Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fuel costs is a big issue IMO.

at the end of the day it all adds up. not all of us have endless cash to play with to be able to use luxury 4wd's as tow cars and not worry about how much fuel your v10 twin turbo is going to use going from perth to qld... I know for me i have to budget carefully for every aspect of an interstate trip.

My point is when it comes to towing my GTR around I'm more worried about the cost to run it for the event than the fuel to get there.

Anyone that knows my GTR will know it's cost way too much over the years! It typically goes from home to the event to the mechanic!!

And yes, I suppose if I had to travel from Perth to QLD, regularly, then fuel consumption could be an issue. Anywhere up and down the East Coast is never more than around 1000kms, which at even 5L/100kms worse than other tow cars, several times a year, is nothing more than about $150 extra for the trip. Add that $150 to the $5000 or so the trip is probably costing you with accom/entrance fees/tyres/etc etc and it's not really that much of an increase in the budget.

My point is when it comes to towing my GTR around I'm more worried about the cost to run it for the event than the fuel to get there.

Anyone that knows my GTR will know it's cost way too much over the years! It typically goes from home to the event to the mechanic!!

And yes, I suppose if I had to travel from Perth to QLD, regularly, then fuel consumption could be an issue. Anywhere up and down the East Coast is never more than around 1000kms, which at even 5L/100kms worse than other tow cars, several times a year, is nothing more than about $150 extra for the trip. Add that $150 to the $5000 or so the trip is probably costing you with accom/entrance fees/tyres/etc etc and it's not really that much of an increase in the budget.

50L extra per 1000KM done five times a year at $1.55 per litre is nearly a 10% increase in costs... And that doesn't worry you?

I think by changing tow cars and getting heaps better economy and saving so much is a good thing!

Fatz is right, the most annoying thing for me is having to fill up too often when touring. A smallish tank, coupled with a pessemistic distance to empty trip computer, sees me pulling over every few hundred kays.

And I'm wuith Brighty, that no, 10% extra doesn't worry me. What price do you put on having something that's actually nice to sit for hours on end, nice to drive, and a great performing and pleasurable daily? 10% of the fuel cost for an occasional interstate towing trip? Yep, for sure!

TBH, a MUCH bigger issue is fringe benefits tax if using a non commercial vehicle.

Fatz is right, the most annoying thing for me is having to fill up too often when touring. A smallish tank, coupled with a pessemistic distance to empty trip computer, sees me pulling over every few hundred kays.

And I'm wuith Brighty, that no, 10% extra doesn't worry me. What price do you put on having something that's actually nice to sit for hours on end, nice to drive, and a great performing and pleasurable daily? 10% of the fuel cost for an occasional interstate towing trip? Yep, for sure!

TBH, a MUCH bigger issue is fringe benefits tax if using a non commercial vehicle.

If it's a private car, towing for private stuff, there are no fringe benefits... Hence no FBT to worry about...

Edit: And I choose the economical tow vehicle that's comfy to sit in and a performer and pleasurable daily...

Hence, that 10% saving is lots to me!

Sorry, I was referring more to those user-chooser business types. The FBT I pay by choosing a 4WD wagon is unfortunately several thousands of dollars per year, but, it's a price I've so far been happy to pay rather than be forced to drive a ute of sorts.

good tow cars... people with Falcons, go out and try an emergency brake from 110kph with 2000kg behind you. If you're game... how about in the wet? or downhill. how long do your brakes hold up going down a range? etc. They might be cheap to buy. 2008 onwards models might be uber cheap on fuel (at least when not towing). They might be comfy to drive everyday, but none of those things makes them good tow cars.

Not sure how up to date this info is from a caravanning site (but I found a similar thing on Ausfish posted this year), but its a good example of just how good passenger vehicles are for towing:

"Ford only permits 100km/h if the load is less than 1200 kg. At 1600 kg this drops to 90km/h. The speed further reduces until at 2300 kg, 80km/h is the maximum. Holden takes a similar approach but also ties the vehicle speed to the type of towing equipment fitted. Spending a few minutes reading the trailer towing section in the owners manual is highly recommended."

Edited by hrd-hr30

In regards to braking simple answer is trailer brakes and no not the cable type but set up properly with electric brakes. you would most likely see the same result with 1800kg of falcon and 2000kg or more towing weight slamming on the brakes at 100klm/h on a wet road as you would towing with a 4wd towing the same load.

That is why you drive to the conditions.

good tow cars... people with Falcons, go out and try an emergency brake from 110kph with 2000kg behind you. If you're game... how about in the wet? or downhill. how long do your brakes hold up going down a range? etc. They might be cheap to buy. 2008 onwards models might be uber cheap on fuel (at least when not towing). They might be comfy to drive everyday, but none of those things makes them good tow cars.

Not sure how up to date this info is from a caravanning site (but I found a similar thing on Ausfish posted this year), but its a good example of just how good passenger vehicles are for towing:

"Ford only permits 100km/h if the load is less than 1200 kg. At 1600 kg this drops to 90km/h. The speed further reduces until at 2300 kg, 80km/h is the maximum. Holden takes a similar approach but also ties the vehicle speed to the type of towing equipment fitted. Spending a few minutes reading the trailer towing section in the owners manual is highly recommended."

as i said in an ealier post, if someone is only going to tow a few times a year then they are best of with a car that suits them for the 99% rather than the 1%. a falcon with stop more safely in the wet when not towing than a 4wd, is less likely to roll, etc, so if towing is a rarity then they would be better off with something more suited to daily driving.

In regards to braking simple answer is trailer brakes and no not the cable type but set up properly with electric brakes. you would most likely see the same result with 1800kg of falcon and 2000kg or more towing weight slamming on the brakes at 100klm/h on a wet road as you would towing with a 4wd towing the same load.

That is why you drive to the conditions.

don't agree.

1. most heavy duty ladder chassis 4WDs have load sensing brake proportioning valves which change braking bias with rear axle load. That means less deterioration of their normal braking performance compared to the passenger car.

2. And an extra 30% or more mass in front of the trailer - eg my GQ weighs 2350kg. They only get heavier as you get more modern and comfortable. So their naturally less affected by the load behind them.

3. And the ladder chassis that carries and distributes the forces of the trailer more effectively. Hence the 3500kg towing capacity, which is over 50% more than the Falcon's. With none of the caveats. There's alot more capability in reserve with a 4WD than something that's rated to more than 1600kg only with load stabilisers at a max ~80km/h. ie the 4WDs braking and handling will not be as adversely affected as the passenger cars' will be with a heavy load behind it.

4. Anyone who thinks 4WDs are as affected by the wet as a passenger car simply hasn't driven one in those conditions. Standing water on the highway no longer pulls your car around with ATs or MTs. HTs I can't speak for because I've never used them, but the fact they're turning so much slower than a tiny passenger car tyre gives them far more time to clear water. That mean less deterioration of their normal grip levels. And more stability.

Driving to the conditions? If your Falcon is rated to tow at 80km/h max (ie in good conditions), what do you do when conditions deteriorate? 60km/h? 70 maybe? You'd be a hazard to everyone else on the highway!

I can't cop the argument that 4WDs won't be better tow vehicles than passenger cars.

as i said in an ealier post, if someone is only going to tow a few times a year then they are best of with a car that suits them for the 99% rather than the 1%. a falcon with stop more safely in the wet when not towing than a 4wd, is less likely to roll, etc, so if towing is a rarity then they would be better off with something more suited to daily driving.

+1 Well said, totally agree.

don't agree.

1. most heavy duty ladder chassis 4WDs have load sensing brake proportioning valves which change braking bias with rear axle load. That means less deterioration of their normal braking performance compared to the passenger car.

2. And an extra 30% or more mass in front of the trailer - eg my GQ weighs 2350kg. They only get heavier as you get more modern and comfortable. So their naturally less affected by the load behind them.

3. And the ladder chassis that carries and distributes the forces of the trailer more effectively. Hence the 3500kg towing capacity, which is over 50% more than the Falcon's. With none of the caveats. There's alot more capability in reserve with a 4WD than something that's rated to more than 1600kg only with load stabilisers at a max ~80km/h. ie the 4WDs braking and handling will not be as adversely affected as the passenger cars' will be with a heavy load behind it.

4. Anyone who thinks 4WDs are as affected by the wet as a passenger car simply hasn't driven one in those conditions. Standing water on the highway no longer pulls your car around with ATs or MTs. HTs I can't speak for because I've never used them, but the fact they're turning so much slower than a tiny passenger car tyre gives them far more time to clear water. That mean less deterioration of their normal grip levels. And more stability.

Driving to the conditions? If your Falcon is rated to tow at 80km/h max (ie in good conditions), what do you do when conditions deteriorate? 60km/h? 70 maybe? You'd be a hazard to everyone else on the highway!

I can't cop the argument that 4WDs won't be better tow vehicles than passenger cars.

Considering we could pull my dads VT s commodore to a stop quicker with the caravan and all shit in it weighing 1800KG then what we could my uncles 100series cruiser.

Oh an that's in an emergency style braking...

Second to that, if you're really going to argue all the shot you are, you should be selling your 4WD for a truck.

A properly setup trailer on the back of a car will stop as quick, if not quicker then a 4WD.

The electric systems we run in our cars and trucks for towing my dads trailers you can actually feel the trailer pulling up the car and truck more then the car/trucks brakes do. (just so you know, the family company runs 2 trucks towing around 3 tonne each day, plus upto 3 tonne on the back, and dad had two large caravans he towed on the back of an S commodore... He noted no difference in towing usig a 2010 hilux. He's now sold the smallest caravan...)

An improperly setup one will jack knife and roll both.

And isn't it funny, out of all the times I've driven the F3 freeway when people have lost car trailers and caravans, its been in the ratio of 4 4WD (patrols and cruisers not soft roaders) to every one commodore or falcon...

And seeing as more people seem to toe with commodores an falcons, they must be better... ... ...

I've had my 2003 3L TD Navara for 6 months now, still living the dream, tow my 33 about once a month. Doesn't use much juice as long as I'm not in a hurry :) It's my daily too, get around 750kms from a tank, mostly because I drive like an old man though.

I towed 6 times last year, and will tow less than that this year.

Can I use the Q7 for MRA Fatz seeings you arent going? lol

yea.... na

i tow things every weekend

trailer is almost permanatly attached lugging shit

poeple who tow shit 6 times a year should be banned from this thread!

http://www.carsales.com.au/dealer/details/porsche-cayenne-2004-11515394?cr=0&distance=25&vertical=Car&eapi=2&page=1&sort=~Price&__N=1216 1247 1252 1282 4294963765 4294963552&silo=Stock&Range=Price:Min,Max~1

how would they compare to the Q7

Very similar underpinnings, fractionally shorter wheelbase.

Obviously that era is all petrol V8's, and will use more full than a diesel version which uses the VW/Audi engine.

Very similar underpinnings, fractionally shorter wheelbase.

Obviously that era is all petrol V8's, and will use more full than a diesel version which uses the VW/Audi engine.

I think you'll find also that the Q7 has about 250nm more to play with also...

Most Cayennes I looked at before settling on the R50 had only 500nm (approx).

You need more than 500nm to tow 3t effectively IMO

Fatz, doesn't the Q7 have about 750nm ?? (I looked at them also, but I don't care for soccer mums as I'm happily married) wacko.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...