Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fuel costs is a big issue IMO.

at the end of the day it all adds up. not all of us have endless cash to play with to be able to use luxury 4wd's as tow cars and not worry about how much fuel your v10 twin turbo is going to use going from perth to qld... I know for me i have to budget carefully for every aspect of an interstate trip.

My point is when it comes to towing my GTR around I'm more worried about the cost to run it for the event than the fuel to get there.

Anyone that knows my GTR will know it's cost way too much over the years! It typically goes from home to the event to the mechanic!!

And yes, I suppose if I had to travel from Perth to QLD, regularly, then fuel consumption could be an issue. Anywhere up and down the East Coast is never more than around 1000kms, which at even 5L/100kms worse than other tow cars, several times a year, is nothing more than about $150 extra for the trip. Add that $150 to the $5000 or so the trip is probably costing you with accom/entrance fees/tyres/etc etc and it's not really that much of an increase in the budget.

My point is when it comes to towing my GTR around I'm more worried about the cost to run it for the event than the fuel to get there.

Anyone that knows my GTR will know it's cost way too much over the years! It typically goes from home to the event to the mechanic!!

And yes, I suppose if I had to travel from Perth to QLD, regularly, then fuel consumption could be an issue. Anywhere up and down the East Coast is never more than around 1000kms, which at even 5L/100kms worse than other tow cars, several times a year, is nothing more than about $150 extra for the trip. Add that $150 to the $5000 or so the trip is probably costing you with accom/entrance fees/tyres/etc etc and it's not really that much of an increase in the budget.

50L extra per 1000KM done five times a year at $1.55 per litre is nearly a 10% increase in costs... And that doesn't worry you?

I think by changing tow cars and getting heaps better economy and saving so much is a good thing!

Fatz is right, the most annoying thing for me is having to fill up too often when touring. A smallish tank, coupled with a pessemistic distance to empty trip computer, sees me pulling over every few hundred kays.

And I'm wuith Brighty, that no, 10% extra doesn't worry me. What price do you put on having something that's actually nice to sit for hours on end, nice to drive, and a great performing and pleasurable daily? 10% of the fuel cost for an occasional interstate towing trip? Yep, for sure!

TBH, a MUCH bigger issue is fringe benefits tax if using a non commercial vehicle.

Fatz is right, the most annoying thing for me is having to fill up too often when touring. A smallish tank, coupled with a pessemistic distance to empty trip computer, sees me pulling over every few hundred kays.

And I'm wuith Brighty, that no, 10% extra doesn't worry me. What price do you put on having something that's actually nice to sit for hours on end, nice to drive, and a great performing and pleasurable daily? 10% of the fuel cost for an occasional interstate towing trip? Yep, for sure!

TBH, a MUCH bigger issue is fringe benefits tax if using a non commercial vehicle.

If it's a private car, towing for private stuff, there are no fringe benefits... Hence no FBT to worry about...

Edit: And I choose the economical tow vehicle that's comfy to sit in and a performer and pleasurable daily...

Hence, that 10% saving is lots to me!

Sorry, I was referring more to those user-chooser business types. The FBT I pay by choosing a 4WD wagon is unfortunately several thousands of dollars per year, but, it's a price I've so far been happy to pay rather than be forced to drive a ute of sorts.

good tow cars... people with Falcons, go out and try an emergency brake from 110kph with 2000kg behind you. If you're game... how about in the wet? or downhill. how long do your brakes hold up going down a range? etc. They might be cheap to buy. 2008 onwards models might be uber cheap on fuel (at least when not towing). They might be comfy to drive everyday, but none of those things makes them good tow cars.

Not sure how up to date this info is from a caravanning site (but I found a similar thing on Ausfish posted this year), but its a good example of just how good passenger vehicles are for towing:

"Ford only permits 100km/h if the load is less than 1200 kg. At 1600 kg this drops to 90km/h. The speed further reduces until at 2300 kg, 80km/h is the maximum. Holden takes a similar approach but also ties the vehicle speed to the type of towing equipment fitted. Spending a few minutes reading the trailer towing section in the owners manual is highly recommended."

Edited by hrd-hr30

In regards to braking simple answer is trailer brakes and no not the cable type but set up properly with electric brakes. you would most likely see the same result with 1800kg of falcon and 2000kg or more towing weight slamming on the brakes at 100klm/h on a wet road as you would towing with a 4wd towing the same load.

That is why you drive to the conditions.

good tow cars... people with Falcons, go out and try an emergency brake from 110kph with 2000kg behind you. If you're game... how about in the wet? or downhill. how long do your brakes hold up going down a range? etc. They might be cheap to buy. 2008 onwards models might be uber cheap on fuel (at least when not towing). They might be comfy to drive everyday, but none of those things makes them good tow cars.

Not sure how up to date this info is from a caravanning site (but I found a similar thing on Ausfish posted this year), but its a good example of just how good passenger vehicles are for towing:

"Ford only permits 100km/h if the load is less than 1200 kg. At 1600 kg this drops to 90km/h. The speed further reduces until at 2300 kg, 80km/h is the maximum. Holden takes a similar approach but also ties the vehicle speed to the type of towing equipment fitted. Spending a few minutes reading the trailer towing section in the owners manual is highly recommended."

as i said in an ealier post, if someone is only going to tow a few times a year then they are best of with a car that suits them for the 99% rather than the 1%. a falcon with stop more safely in the wet when not towing than a 4wd, is less likely to roll, etc, so if towing is a rarity then they would be better off with something more suited to daily driving.

In regards to braking simple answer is trailer brakes and no not the cable type but set up properly with electric brakes. you would most likely see the same result with 1800kg of falcon and 2000kg or more towing weight slamming on the brakes at 100klm/h on a wet road as you would towing with a 4wd towing the same load.

That is why you drive to the conditions.

don't agree.

1. most heavy duty ladder chassis 4WDs have load sensing brake proportioning valves which change braking bias with rear axle load. That means less deterioration of their normal braking performance compared to the passenger car.

2. And an extra 30% or more mass in front of the trailer - eg my GQ weighs 2350kg. They only get heavier as you get more modern and comfortable. So their naturally less affected by the load behind them.

3. And the ladder chassis that carries and distributes the forces of the trailer more effectively. Hence the 3500kg towing capacity, which is over 50% more than the Falcon's. With none of the caveats. There's alot more capability in reserve with a 4WD than something that's rated to more than 1600kg only with load stabilisers at a max ~80km/h. ie the 4WDs braking and handling will not be as adversely affected as the passenger cars' will be with a heavy load behind it.

4. Anyone who thinks 4WDs are as affected by the wet as a passenger car simply hasn't driven one in those conditions. Standing water on the highway no longer pulls your car around with ATs or MTs. HTs I can't speak for because I've never used them, but the fact they're turning so much slower than a tiny passenger car tyre gives them far more time to clear water. That mean less deterioration of their normal grip levels. And more stability.

Driving to the conditions? If your Falcon is rated to tow at 80km/h max (ie in good conditions), what do you do when conditions deteriorate? 60km/h? 70 maybe? You'd be a hazard to everyone else on the highway!

I can't cop the argument that 4WDs won't be better tow vehicles than passenger cars.

as i said in an ealier post, if someone is only going to tow a few times a year then they are best of with a car that suits them for the 99% rather than the 1%. a falcon with stop more safely in the wet when not towing than a 4wd, is less likely to roll, etc, so if towing is a rarity then they would be better off with something more suited to daily driving.

+1 Well said, totally agree.

don't agree.

1. most heavy duty ladder chassis 4WDs have load sensing brake proportioning valves which change braking bias with rear axle load. That means less deterioration of their normal braking performance compared to the passenger car.

2. And an extra 30% or more mass in front of the trailer - eg my GQ weighs 2350kg. They only get heavier as you get more modern and comfortable. So their naturally less affected by the load behind them.

3. And the ladder chassis that carries and distributes the forces of the trailer more effectively. Hence the 3500kg towing capacity, which is over 50% more than the Falcon's. With none of the caveats. There's alot more capability in reserve with a 4WD than something that's rated to more than 1600kg only with load stabilisers at a max ~80km/h. ie the 4WDs braking and handling will not be as adversely affected as the passenger cars' will be with a heavy load behind it.

4. Anyone who thinks 4WDs are as affected by the wet as a passenger car simply hasn't driven one in those conditions. Standing water on the highway no longer pulls your car around with ATs or MTs. HTs I can't speak for because I've never used them, but the fact they're turning so much slower than a tiny passenger car tyre gives them far more time to clear water. That mean less deterioration of their normal grip levels. And more stability.

Driving to the conditions? If your Falcon is rated to tow at 80km/h max (ie in good conditions), what do you do when conditions deteriorate? 60km/h? 70 maybe? You'd be a hazard to everyone else on the highway!

I can't cop the argument that 4WDs won't be better tow vehicles than passenger cars.

Considering we could pull my dads VT s commodore to a stop quicker with the caravan and all shit in it weighing 1800KG then what we could my uncles 100series cruiser.

Oh an that's in an emergency style braking...

Second to that, if you're really going to argue all the shot you are, you should be selling your 4WD for a truck.

A properly setup trailer on the back of a car will stop as quick, if not quicker then a 4WD.

The electric systems we run in our cars and trucks for towing my dads trailers you can actually feel the trailer pulling up the car and truck more then the car/trucks brakes do. (just so you know, the family company runs 2 trucks towing around 3 tonne each day, plus upto 3 tonne on the back, and dad had two large caravans he towed on the back of an S commodore... He noted no difference in towing usig a 2010 hilux. He's now sold the smallest caravan...)

An improperly setup one will jack knife and roll both.

And isn't it funny, out of all the times I've driven the F3 freeway when people have lost car trailers and caravans, its been in the ratio of 4 4WD (patrols and cruisers not soft roaders) to every one commodore or falcon...

And seeing as more people seem to toe with commodores an falcons, they must be better... ... ...

I've had my 2003 3L TD Navara for 6 months now, still living the dream, tow my 33 about once a month. Doesn't use much juice as long as I'm not in a hurry :) It's my daily too, get around 750kms from a tank, mostly because I drive like an old man though.

I towed 6 times last year, and will tow less than that this year.

Can I use the Q7 for MRA Fatz seeings you arent going? lol

yea.... na

i tow things every weekend

trailer is almost permanatly attached lugging shit

poeple who tow shit 6 times a year should be banned from this thread!

http://www.carsales.com.au/dealer/details/porsche-cayenne-2004-11515394?cr=0&distance=25&vertical=Car&eapi=2&page=1&sort=~Price&__N=1216 1247 1252 1282 4294963765 4294963552&silo=Stock&Range=Price:Min,Max~1

how would they compare to the Q7

Very similar underpinnings, fractionally shorter wheelbase.

Obviously that era is all petrol V8's, and will use more full than a diesel version which uses the VW/Audi engine.

Very similar underpinnings, fractionally shorter wheelbase.

Obviously that era is all petrol V8's, and will use more full than a diesel version which uses the VW/Audi engine.

I think you'll find also that the Q7 has about 250nm more to play with also...

Most Cayennes I looked at before settling on the R50 had only 500nm (approx).

You need more than 500nm to tow 3t effectively IMO

Fatz, doesn't the Q7 have about 750nm ?? (I looked at them also, but I don't care for soccer mums as I'm happily married) wacko.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...