Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Jake: From that list you would be mad to go past a Falcon. The wagon's have a better rear end and don't suffer the same camber issues as commos and the boxes don't suffer from the same heat issues as commos (but they do have issues - read on) A cheap trans cooler is still a good thing as BA/BFs are still known to have issues with coolant and trans fluid mixing and ruining the box A trans cooler allows you to bypass the problem area like I did (PWR kit was 165). In the BA this is because the trans cooler piping runs through the radiator and in the BF they moved that out to a heat exchanger on the side of the block but it still has the potential to leak and mix the fluids. If you wound up with a 6spd BF you would have a hefty repair bill, the rule of thumb seems to be to treat the heat exchanger like a service item and replace it at set intervals, they're only 120 or so.

Fords will be cheaper per year model so you will get a newer Falcon vs Commos for the same dollar value, they make a great daily and drive comfortably with plenty of space (I had a BA 4spd, towed the Sil with it, and now have a BF 6spd, yet to tow but much nicer box). Both cars can get good fuel consumption if driven respectfully and the Falcon makes more torque lower in the rev range which is ideal for towing. If you do a lot of towing you might also want to consider better pads as the BA/BFs can be hard on pads rotors (I have not had this issue as I drive like a Nanna but I've heard about it plenty).

I was a Holden man, and still am for V8s, but when it comes to 6cyl cars I am thoroughly converted to Falcons for daily/tow duties.

I found that mine used quite a bit of fuel when towing if I followed the handbook and towed in 3rd, with a trans cooler you can comfortably tow in 4th at 110 and the fuel econ was heaps better then, around 12L/100 on the hume which is nice and flat mostly. (Silvia plus tools, fuel).

You guys are expecting to pickup decent BAs for 5K... Like... Seriously?

Plus, if you want to tow, spend the extra coin in the BA/BF range and get the turbo model. Shit loads more torque and they're effortless to drive.

I'm yet to throw a trailer on the back of my FG XR6T, but it will happen very soon.

Around town it's great too... Plenty of poke for some mild fun on daily trips, and purely in the city on stop start, I've so far seen the worst of 14L/100KM, on the hume with no trailer on it's in the single digits.

I did Wollongong to Goulburn to Wollongong, and then 200odd KM of city driving in stop start and primarily on the cold fuel map, and it still averaged 10L/100KM...

Did I mention mid 13second quarters out of the box?

This took 45 seconds to find. I imagine eBay and Gumtree would have better deals?

http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/ford-falcon-2003-11879821?cr=2&eapi=2&Range=Price:Min,5000~1|Mileage:Min,200000|Year:2002,Max|Seats:Min,Max|EngineSize:Min,Max&silo=Stock&sort=~Price&VNAV=A&__N=1216%201246%201247%201252%201282%204294966463%204294966285%204294966274&vertical=Car&distance=25

Might seem like high ks but I would hazard a guess and say you would not get an early VY/late model VX (same year model as the falcon) with under 200ks for 4k... and that's before bargaining.

XR6T has sheeeet loads of torque but you will be paying more than a few grand extra to get it, plus it needs premium fuel, higher service costs etc. Not necessarily what you want in a daily when you already have a turbo car to play with.

If 5K is the absolute limit you wont get an xr6t, and if you can stretch another K or so then you will get a much better NA BA and you'd stll be a couple k away from even the oldest clapped out xr6t's.

Edited by ActionDan

Well I ended buying a 08 model turbo diesel duel cab 4x2 hilux sr. haven't used out for towing yet but it send to have mountains of torque. Down the track ill prob get a chip for it then exhaust for a little extra poke again

Have towed an R34 GTR to Wakefield with one of these, and it tows it really well. Turbo Diesel all the way. I use an 80 series, but its petrol chews fuel but tows fine, but surprisingly the Hilux 2wd TD tows the car with less effort, but the cruiser is more stable being heavier.

You guys are expecting to pickup decent BAs for 5K... Like... Seriously?

Plus, if you want to tow, spend the extra coin in the BA/BF range and get the turbo model. Shit loads more torque and they're effortless to drive.

there are a couple under the $5k mark yes

and no im not as rich as some people so i cant afford a xr6t :huh:

For the price and ease of installation trans cooler is a good thing, Jake you're handy with a spanner so you would have no trouble installing one, I did my PWR kit (165 eBay) by myself no hassles and I'm an IT Bum.

Edited by ActionDan

I didn't really like the idea of towing with a XR6 turbo so thats why I went with the V8, I would think the turbo would be under a fair bit of load and spooling all the time while towing...

yeah ive heard from a few people that the xr6t's sit on boost most of the time while towing heavy loads

but thats what ive heard anyways

Have towed an R34 GTR to Wakefield with one of these, and it tows it really well. Turbo Diesel all the way. I use an 80 series, but its petrol chews fuel but tows fine, but surprisingly the Hilux 2wd TD tows the car with less effort, but the cruiser is more stable being heavier.

thats good to know. yeah a heavier base car would make for a more stable arrangement.. i plan on using stabiliers bars etc and my trailer is pretty decked out so hoping it will be ok.

how was the turbi diesel on fuel for towing may i ask?

This took 45 seconds to find. I imagine eBay and Gumtree would have better deals?

http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/ford-falcon-2003-11879821?cr=2&eapi=2&Range=Price:Min,5000~1|Mileage:Min,200000|Year:2002,Max|Seats:Min,Max|EngineSize:Min,Max&silo=Stock&sort=~Price&VNAV=A&__N=1216%201246%201247%201252%201282%204294966463%204294966285%204294966274&vertical=Car&distance=25

Might seem like high ks but I would hazard a guess and say you would not get an early VY/late model VX (same year model as the falcon) with under 200ks for 4k... and that's before bargaining.

XR6T has sheeeet loads of torque but you will be paying more than a few grand extra to get it, plus it needs premium fuel, higher service costs etc. Not necessarily what you want in a daily when you already have a turbo car to play with.

If 5K is the absolute limit you wont get an xr6t, and if you can stretch another K or so then you will get a much better NA BA and you'd stll be a couple k away from even the oldest clapped out xr6t's.

For some reason my mind was just sitting there going "NO WAY! You won't get a BA for that cash..." But it had the XR6 filter turned on... LOL

My Bad.

I didn't really like the idea of towing with a XR6 turbo so thats why I went with the V8, I would think the turbo would be under a fair bit of load and spooling all the time while towing...

shouldn't be a problem for the turbo. turbo diesels sit on boost constantly on the highway even when not towing. turbos last alright there... Mine sits on a constant 4psi at 100-110kph just cruising by itself. And did 4500km over 2 weeks earlier in the year towing the camper trailer and all loaded up sitting on a constant 10psi @ 110kph for most of that. And modern turbo diesels run alot more boost than that. I wouldn't worry about the turbo.

But I'll never be a fan of towing with passenger vehicles. Monocoque construction is crap to tow with compared to a ladder chassis 4WD. You can feel the trailer pulling the car around all over the place, whereas you don't feel a thing with 4WDs. Its about the mass of the vehicle and the strength of the chassis. So while falcon may pull it OK, I always think a 4WD is always going to be the better tow vehicle.

I'd agree with that, 4wd ladder chassis will retain more of its original driving characteristics when towing, But a Falcon is heavy enough to withstand the movements of a reasonable load, they are over 1700kg after all, and will be a much nicer daily which is what it will be doing 95% of the time in Jake's case and in Kieran's (OP).

I'd hazard a 5K BA would also be a much nicer car to live with than a 5K GQ (can't imagine anyone finding a GU for that money?).

Edited by ActionDan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...