Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Adelaide Turbo Services highflow for an RB25

consists of a machined-out stock Nissan 45V4 compressor housing, a Garrett GT3076 Chra 60-trim, and AVO .73 Skyline exhaust housing

plus oil feed line, oil return pipe, water return pipe and modified M24 fitting, all Speedflow fittings

ask for a quote, ~$2500 for the kit (discounted to $2200 in exchange for parts I supplied for their shelf)

Bolt on - If I can do it being 201cm tall and no knees then anyone can install it themselves (although my back is still farked lol)

Automatic, AWD, 1997 S2 RB25det

Nissan Stagea RS-Four Wagon 105,000kms

239kw

scan0001-2.jpg

will add S15 480cc injectors and a fresh ecu remap later down the track.

have a 4" magnaflow muffler to go on & a 3x 2"din gauge set for boost, oil temp & pressure

drives so so nicely. very very happy

  • 3 weeks later...

Good stuff tangles, glad you made the power you wanted after all the mucking around! Did you make that power with a Toshi remap?! And standard injectors? I didn't know the remap could support such a large turbo upgrade.. Can Toshi remap to suit bigger injectors too? :)

At what RPM do you get full boost on the street? Got any issues with the auto handling the power?

hey mate

auto is loving it and hasnt missed a beat at all.

definately in its prime, isnt stressing the gearbox at all.

boost starts at 2500rpm, full boost by 3900rpm and holds 1.05 bar (current setting) all the way to redline

4000rpm she's picking up her skirts and pushing you back in your seat. a good feeling >_<

very very very satisfied with the ATS GT3076r

  • 4 weeks later...
hey mate

auto is loving it and hasnt missed a beat at all.

definately in its prime, isnt stressing the gearbox at all.

boost starts at 2500rpm, full boost by 3900rpm and holds 1.05 bar (current setting) all the way to redline

4000rpm she's picking up her skirts and pushing you back in your seat. a good feeling :thumbsup:

very very very satisfied with the ATS GT3076r

it's not a GT3076, it's a GT3071R (with 84 trim cropped turbine wheel).

much smaller than the GT3076R.

it's not a GT3076, it's a GT3071R (with 84 trim cropped turbine wheel).

much smaller than the GT3076R.

Wow thats interesting, the spool is no better (if not a little worse) than my full GT3076R running a .82a/r turbine housing!!

it's not a GT3076, it's a GT3071R (with 84 trim cropped turbine wheel).

much smaller than the GT3076R.

How can you tell from those photos? You'd really need to measure the exducer diameter to know for sure

Its no real surprise that your turbos are better all-round performers than this one. Remember that yours were designed as a complete package by garrett, but the ATS turbo has the wrong wheels for the housings (despite the fact they are machined to fit)

That's the compromise for having things looking standard i guess.

The same wheels in the right housing would no doubt bring on boost sooner and go on to make more power, but then he would need to worry about manifold to comp housing clearance, external gate and lots of other non-standard things

Also no doubt you guys have the newer generation comp wheel, whereas the ATS one has the old-school T04S wheel

Edited by too_much_boost

meh, its pretty fricken quick in my book.

on road the turbo pulls the lard-arse stag up past 180 (speedo end) very quickly, its a 12sec 1/4mile wagon (well, we'd know for sure if adelaide had a track....)

Ive got some 8x S15 injectors to flowtest & drop in best 6, more tuning, and I'll be damned happy with whatever result; she's my Stag.

:):D

to the haters, meh / booh :P at the end my hard earned is only so much & only goes so far, so to have the potential end result of ~260kw-? is pretty pleasing.

docile yet devilish :thumbsup::rofl:

Great, but you could have made the same power with a std GTST hiflow for less $$$ and single component chnage over.

For $2500 I would have brought a real 3076 and had change to fit up [probably need another 500-1000 though], oh wait i already did that......

But 240rwkw is a fun car

yeah but I went from a "gtst hiflow" ......

as far as Im aware, my invoice states GT3076, and Bill the owner of ATS who made it say its their version of a bolt on skyline hybrid/highflow GT3076 turbo

capable of 280rwkw+on cool days like today at 1.2bar boost its at around 250rwkw

more fuel from the 450-480cc s15 injectors will comfortably see 260rwkw plus ....... from the family awd auto wagon :D

The first page says 71mm comp wheel, therefore 3071 AFAIK. I would agree its probably a good setup for the power you are making, however i can see 260rwkw without leaning on it heavily. For over 250 i would use a proper 3071, over 280 a 3076

The first page says 71mm comp wheel, therefore 3071 AFAIK. I would agree its probably a good setup for the power you are making, however i can see 260rwkw without leaning on it heavily. For over 250 i would use a proper 3071, over 280 a 3076

You are right, i missed that bit. I suspect that these aren't actually the specs though else ATS wouldn't be marketing it as a 3076. One would assume they would know better than that.

Garrett ball bearing core, internal wastegate, GT3071R

Garrett plate # IMM120880 700177-3

Compressor

Wheel Dia Trim A/R

Ind-53.1mm Exd-71.0mm 56 0.50

Turbine

Wheel Dia Trim A/R

56.5mm 84 0.64

Modified by ATS Adelaide Turbo Services - $2500 kit price

You are right, i missed that bit. I suspect that these aren't actually the specs though else ATS wouldn't be marketing it as a 3076. One would assume they would know better than that.

hmm, Ive got those specs wrong ey, from the Garrett web page.

definately .60 not .50

lol best to speak to Bill directly at ATS (adelaide turbo services) - was recommended to go there by a few "names" and dropped them all to him, so he wouldbt be short changing me TBH.....

he gave me cash discount, a discount on new parts I gave him, and supplied a pretty mean gt30-based custom turbo

Im damned happy with the purchase, and will stay happy like a pig in shit until I do the bottom end @ max out the turbo efficiency :teehee:

next plans:

* add 6x S15 injectors, tune to 260kw

* rebuild bottom end; pistons, rods, N1 pumps & remap 280kw

* rebuild auto gearbox, freshen up silky snow pearl paint

* over the next 5yrs or so.....

meh, its pretty fricken quick in my book.

on road the turbo pulls the lard-arse stag up past 180 (speedo end) very quickly, its a 12sec 1/4mile wagon (well, we'd know for sure if adelaide had a track....)

Ive got some 8x S15 injectors to flowtest & drop in best 6, more tuning, and I'll be damned happy with whatever result; she's my Stag.

:P:P

to the haters, meh / booh :cool: at the end my hard earned is only so much & only goes so far, so to have the potential end result of ~260kw-? is pretty pleasing.

docile yet devilish :blush::)

Didn't adelaide have AIR?

does anyone have a G-Tech you could borrow?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...