Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Try one of these

http://www.importmonster.com.au/view?url=h...title=2%205%205

Let me know if they any good lol

I think I will hold out for the ECU remap/tune

Does it come with a free Brocky Energy Polarizer???

:bunny:

I think the iphone app is right even though the computer says it's 7 km's per litre. Now assuming I've got this right on the manual figures of 150km's and consumed 31.79 litres then it's 21 ish per 100 k's! Fark!

Are you serious?

Some bugger has to be milking your tank!

I think the iphone app is right even though the computer says it's 7 km's per litre. Now assuming I've got this right on the manual figures of 150km's and consumed 31.79 litres then it's 21 ish per 100 k's! Fark!

Damn man! Are you using 91RON unleaded or the correct 98RON Premium?

Maybe you should try a different fuel?

I know when I have put Caltex Vortex98 in my tank, my exhaust coughed up puffs of carbon when ever I put my foot down, smelt of rotten egg all the time and I was getting 80km less from the tank on mostly freeway driving.

I generally use either BP ultimate, Mobil Synergy 8000 or Shell Vpower. None of which give me the any of the unpleasant effects outlined above.

BP ultimate, Mobil Synergy 8000 or Shell Vpower are the fuels to use

Id strongly suggest replace the oxygen sensor, reset battery/ecu, and then get it on the dyno with a reputable workshop to see why its chewing so much fuel.

Also bear in mind that not all models get the same economy.

An ARX will consume more petrol than a RS or RX. It is a heavier car and even the Factory quotes higher fuel usage.

This is true. I was assuming that my 14.5L/100km doing maximum 15 min trips (a good 3-5 mins of which is running cold) would be much worse than what would be considered average fuel consumption for a M35.

Either way, 21L/100km is far too high even for an ARX. The factory figures put it at only a couple L/100km higher than the RS/RX models dont they?

I'd check the O2 sensor first, then maybe look into tuning?

This is true. I was assuming that my 14.5L/100km doing maximum 15 min trips (a good 3-5 mins of which is running cold) would be much worse than what would be considered average fuel consumption for a M35.

Either way, 21L/100km is far too high even for an ARX. The factory figures put it at only a couple L/100km higher than the RS/RX models dont they?

I'd check the O2 sensor first, then maybe look into tuning?

I was thinking about why it would be better on the RS/RX and I figure that it is because of weight and the smaller wheels on the RS/RX. This would give the RS/RX lower gearing for stop start traffic.

I agree that Damien needs to get his car checked.

Cheers

Andy

Really just confirming everything everyone else has said, but I've been getting 12-14L/100km since the day I bought mine, no matter how I drive it.

Just filled it up (the fuel light had just come on) and got 550km out of 67L...= 12.2L/100km

That's a stock '01 ARX with 84,000km.

I think the iphone app is right even though the computer says it's 7 km's per litre. Now assuming I've got this right on the manual figures of 150km's and consumed 31.79 litres then it's 21 ish per 100 k's! Fark!

Which application are you using, Houdini? I'm using "Road Trip Lite" on mine (it's a free app), and it allows you to make inputs for when you do mods to your car so you can track the consumption against the changes you've made.

Damn man! Are you using 91RON unleaded or the correct 98RON Premium?

I generally use either BP ultimate, Mobil Synergy 8000 or Shell Vpower. None of which give me the any of the unpleasant effects outlined above.

have put all BP ultimate 98 in it except for one tank of the caltex 98 stuff :mad:

Which application are you using, Houdini? I'm using "Road Trip Lite" on mine (it's a free app), and it allows you to make inputs for when you do mods to your car so you can track the consumption against the changes you've made.

had a look at that one but ended up installing Gas Cubby. Paid up but with a free trial (I'm still on the free one). Might revisit roat trip to track the difference after a tune...

had a look at that one but ended up installing Gas Cubby. Paid up but with a free trial (I'm still on the free one). Might revisit roat trip to track the difference after a tune...

How are you going to tune?

Just interested to see what everyone is looking at doing to the ECU to achieve better fuel efficiency.

I just come up with some idea not sure if it gona work...

As everyone is talking about high flowing the turbo and our car been tunned stuipdly rich from the factory,

what if we just install a high flowed turbo means the car will run alot leaner...

will it balanced it out? or there will be more to consider?

have anyone dynoed ( for A/F reading ) thier car just with a high flowed turbo on?

Im keen to see if it works or not...

that doesnt work oz panda. because if more air is going into the motor, the 'correct' amount of fuel would also be added. i saw correct, because thats what the factory tune says...... if youre thinking of leaning it out by pushing it and upping the boost. thats the most stupid way of doing it. not to mention dangerous!

the only way to adjust this is by changing the ECU or getting some sort of piggyback system for it.

I just come up with some idea not sure if it gona work...

As everyone is talking about high flowing the turbo and our car been tunned stuipdly rich from the factory,

what if we just install a high flowed turbo means the car will run alot leaner...

will it balanced it out? or there will be more to consider?

have anyone dynoed ( for A/F reading ) thier car just with a high flowed turbo on?

Im keen to see if it works or not...

LOL did you miss when Craig said that he gave his ARX a boot full of loving a few blocks before he got home with the newly fitted high-flow and his fuel economy went down to 1.5L / KM lol.. That really is like watching a second hand on a clock, poor fuel :)

So no, some form of tune is still going to be required but at the end of the day if you pick a nice level of boost that suits daily driving the fuel economy is going to be an improvement anyway.

I just come up with some idea not sure if it gona work...

As everyone is talking about high flowing the turbo and our car been tunned stuipdly rich from the factory,

what if we just install a high flowed turbo means the car will run alot leaner...

will it balanced it out? or there will be more to consider?

have anyone dynoed ( for A/F reading ) thier car just with a high flowed turbo on?

Im keen to see if it works or not...

High flow means it pushed more air.

ECU has a predetermined air/fuel ratio it must adhere to, thus more air = more fuel for OE ECU.

My fuel economy remained the same after the highflow and hardly changed (0.1L/km) after the dump back exhaust.

LOL did you miss when Craig said that he gave his ARX a boot full of loving a few blocks before he got home with the newly fitted high-flow and his fuel economy went down to 1.5L / KM lol.. That really is like watching a second hand on a clock, poor fuel :wacko:

I presume the Jet was going by his leaf?

I am pretty sure that with the standard turbo, the green would bottom out of the leaf under WOT

boost is easily controlled via your right foot. you want less boost, dont push the pedal as hard :)

:)

..... or wait for the PM35.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Order for the 2025 model R35 GT-R were accepted from 3rd March and 26th August the last order rolled off the production line at the Tochigi plant. Concerning the R35 GT-R replacement, current Nissan CEO Ivan Espinosa said "Nothing has been decided about the GT-R at this time, but we are well aware that everyone is waiting. The GT-R will evolve and reappear in the future. Please be patient until that day comes." Nissan has a lot of issues with management and finances so take Espinosa's words with a big grain of salt. From what discussions I've had and read about here in Japan, not a lot of people are confident about Nissan's future, let alone the next GT-R. 
    • Thanks. We getting some parts along too so he will be solving the speed issue like next week so i will let you know what he came up with.   
    • 21 is explicitly the coils detected as the issue. Is it guaranteed the actual issue? No. Just the ECU thinks it is. When you say rattling, describe it better, get an audio clip as best you can if possible.
    • Yea got me coppers. Bad news is I just put them in and the car still has the light and shakes. I also noticed I hear like rattling coming from the exhaust piping right under me. Does 21 also have a possibility of being O2 sensors?   So, coil packs are good, the harness is good, the MAF is working, and obviously the spark plugs just replaced and working.
    • Make sure you drop the GTT base tune back in, and set your injectors again, this will remove anything playing up with it you may have removed. Possibly lean there as it's normally a fast transient going THROUGH atmospheric pressure, and a turbo motor would then quickly go richer as boost builds. The only worry you MIGHT have is ignition timing, as the DE is higher compression than the DET from memory. But again, you're not in boost, so the DE motor will be a lot more forgiving at atmospheric.   Get Murray, Kinkstahs, and Johnny's input on tuning haltechs, those guys have played with tuning enough in the past to be able to help now you're past the trouble shooting stage of the MAP issue
×
×
  • Create New...