Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay we need to get this thread back on track,,,so here's another vid

http://www.youtube.com/user/RadicalRacer41...l/2/f__DOB0XYMg

Eastern Creek

Pov 1

Lap times were rubbish,,,Duncan and I put 2nd hand engine in,,,so pussy footed all day and had major electrical problems,,,ran on battery power all day.

Neil.

Big ups to Neil for putting the camera in my car at our last sau day at OP GP

Not a problem Evil,,,pity I didn't straighten the camera properly. I have more vids for you. I'll bring them on one of those little usb plug in gizmo's to the trackday if I don't see you beforehand.

Neil.

Here you go 1.15.88 OP GP Sept 2009 Supersprint

R33 Road Rego'd

Yes I know about the sound issues enjoy

Great vids Stuart. That i-race stuff is a bit crazy. And the 15.x at OPGP was great, nice work mate.

good driving dave....its bloody hard work getting past a car that's quicker in a straight line. good save on lap 6 as well

stu that irace had a hell of a variation in speeds...and did that ute clip you or was that just the ripple strip? he really should never have turned in there

Cool vids as usual Ash,,,the reverse grid one in the rain was most entertaining.

I put my pov1 in Rod Marklands HR31 at the muscle car masters. His starting is really bad because his launch handbrake wasn't releasing properly.

Neil.

Nice video Neil.

That engine sounds awesome! what is it a RB20?

Looks a bit laggy? Once he nails the start and sorts the powerdown coming onto the straight it will be really quick.

Ash

sure is...that's Markland's Gibson R31 Group A car...outrageous in a straight line against the group C "big banger" v8s isn't it....just 2l pushing it along.

good driving dave....its bloody hard work getting past a car that's quicker in a straight line. good save on lap 6 as well

stu that irace had a hell of a variation in speeds...and did that ute clip you or was that just the ripple strip? he really should never have turned in there

Yep different - cant blame the ute for not using his mirror - he didnt have one, check out right d/s - I faired better than someone else - did just touch bar - scratch only, but yep, spot on, did have to jump ripple strip as well. I was a bit keen, had the same drama's passing it earlier in the same race (12 lapper).

Didn't matter - reverse grid with 50 second penalty, won race on last corner!!

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...