Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mate could you pm me details of this product for the r32 gtr (track version) or anything. please include hor much negative camber would i be able to achieve. i pm'ed you but no reply. i m really interested!

mate could you pm me details of this product for the r32 gtr (track version) or anything. please include hor much negative camber would i be able to achieve. i pm'ed you but no reply. i m really interested!

  • 2 weeks later...
yes agreed i pm,d a while back and no reply also.

sorry guys for some reason i can only do one pm every ten minutes( and work doesnt like me doing it ... funny that)

im over at uniques today and will find out a confirmed time frame

if you need any pressing info.. give me a bell

ill get johnny to come on here and confirm when they will be ready for delivery!

i have i think 7 confirmed deposits

ill update the list this weekend so every one knowes that they are on the list

pete

0448468884

Hi gang, sorry for not keeping an eye on this, and yes Pete gave me a shove. Anyway we are getting two version made, one for road- track cars and another for race cars, from memory option for 10mm longer and 20mm shorter, and standard length to 30 mm shorter for race cars. Also there has been a slight improvement and change in fixing the main body, now using a cotter pin, which is getting made. No extra cost. They are delayed, yes, and still a few weeks away. I will update with pics and or info.

If you get road - track version you can always cut it shorter if needing more neg camber, if turns into a race car only. I have the shorter prototype on my Zed race car, and can go up to 5 degree neg. I have used with no issues for about 3 years, suspension works better as does not bind, steering is lighter and has more feel, and it does not wear out.

Re camber, the road- track version should range from about .5 degree neg to 3 deg max, and race from about 1.5 deg neg to 4.5 deg neg. These are estimates as depends on height of the car, and if has stock length lower control arm and inner pivot point is stock, or moved outwards, as some race cars do this mod, in which case you can probably go up to 6 degrees neg.

SOunds good

Thanks for the update.

I am keen on getting at least one race version, possibly 2

I will keep an eye on this thred as much as i can but It would be awsome to recieve a pm for when we are closer to a point of ordering for these, for which i will happily deposit money straight in

Cheers

Tim,

sorry for the noob question, do these use bearings?

What are the lifespan of these? Need any maintenance or set it and forget it?

Is the group buy price still available? Interested in a road pair

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...