Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Without back to backing with an open 0.82 housing it is hard to tell.

On the road it drives nicely, it makes boost much earlier on the road than the dyno. I am not sure it is down on power. It is +/-10kw to most other results (excluding the outlying results from special dyno's)

Yavus felt there was an exhaust restriction based on the rate of climb and the taper at the top end. I am not so sure, it could be the old external gate (pretty sure it runs a 7-8psi spring) it could be the turbine housing maxing out. A 1 bar spring would make life easier for the boost controller. Anyone know where to get one for an old school HKS gate?

Ultimately it makes power around where it should, 200rwkw at 4100rpm isn't shabby on this dyno. I can reinstall the de-cat but 10kw or so extra top end is useless to me (assuming it is even an issue).

We could have played silly buggers and brought it all on much earlier for dick schwinging reasons but this is consistent with other Unigroup sheets.

the atp housing would probably be becoming a decent restriction at that power level, hence the top end. you could probably squeeze a decent amount more out of it with big boost though.

i have the same gate and found a mob that manafacturers copies and springs to suit a while ago but lost all the details when my hard drive died unfortunately. they are out there though, just gotta find them.

  • 2 months later...

Without back to backing with an open 0.82 housing it is hard to tell.

On the road it drives nicely, it makes boost much earlier on the road than the dyno. I am not sure it is down on power. It is +/-10kw to most other results (excluding the outlying results from special dyno's)

Yavus felt there was an exhaust restriction based on the rate of climb and the taper at the top end. I am not so sure, it could be the old external gate (pretty sure it runs a 7-8psi spring) it could be the turbine housing maxing out. A 1 bar spring would make life easier for the boost controller. Anyone know where to get one for an old school HKS gate?

Ultimately it makes power around where it should, 200rwkw at 4100rpm isn't shabby on this dyno. I can reinstall the de-cat but 10kw or so extra top end is useless to me (assuming it is even an issue).

We could have played silly buggers and brought it all on much earlier for dick schwinging reasons but this is consistent with other Unigroup sheets.

Any update on this mate?

did u sort out a new spring/exhaust restrictions and been back for a new reading?

Should make a different assume the split is from the manifold to the wheel tip of the turbo. It also makes the a/r slightly smaller then what it is depending on the thickness of the divider.

yer the a/r stays the same but the with the same a/r housing in both open and divided the divided will lose a small amount of gas area due to the divider, but this is more than made up for by the increased efficiency of the divided pulses

  • 1 year later...

Well after years of having sub-standard options for going twin scroll on Garrett turbos we can now get genuine Garrett VBand Housings in open or twin scroll... will be interesting to see how these perform!

post-11136-0-39728500-1366684260_thumb.jpg

Dafarq. I was half expecting to see a fleshlight when the email notification came through :P

Hahahaha yeah it was a bit random but the inlet looks like a piggy!

They should be a good thing though hopefully!

Well after years of having sub-standard options for going twin scroll on Garrett turbos we can now get genuine Garrett VBand Housings in open or twin scroll... will be interesting to see how these perform!

attachicon.gifGarrett Divided.jpg

Ahhh nice find Lithmeister! Where did you find this gem?... they had their rapid prototyped stuff at SEMA a while back, looks like they have come through with goods.

I'm well connected, and always have my ear to the ground.

(aka, I follow Turbo By Garrett on Facebook and they posted an update which I spotted while slacking off :P )

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152761602720103&set=a.10150407102375103.644054.46944410102&type=1&theater

I'm well connected, and always have my ear to the ground.

(aka, I follow Turbo By Garrett on Facebook and they posted an update which I spotted while slacking off :P )

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152761602720103&set=a.10150407102375103.644054.46944410102&type=1&theater

Liked! :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...