Jump to content
SAU Community

Wakefield + R35 + Willall Tune + Slicks = ?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In a _stock_ R32 GTR 1:09 would be scorching. Who did that?

Regards,

Saliya

fancy rubber a stock gtr would coast a 1.09

agreed. I've done a 1.08.02 in my production car. still miles behind what Duncan is doing in the r35, they are an outrageously quick track car out of the box.

agreed. I've done a 1.08.02 in my production car. still miles behind what Duncan is doing in the r35, they are an outrageously quick track car out of the box.

Come on fatz, Duncan:

A) Fancy rubber != stock, right? And decent rubber's worth about 2 seconds on that track?

B) Duncan's proddy car is an R32 GTR N1, right? - not a standard R32 GTR?

C) Was the car that did 1.08.02 as-supplied-by-Nissan? Really?

D) You _can_ drive a bit, can't you? And you've posted your "scorching" time, not your "coasting" time?

I don't know the answers to B, C, D but I still don't see a _stock_ R32 GTR turning in lazy 1:09s.

First, we have to find one; then convince one of you guys to pilot it :down:

What I'm getting at is that "the gap between the R35 and R32 is bigger than it looks".

Cheers,

Saliya

lol all true! its on good rubber (kumho v70A), has bilstein springs, eibach shocks and a power FC. And yes its an N1. And yes that is the quickest I've been around there in prod car specs. On the other hand it is over standard weight and running standard 12psi boost.

No doubt the r35 is at least 3 seconds quicker than the r32, which itself is no slouch.

I hear there was a '2' lap today in the R35, now thats starting to move :)

Dont worry LSX-438 you will soon be getting 'the computer drives it for you' - my personal favourite! :action-smiley-069:

wow what a day, can't believe we're running 1:02's now. This car never ceases to amaze, even a year down the track. Thanks for the tune Martin, working a charm.

Very impressed with the times!

To put throw a few other cars times up- a dude off ausrotary did a 1.01 in his FD RX7 track car on 19 inh slicks, t04z- but as I said- full track car.

The Unique Autosports 300zx has done a 1.04.65- http://www.advanwheels.com.au/cars/unique-300zx.aspx

That was 'ADJUST'... The 'gentleman' who featured in the other thread which basically turned to shit. He ran a 1.01.1 on old ex-24hr Nurburgring slicks (Ric Shaw's), same as this the cars in this thread. Amazing for a heated up 20 year old design.

That time for a R35 GTR is just bloody quick considering how new they are, for a street car or not. I can't imagine where they will be in 20 years. :)

Good parallel GT-R32!

Judging on that pace you need to run a 59 something ish then LSX-438, maybe in fantasyland :)

So nice though in a car you can drive to and from the track with a tyre change.

I think I see E85 and another 80hp in your future LSX... :)

Edited by Martin Donnon
that was a practice day, no official times. Last time out with natsoft timing at wakefield (on re55's) i ran a 1:05.3 i think, so the slicks seem to be good for a second or so around there. We'll be going out again in the next few days to improve on these times i hope. Does anyone think we could manage a 1:02?

Would not worry too much about crapsoft/datron "transponder held in shopping bag out side door of car LOL" results :D if you have a Race Logic (even ghetto spec $800 dollar unit) then you have accurate times simple as that :ermm:

Good job mate :cool:

Edited by RICE RACING
Would not worry too much about crapsoft/datron "transponder held in shopping bag out side door of car LOL" results :) if you have a Race Logic (even ghetto spec $800 dollar unit) then you have accurate times simple as that :)

sorry but no way is a GPS receiver more accurate than a dorian.

GPS is no quicker than 1/20th a second. Dorian reads 1/1000th

GPS is no more accurate than 1m. Dorian reads to under 10cm

As long as the dorian is mounted properly of course....if it moves relative to the car it will give an inaccurate result.

sorry but no way is a GPS receiver more accurate than a dorian.

GPS is no quicker than 1/20th a second. Dorian reads 1/1000th

GPS is no more accurate than 1m. Dorian reads to under 10cm

As long as the dorian is mounted properly of course....if it moves relative to the car it will give an inaccurate result.

You sir need to learn what you are talking about and who you are talking too before you post another foolish set as above :thumbsup:

Love the interweb :)

When you have your own $50k worth of #1 testing gear used all over the planet come talk to me. What I typed is correct, as I am the only person here qualified to type it as I have tested it, I own it, I use it all the time, Maybe though you with your internetz "opinion" should pass on your information to some others who test professionally I'm sure they would laugh at you pretty hard just as I am now :D

If you get a time on your low spec race logic GPS machine, I can tell you in reference to my unit it will be right. That was the point of my post was to assure people from facts that you do not need to rely on someone else to measure your car when you have the technology to do it yourself. No need for you to qualify your comments saying it was not "official" or measured with XYZ reference, they are irrelevant in this day and age and open to error anyway (both human and mechanical/electronic).

Edited by RICE RACING

although this is getting off topic, I found my sprint track lap at QR the other week was a full 0.8 seconds faster (58.2 versus 59.0) recorded via the Video Vbox lite versus the transponder thingy on the windscreen they plaster on. The unit quotes sampling at 10 Hz and of course as above, using algorithms to factor in velocity etc to improve accuracy. Any more thinking about it than that however makes my head hurt so I will concentrate on driving better. I hope the errors in each unit though are all relative and not random. reliable incremental gains are what we are all after, not just outright times.

back to the topic at hand

You've convinced me Dunc - 18 inch wheels & slicks, Cobb tune and maybe,just maybe an R2.two are all coming soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...