Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I had another look at the GTR yesterday. All the carbon looks amazing. Rear parcel shelf, bootlid & spoiler, bonnet/vents, engine bay, gearshift paddles, even new sport steering wheel. This Guy is the CARBON KING of South Australia!!! Very cool car.

Looking forward to hearing it under full noise out at the track. More photos Martin.........and maybe some dyno sheets?

Love to see the comparison to stock setup.

Near enough 400kw at all four wheels on our new Mainline AWD dyno at 17psi boost pressure is a nice start with a conservative tune, up from 270kw at all four stock. Thats getting close to a 50% power and matching torque improvement :D

The upgraded WR35TT turbochargers are responding nicely with excellent flat boost control, not tapering away or running out of puff at the top end like the stock pieces do. Also they will not suffer the same accelerated thrust wear and failure that the stock turbochargers do over 15psi, due to being ball bearing (no thrust bearing). So its looking nice at this stage :down:

Martin

When does the boost cut in for the new turbos? Same as the stock or a little later?

Has this affected the way the car takes off or does your car still have a little lag (if it is a ADM car) ?

Regards

Mark.

This owner could have bought a 911 or a Lambo etc, but he chose to go sick on a new R35 GTR.

Good on him. I went for a run in this car yesterday & it is awesome. Definate improvement over

my Std R35. Will look forward to going out in the country where we can stretch its legs a bit more.

Hmmm... these new turbos are looking good.

The best way of describing the response of this package is to show you the raw numbers. Attached is a dyno graph from our Mainline Chassis dyno that shows you exactly the gains vs a tune + midpipe GTR in actual percentage - the very best way of showing the comparison :)

wr35ttdiff.jpg

The best way of describing the response of this package is to show you the raw numbers. Attached is a dyno graph from our Mainline Chassis dyno that shows you exactly the gains vs a tune + midpipe GTR in actual percentage - the very best way of showing the comparison :woot:

wr35ttdiff.jpg

How large is the trade off lower in the rev range given the turbo's are now larger?

I did not get to go far in this car but it did not feel much different from the bottom end.

The new ball bearing core spools up faster than the std plain bearing & this car has aftermarket

dumps that replace the primary cats so less back pressure.

To really tell the difference I would have to drive this one & then mine back to back but considering

how new this car all is I dont see that happening & I wouldn't expect to.

Going for a ride in it will be fun enough.

The boost response of these turbochargers is absolutely excellent. No doubt there is a couple of hundred rpm difference in the spool - it is impossible to avoid this when going to larger turbochargers, however the short initial gearing of the GTR and its lightning fast 'on boost' GR6 transmission effectively hide any of this to the point where the car feels like it has stock bottom end response. Where it is much different is higher in the rpm where the compressors simply dont run 'out of wind' and fall of boost like the stock items do. Most importantly being ball bearing cored there are no thrust bearings to go into rapid wear and failure mode as happens with the stock GTR turbos. My belief - and I am biased on this one so forgive me - is that the WR35TT modification is superbly matched to the GTR, adding reliability with ball bearing core design, and integrating all of the factory pleasantness of a properly integrated turbocharger solution.

As for US dealers and fitters. We have a main Willall distributor in Atlanta Georgia, that being Forged Performance, and then several dealers throughout the country. Fontana Nissan Motorsport in LA, SPE are another in Socal, in fact there are many dealers you can work with directly on the East Coast of the US that have access to Willall parts and technology :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...