Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 19/11/2011 at 7:56 AM, fomby639 said:

cheers joe but i think im gona go the gt3582r twin scroll from fullrace, good price at $1395, guess it will prob cost a fair bit more by the time it gets here from the states. does anyone know if there is a Aus distributor for the 35r TS or is the custom ATP rear the only one?

I would reconsider choosing the ts gt35 over the alternatives... the ts rear housing is very large and obscures much of the core making it very difficult to get spanners onto. The casting quality from ATP is quite poor as well (purely cosmetic though). I have photos of the gt35 ts and bw options if you want to compare.

Keep in mind shipping from full race will cost you 150-200US, plus the wire transfer fee's and taxes when it lands.

  On 19/11/2011 at 9:59 AM, GTR_JOEY said:

Maybe talk to gcg,

Remember mate, on top of the twin scroll ull need to buy two waste gates, I got 2

Tial ones from full race for 500..

And setting the plumbing up on a twin scroll is goin to be pricey as well...

Other things to note with the twin scroll from full race is that ur

power steering reservoir will need locating

I personally had to chop a bit of reinforcement out of my bonnet cause the turbo sat high (not sure if that's due to the turbo or manifold, or both)

My a/c compressor no longer fits as it fouls on the manifold

And if u plan on running twin afm with a greddy "Y" pipe u will probably have to remove ur window washer bottles to fit ur intake

I found the same, the turbo sits higher than the motor - something anyone with an rb30 in a gtr would need to keep in mind.

so would the gt35r TS 1.06 rear be quicker/same/slower spool time to regular gt35r SS? maby the precision turbo 6262 with the T4 .84 is the better option then? its $999 plus $600 for ball bearing..

the problem is garrett dont make a 1.06 TS housing, the ATP housing is the only option and as DCIEVE said its not the greatest quality housing or easiest to work on. i have one on a hks cast manifold and to seperate the turbo from the manifold i have to remove the manifold and turbo from the motor, take the compressor housing off (which is missing 1 bolt where it fouls on the ATP housing) and then attempt to undo the housing bolts....

Just to go back to the complexity issue, I think thats a very valid point and I think that this picture of my set-up confirms what sort of work you will need if you want to stay dedicated to the twin scroll and run twin wastegates. As I've said before I run the full Race set-up with the ATP made 1.06 Rear. The casting on my turbo was quite good compared to others, so they may have fixed issues that DCIEVE brought up earlier. I haven't checked lately if they use the new GTX3582R internals, but is worth looking into if you are going down that path.

IMG_1197.jpg

More pics in my thread. If you have any questions in regard to how the setup went feel free to ask.

what about one of the forced performance turbos,

modified garrett units, apparently work real well

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=FP&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

  On 21/11/2011 at 9:12 AM, fomby639 said:

is the garrett turbo good enough for it to be worth it? dont mind if its a pain in the ass to fit, aslong as its going to give me the best results.

There is a back to back test betwen the 1.06 t4 ts reared gt35 and bw s300sx 83-75 on the evo forums with pretty much identical results. I'll dig it up.

  On 21/11/2011 at 10:34 AM, fomby639 said:

they do look pretty good, do they make there own TS rears? noticed on the FP HTA GT3582R it has a 1.00 T4 divied rear, would it be the same as the ATP?

I have a HTA3586 from FP and it runs a T4 TS 1.00 marked with Garrett. Pretty sure the ATP one is 1.06. My garret one looks like a normal Garrett housing with no problems..

AFAIK Garrett have never made a twin scroll turbine housing for the GT35 turbine in a small frame turbo - which is what a GT3582R is .

I think you'd be better off with a GT4088R or even a T04Z because at least you can get propper TS T4 flanged housings made for their turbines . Plus they both use the larger frame and ball bearing center section . Jeez even a BB T04 60-1 is at least correct housings for its wheels even if the wheels are long in the tooth .

Twin ext gate twin scroll is fabbed semi race car stuff that most will never use , TS IW is the only practical hope because its the easiest and cheapest method for the end user to apply . It works but only economies of scale through a big manufacturer using it as OE could make it happen .

A .

Check out the new Turbonetics GTK series... available in twin scroll housing.

http://turboneticsinc.com/turbochargers/gt-k-turbochargers-hpc-billet-compressor-wheels

Does anyone know if Turbonetics design all their own components i.e. wheels, housings, etc.

think im going to go with the FP HTA GT3582R Ball Bearing with the 1.00 t4 TS rear, with the billet fron wheel and extented front blades, i think it will be the most responsive setup i can go. ive already ordered a 6boost manifold with one gate port, think for my setup the extra money for the twin gate setup can be better spent else where.

  On 22/11/2011 at 1:55 AM, Ryan1200 said:

I have a HTA3586 from FP and it runs a T4 TS 1.00 marked with Garrett. Pretty sure the ATP one is 1.06. My garret one looks like a normal Garrett housing with no problems..

how responsive is the 3586?

  On 22/11/2011 at 5:44 AM, fomby639 said:

think im going to go with the FP HTA GT3582R Ball Bearing with the 1.00 t4 TS rear, with the billet fron wheel and extented front blades, i think it will be the most responsive setup i can go. ive already ordered a 6boost manifold with one gate port, think for my setup the extra money for the twin gate setup can be better spent else where.

how responsive is the 3586?

Turbos going on a FJ20 1600 so no RB data sorry..

  • 1 month later...

R33 RB25DET series 2

550cc Deatschwerks injectors.

Bosch 984 Fuel Pump

Z32 AFM

Plazmaman FMIC

GT3076 ATP 0.82 Twinscroll

HKS Cast Manifold Extrude Honed, 50mm HKS Ext Gate

3inch straight through exhaust mid + rear oval mufflers

Venom 100cell Cat

Tuned on Shell V-power 98ron

Boost 22.5psi 4100rpm dropping to 19.5psi 6400rpm

Profec B II

PowerFC

UnigroupDyno123122011_0000-1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
    • It sounds farrrrrrr too cold at your place Duncan... Here I was thinking our 10 degrees overnight is getting cold...
    • oh yeah, reminded this morning....bin lids frozen shut too
    • In my case not, because of total reno. But yeah.
    • Did you use an electronic speedo drive? Does you speedometer read all the way to 180km?
×
×
  • Create New...