Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was once caught speeding by overhead aircraft back in '86 as I travelled between Hazelbrook to Woodford. My bad

And then the other night, I saw how the police track you from the plane.

My bone of contention is this:-

Whilst they have an observer punching the stop-watch as the car below crosses a line and times you till you get to the next line,

what if the observer clicks the button a fraction late on the 1st click or too early on the 2nd!!!!!

This means that you're deemed to be travelling too fast when you may not have been!!!

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it'll also depend on the angle of where the plane is looking from, i see this idea as a fail unless they have some gizmos that take ito acount the error margin.... somehow. Should be fairly easy to win in court, much the same as a police officer pulling you over for running a red light, but its proved he can't have made an acurate decision from certain angles and distances....

For example if you look at a speedo needle from the passenger seat of a vehicle, it looks like your doing more than you actually are.

I only figured that out coz way back on my Learners my dad kept telling me to slow down when in fact i was right on the speed limmit.

Doing it with a stopwatch is stupid, they should use timestamped video. If they watch you for a long time, then a few seconds off with the stopwatch will make bugger all difference.

Re the angle (parallax error) at that distance/speed it would be negligible (and you would work it out with high school maths if you had to).

Of course you're far more likely to get caught by a police car, as there's lots more of them....

Using a plane to catch people speeding has to be the most retarded thing ever.

Who pays the fuel bill?

Oh thats right, we do.

With the money they're wasting on that, they could probably employ another few police officers a year and do something about unemployment in the process...

the longer you live, the more things there are that can come back and bite you lol

imagine how many g/fs tiger would have had (and grandkids) if he wasn't caught until age 60 lol

Using a plane to catch people speeding has to be the most retarded thing ever.

Who pays the fuel bill?

Oh thats right, we do.

With the money they're wasting on that, they could probably employ another few police officers a year and do something about unemployment in the process...

The issue isn't about having enough money to employee the coppers, it's about having enough people wanting to do the job. :laugh:

haha I love your threads terry. so random. have you been dwelling on this for 23 years?

they gave up on planes long ago. cameras on poles are soooo much cheaper

Nah, I read in the paper that they're bringing a plane out to monitor the Hume near Marulan / Goulburn over Christmas.

^^^we living on fantasy island now Richard? hehe

I just get pissed off that the Police approach to the whole idea of 'policing' promotes...

i) fear of getting caught by men in blue wearing special leather caps & leather legs

ii) paranoia that you might slip-up even if you don't deliberately speed

iii) ultimatums with words like, "You will get caught" and...

iv) covert cops-can-fly tactic is nothing but revenue-raising

They just don't get the idea that we can appreciate their presence if they could compliment us through incentives.

I'd prefer it if a 'Brownie Point' system could prevail.

Each time you get a 'Brownie Point', you show it to your insurance company next time you pay a premium and get 2% extra on your no-claim bonus (.ie extra 2% off your premium).

But alas, bureaucracy keeps on winning over commonsense.

my rant.. haha..

Common sense and Govt. Departments don't mix, Terry. I worked for one for around 13 years, and the level of stupidity behind some departments, regulations and actions was sometimes beyond belief...

^^^we living on fantasy island now Richard? hehe

I just get pissed off that the Police approach to the whole idea of 'policing' promotes...

i) fear of getting caught by men in blue wearing special leather caps & leather legs

ii) paranoia that you might slip-up even if you don't deliberately speed

iii) ultimatums with words like, "You will get caught" and...

iv) covert cops-can-fly tactic is nothing but revenue-raising

They just don't get the idea that we can appreciate their presence if they could compliment us through incentives.

I'd prefer it if a 'Brownie Point' system could prevail.

Each time you get a 'Brownie Point', you show it to your insurance company next time you pay a premium and get 2% extra on your no-claim bonus (.ie extra 2% off your premium).

But alas, bureaucracy keeps on winning over commonsense.

my rant.. haha..

lol, I agree mate. the whole approach to speed enforcement in this country and this state is arse backwards. it's draconian at best! we pay huge fines, and face loss of work, convenience etc for small infringements even though speeding is not a major accident cause. they should be focussing on road condition, banning re-treads, stricter road-worthy checks that actually check road worthiness (not the loudness of your BOV or the placement of your boost controller FFS), and then spend money on educating people about the dangers of fatigue and driver inexperience and changing weather conditions. some driver training wouldn't hurt either. a 2 day course like they have for bikes would do wonders.

lol, I agree mate. the whole approach to speed enforcement in this country and this state is arse backwards. it's draconian at best! we pay huge fines, and face loss of work, convenience etc for small infringements even though speeding is not a major accident cause. they should be focussing on road condition, banning re-treads, stricter road-worthy checks that actually check road worthiness (not the loudness of your BOV or the placement of your boost controller FFS), and then spend money on educating people about the dangers of fatigue and driver inexperience and changing weather conditions. some driver training wouldn't hurt either. a 2 day course like they have for bikes would do wonders.

This is why beerbaron is the admin/moderator lol :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...