Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

determining the difference between fake turbos using the same name . recently purchased a' kkrturbo off ... Pcpa in western aus. for nearly 200 less than what grant from otomoto was asking for it . has anyone else come across this ? ill be mighty depressed if i do have a fakie. means ill have to sell the rb30 det :P due to financial issues . if anyone can get back to me that'll be grand

www.pcpa.com.au

the model of turbo i apparently purshaced was kkr 560 help anyone !

Edited by butch
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273506-another-kkr-thread/
Share on other sites

i know a guy who buys KKR turbo's directly from factory in china and he says they are close to half the cost of what otomo charge for them here in australia.

so $200 cheaper will still mean they can make a profit on the turbo. I wouldnt worry about it

Yep looks like a copy to me.

Genuine: http://www.driftgarage.com.au/images/KKR330_sm.gif

Yours: http://www.pcpa.com.au/index.php?main_page...mage&pID=10

ID plate doesn't have any black KKR writing and the actuator is slightly different.

would anyone run this though ? even if its a copy . though it looks like the pcpa turbo has a benefit due to fact its water cooled as well .. but dunno - G

they all come out of the same factory in china anyway. just send it somewhere in AUS to get re-balanced and see how it goes.

not only shitty turbos, but fakes of a shitty turbo????

Yeah why copy KKR when you could copy HKS? GuiltToys explanation passes the common sense test. Its probably like the D2 G4 brake stuff. Manufacturing company makes it, sales/wholesaling companies badge it and sell it.

determining the difference between fake turbos using the same name . recently purchased a' kkrturbo off ... Pcpa in western aus. for nearly 200 less than what grant from otomoto was asking for it . has anyone else come across this ? ill be mighty depressed if i do have a fakie. means ill have to sell the rb30 det :) due to financial issues . if anyone can get back to me that'll be grand

www.pcpa.com.au

the model of turbo i apparently purshaced was kkr 560 help anyone !

Jesus Christ man !

Sell the RB30 due to financial crisis!

That's simply not an option mate.

If you're even close to the average ball park asshole, sell your body or soul first man..

genuine can only be bought from otomoto and their official kkr distributors.

ask for a refund dude

recieved an email back today . in regards to this turbo. refund is not an option . been doing some more research and this kkr 560 style turbo and the company that makes them is new power an offshoot company of kkr. still waiting on the reply from Pcpa into this matter heres there info if anyone wants a geeze into the dilemma

Ningbo Motor Industrial Co. Ltd

18 # Tian long shan Road,Beilun

Ningbo

Zhejiang

China 315806

Tel: (86 574) 86113256

Fax: (86 574) 86113257

Chat with supplier using:

Homepage Address

http://www.globalsources.com/turbocharger.co

Other Homepage Address

www.gpturbocharger.com

Key Contact:

Mr Chen, steven

Vice General manager

Auto parts & Auto accessories

Mr Chen, james

General manager

Auto parts & Auto accessories

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...