Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

shat myself today. was at lights going thru the city today, at the lights opn northbourne intersecting london cct, white 34 GTR v-spec, black plates. this dude has got one of those oversized custom black plastic plates, with an apexi logo under his rear rego, looked farken hot

got a photo of it from the car, which i might post later

Glad to see I'm not the only one who's seen this car.

Hot as!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/221/#findComment-1656873
Share on other sites

I saw the white 34 last friday night. May of cut him off?? Ooopppsss.

Also just spotted a burgundy/dark redish sorta coloured Stag. ON Yamba Drive. Had an elderly lady driving it (i think eek) Didnt look like the sort of SAU person, BUT!!! i may be wrong

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/221/#findComment-1657434
Share on other sites

DJHatton

Yeh I'm the new owner that chased you through civic to braddon last night (#RB026??)... hope you enjoyed your dinner. Is anyone catching up at all this weekend? i wouldnt mind going for a cruise and meeting some of the lads from here in person

My moby is 0409027537 if anyone is out driving tonight

post-24130-1129887181.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/221/#findComment-1658269
Share on other sites

spotted a black wingless r32 in civic just then - gave a wave, not sure if he waved back.

Yeh mate i think that was me, near the RSL right? I gave u a wave back but you where driving off. Its the first time shes been out with the new rims on it, my old ones where gold five spoke Work's that where hacked up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/221/#findComment-1658304
Share on other sites

spotted a gunmetal R33 with kit & gold wheels, and SAU sticker across back windscreen...at the roundabout before chisholm about 5.30pm.

i have a feeling thats andrew,

gunmetalR33

has a veilside kit, came into ed's when i was work ex'ing and was running turboless with race tape holding on the AFM pipe to the inlet...worst sound ever :D

but silicon hoses are good :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/221/#findComment-1658591
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...