Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great effort I love the interior and the air box is excellent... similar to Group A GTR's no doubt where you got your inspiration from? Are you mounting the radiator lower? (I may have missed that bit).

Great effort I love the interior and the air box is excellent... similar to Group A GTR's no doubt where you got your inspiration from? Are you mounting the radiator lower? (I may have missed that bit).

Race Radiators in Vic are making me a shorter cross flow radiator. When I was at superlap I took a tonne of pics of the GIO airbox, and pretty much copied it

The Fuel system is now together.

P9150269.jpg

P9150265.jpg

P9150266.jpg

P9150268.jpg

Edited by sav man

Nice, im curious though, why you mount the the surge tank at the back of the car? just thinking in the event you backed it in would be about the first thing to go..

Not sayin you would back it it or anything...

it's about parralel with the tank, so there is probably more chance of the 73l plastic tank splitting, than a 1.5l alloy tank.

Main reason I did it was I wanted it behind the axel, and that was just the neatest/easiest place to put it.

photos are way to big ben. ive gone over my download limit just loading one page. homo

So every one. Ben is searching for a oil drain pipe to suit his rb20 turbo. if you have one please let hime know. he has $100 waiting for one.

  • 2 weeks later...

more updates

The airbox is coming together.

PA020283.jpg

PA020286.jpg

Got my turbo back from being highflowed.

PA020284.jpg

PA020285.jpg

I got a split dump from damo, as he has a new turbo setup coming. It was a modified batmbl pipe, so I am putting it back to standard. I welded in the split pipe from being a screamer, to plum back in

PA020288.jpg

PA020289.jpg

PA030290.jpg

PA030291.jpg

Now I just need to extend the main pipe, and put a flange on it.

Steave the roofer made 1/2 of the cover for the parcel shelf

PA030292.jpg

PA030293.jpg

Fuel rail, and 800cc injectors in.

PA020287.jpg

Some say it took steve the roofer half a pack of ciggies to make that. hes still got 1/2 a parcel shelf. 2 doors and 2 rear quarter bits to go.

it is however far better than ben or i could do as ben cuts stuff out worse than a pre-schooler and i cbf'ed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...