in the car with me and film:P....where Andy when I need him...lol!....I wont do it again until the shift kit goes in either!.....then I might have to do a quarter run!

Edited by Jetwreck

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

I'm breathing just fine buddy!

Hey did they post up the dyno sheet.....I remember seeing a couple but that was a while ago.......want to compare to Scott's and mine....cannot find in in my J a p browser for some reason!

So what's that advantage of the Fcon units?

Edited by Jetwreck

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

DO WANT THIS!!!

hurry up!!! before my reno funds dry up!! :ninja:

No dyno sheet unfortunately.

Both F-con's intercept the signal from the ECU to the engine and modify it as per the tune, but they are quite different.

Fcon iS is pretty much an eManage Ultimate + Vmanage, but with a Video output... and it looks pretty (not that you'd see it :P).

That being that it add's/subtracts to the OEM ECU's signals (timing, fuel etc etc).

The problem with this is that the stock ECU is damn clever and will react to the return signal accordingly.

(ie Ecu sends signal to engine, iS intercepts signal and adds a fixed number of degrees to the timing, signal returns from engine to stock ECU, ECU takes additional timing out to bring it in line with what the stock levels "should" be, iS intercepts and adds it's fixed number again - which is now less due to the reduction in timing in the "send" signal from the ECU).

I guess the trick here is to tune outside of the stock ECU's limits :)

Fcon V-Pro intercepts the OEM ECU signal and completely replaces the them with the "tuned" information, so regardless of what the stock ECU receives and adjusts for in the return signal, the V-Pro dictates the parameters in it's "base" tune to the Engine.

Edited by iamhe77

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I think it is 79%. If no one else weighs in to say differently l can plug it in & do a test. I do know that I can't get above 87%, ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...