Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Gaming nights  

46 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I think besides EVE everything else I am playing is under NDA.

I have all the valve games (that 23 game pack). Red orchestra ($5 lulz). COD4, need MW2. Would run missions in EVE or PvP I suppose. I think I have GRiD somewhere. Won't play DoW2 until 1.4 patch is released. Other stuff too so really whatever but I am pretty much over everything valve/source based.

Oh yeah I'll be playing the ArmA2 demo then might get that.

List of mp games, my votes are on tf2 & grid.

l4d is great fun but not too practical if we're going to have more than 4 players.

cod:w@w

css

grid

gta4

hl2:dm

killing floor

l4d

tf2

track mania (free)

ut3

ut2k4

dod:s

red orchestra

tfc

Edited by nicr4wks
scrap source... source is shit 1.6 ftw... ive been playing cs for over 7 years...gaurente rip you all at it :blush:

btw call of duty wouldnt be a bad idea and warcraft 3

Get with the times son, it's all about the source. Also, been playing on and off since year 9, which is 9.5 years...still wanna guarantee that ripping? :(

Anyone knocking the limits of CS:S should play some of the ridiculous number of fun maps that are out there. There are platform maps on which you don't kill anyone at all. Zombie maps, aliens vs predators, prison break, surf maps, pirate wars (fire cannons at each others ship). Makes for great laughs and entertainment on LAN nights. Everytime I get sick of one of these, a new style of map comes out and pulls me back in lol.

This is a good idea Ash, let's get it happening.

Edited by Birds

Hey lads..

Yeah I'd be keen, I've had steam for ages, although I don't run all my game through it.

COD4.

COD - WAW.

CS:S.

TF2

Also, I've got company of heroes, not too sure how many ppl have it here, but it is the holy grail of WW2 RTS. Loads of fun! :)

Oh I nearly forgot, Call of Duty, ZOOMMMMBBBBIIIIEEEESSS!!!!

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

CS:S is an absolute FAIL of a game. 1.6 ftw!

BTW muztek have you ever played competitively? I used to LAN back in the day.. i prob played for about 4 years flat stick and then i stopped playing. Just started playing 2 months ago after a 3 year break

Edited by topher_
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...